Premature shutdown of electrolytic baths after a short service life leads to an increase in the cost of aluminum and serious economic losses. The most important element governing the service life of an electrolytic bath is the hearth that is lined with refractory hearth blocks. Presence of one concealed crack, that is exposed in the start-up period, may lead to failure of the whole electrolyzer in the first year of service. There are many producers and users of hearth blocks, and there are many specifications for cathode hearth blocks, although the requirements for them are selected in a very empirical way without considering actual service conditions. Scientifically based requirements for the material of hearth blocks is still in the formation stage. In 2004 in four aluminum enterprises under major repair hearth blocks were used from nine different producers that made it possible during evaluation of the statistics for shutting down young baths to determine the effect of the structure and properties of hearth blocks on the service life of electrolyzers and to formulate requirements for hearth block material. The contribution of permeable porous cathode carbon blocks on premature shutdown of electrolyzers by a mechanism of hearth uplift due to formation of a lens of electrolyte and refractory reaction products is demonstrated. Critical gas permeability and the maximum size of permeable pores in refractory hearth units are determined. Applicability of the first and second Hasselman criteria for the heat resistance of hearth block materials is demonstrated for predicting shutdown of young baths by a crack development mechanism in blocks due to thermomechanical stresses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.