No abstract

We particularly thank Larry Lessig and Cass Sunstein for graciously shanng with us numerous early drafts of their article. Finally. we wish to note that this Article is the synthesis of two separate manuscripts prepared by each of us in response to Professors Lessig and Sunstei. Professor Calabresi's manuscript developed the originalist textual arguments for the unitary Executive, and Mr Prakash's manuscript developed the pre-and post-ratification histoncal arguments. We are deeply grateful to Akhil Reed Amar for encouraging us to collaborate and to the editors of Tie Yale Law Journal for allowing us to present jointly our mutually reinforcing arguments for the unitary Executive here

The Melting Laws at High PressuresBY 0. P. SHARMA (a), G. S. SHARMA (a), and S. PRAKASH (b) Presently, a number of equations are available showing the pressure dependence of the melting temperature in solids due to the thermal effect. Simon's empirical fusion equation [l, 21 to fit the experimentally measured values of melting temperature at elevated pressure is one of the important and extensively used relations which is given by A2 T, = T, , (1 + $) ,where T, , and T, are the melting temperatures at zero excess pressure and at excess pressure P, respectively. A , and A , are constants known as Simon's constants. However, this equation cannot be used satisfactorily for extrapolating high pressure laboratory melting data [3]. Also, there is no theory [4,5] so far which could give the values of A , matching well with the experimentally found values, and there is no identification of Al and A, with some physical properties of the solid. Kraut and Kennedy [6,7] also gave an empirical relationship between the room temperature compression AVjV, and the melting temperature to explain experimental measurements of T, , Recently, Kumari and Dass [8,9] have also made a similar attempt and suggested a relationship in the form

No abstract

No abstract