Definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer consists of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy. In EBRT, a central shield (CS) reduces the dose to the rectum and bladder. The combination of whole-pelvic (WP)- and CS-EBRT and brachytherapy is the standard radiotherapy protocol in Japan. Despite clinical studies, including multi-institutional clinical trials, showing that the Japanese treatment protocol yields favorable treatment outcomes with low rates of late radiation toxicities, dose–volume parameters for the Japanese treatment protocol remain to be established. We conducted a retrospective dose–volume analysis of 103 patients with uterine cervical cancer treated with the Japanese protocol using computed tomography–based adaptive brachytherapy. The 2-year overall survival and 2-year local control rates according to FIGO stage were 100% and 100% for Stage I, 92% and 94% for Stage II, and 85% and 87% for Stage III–IV, respectively. Late adverse effects in the rectum and bladder were acceptable. Receiver operating characteristic analysis discriminated recurrence within the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) (n = 5) from no local recurrence (n = 96), with the optimal response obtained at a dose of 36.0 GyEQD2 for HR-CTV D90 and 28.0 GyEQD2 for HR-CTV D98. These values were used as cut-offs in Fisher exact tests to show that high HR-CTV D90 and HR-CTV D98 doses for brachytherapy sessions were significantly associated with tumor control within the HR-CTV. These data suggest a contribution of brachytherapy to local tumor control in WP- and CS-EBRT and brachytherapy combination treatment, warranting validation in multi-institutional prospective studies.
Background and purpose: We investigated the incidence and dose-volume relationships of radiation pneumonitis (RP) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by durvalumab for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed records of 36 patients with LA-NSCLC who underwent CCRT followed by durvalumab. Incidence of RP was analyzed for correlations with clinical factors and dose-volume parameters of lung in radiotherapy. Results: All patients received 60 Gy in 30 fractions of radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Over a median follow-up period of 7 months, incidence of grade 2 RP was 36% (including grade 3 RP: 5% and grade 5 RP: 3%). Age, sex, Brinkman index, and blood test results did not significantly differ between patients with grade 2 RP and grade 1 RP. Dose-volume parameters (lung volumes that received 5 Gy, 10 Gy, 20 Gy, 30 Gy, 40 Gy, 50 Gy, and mean lung dose) were significantly higher among patients with grade 2 RP compared with patients with grade 1 RP. Conclusion: Incidence of grade 2 RP was 36% after CCRT followed by durvalumab for LA-NSCLC, but did not significantly differ from those of patients treated with CCRT alone. Lung dose-volume parameters were significantly correlated with RP.
The feasibility of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) for Japanese patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) remains unclear. Here we reviewed our initial experience of IMRT with IFRT for Japanese patients with LA-NSCLC to evaluate the feasibility of the treatment. Twenty LA-NSCLC patients who were treated with IMRT with IFRT during November 2019 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received 60 Gy in 30 fractions of IMRT and were administered concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. The median patient age was 71 years old and the group included 15 men and 5 women. The patient group included 2 patients with stage IIB, 11 patients with stage IIIA, 5 patients with stage IIIB, and 2 patients with stage IIIC disease. Histological diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma in 14 patients, adenocarcinoma in 5 patients, and non-small cell lung cancer in 1 patient. The median follow-up period was 8 months. The incidence of grade 3 or greater pneumonitis was 5%, and grade 3 or greater esophagitis was not observed. None of the patients developed regional lymph node, with only recurrence reported so far. These findings indicate that IMRT with IFRT for Japanese patients with LA-NSCLC is feasible in terms of acute toxicity. Further study with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up to clarify the effect of treatment on patient prognosis is required.
Background: Durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) has been found to significantly improve overall survival (OS). However, the effect of durvalumab on local control remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the effect of the durvalumab on local control in comparison with the clinical result of patients treated with CCRT alone. Methods: A total of 120 LA-NSCLC patients including 76 patients with CCRT alone and 44 patients with CCRT followed by durvalumab were analyzed. Baseline patient characteristics of CCRT alone cohort and durvalumab cohort were compared with student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and with chi-squared test for categorical variables. Local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS) and OS rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: There were 19 patients with stage II disease and 101 patients with stage III disease. Age, sex, histopathological type, T classification, N classification, clinical stage, tumor volume and dose fractionation schedule were not significantly different between the CCRT alone and durvalumab cohorts. The one-year LC rate was significantly higher in the durvalumab cohort (86%) compared with the CCRT alone cohort (62%) (P = 0.005), whereas no significant difference was observed in either PFS (P = 0.864) or OS (P = 0.443) between the CCRT and durvalumab cohorts. Conclusions: The one-year LC rate was significantly higher in the durvalumab cohort compared with the CCRT alone cohort. Although the follow-up period was too short to draw definitive conclusions, the study revealed that durvalumab might have a significant effect on LC.
This study evaluated the feasibility of applying volumetric-arc radiotherapy (VMAT) in standard curative radiotherapy for non-bulky cervical cancer using the central-shielding principle. Whole-pelvis irradiation of 20 Gy and central-shielding pelvis irradiation of 30 Gy, both in 2 Gy fractions, were created using 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) with a standard midline block or VMAT. Composite dose distributions and DVH parameters were compared first in a simple phantom model and then in 10 clinical cases of Stage I–II cervical cancer. Whole-pelvis clinical target volumes (CTVs) were created from published guidelines for primary disease and lymph node regions, and CTVs for central-shielding irradiation were created by subtracting uterus corpus and 4 cm-wide regions centered at the cervical canal and vagina. In a phantom model, VMAT provided adequate dose coverage to the PTVs without excessive doses to the rectum or bladder compared with the 3DCRT plan. In the clinical cases, VMAT plans resulted in slightly but significantly better coverage of PTVs. The DVH parameters for the rectum and bladder were equivalent or lower for VMAT plans compared with the 3DCRT plans. In the bowel, V30Gy, V40Gy, and V50Gy were significantly lower in VMAT plans compared with in the 3DCRT plans (47.6% vs 61.0%, 29.8% vs 56.2% and 6.8% vs 21.1%, respectively). Based on these results, VMAT may be used in external-beam radiotherapy for early-stage cervical cancer by adopting the principle of central-shielding pelvis irradiation. Furthermore, VMAT is likely to reduce doses to the small bowel and may reduce gastrointestinal toxicities for these patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.