In this study, we formulate a new inflation equation to capture the potential effects of gold and stock prices on inflation in Pakistan. We aim to assess the inflation-hedging properties of gold compared to other assets such as real estate, stock exchange securities, and foreign currency holdings. Applying time-series econometric techniques (cointegration and vector error correction models) to data for 1960–2010, we find that gold is a potential determinant of inflation in Pakistan. On the other hand, it also provides a complete hedge against unexpected inflation. Real estate assets are more than a complete hedge against expected inflation, although stock exchange securities outperform gold and real estate as a hedge against unexpected inflation. Foreign currency proves to be an insignificant hedge against inflation. Given the dual nature of the relationship between gold and inflation, it is increasingly important for the government to monitor and regulate the gold market in Pakistan. Moreover, stock market investment should be encouraged by the government given that asset price inflation does not pose a critical problem for Pakistan as yet.
According to the Harberger-Laursen-Metzler (HLM) effect, an exogenous
temporary increase in the terms of trade leads to an improvement in the current
account balance. This paper uses a recursive vector autoregression to investigate
empirically the existence of the HLM effect in Pakistan, using a time series dataset
for the period 1980–2009. Two important results emerge. First, real income
deteriorates with an improvement in the terms of trade. Second, the current
account balance also responds negatively to innovations in the terms of trade,
which implies that the HLM effect does not exist in Pakistan.
The effect of oil price shocks on global economy has been a
great concern since 1970s and has instigated a great deal of research
investigating macroeconomic consequences of oil price fluctuations.
Later on, the instability in the Middle East and recent oil price hike
confirmed the enduring significance of the issue. Though a voluminous
body of literature has evolved examining the bearings of oil prices for
internal sectors of economies [to name a few, e.g., Barsky and Kilian
(2004); Kilian (2008a,b); Hamilton (2008)], the studies analysing the
external sector response to oil price shocks are very few [see, e.g.
Kilian, et al. (2007)]. The determination of current account and
exchange rate—the two major indicators of external sector—has been
studied widely in theoretical and empirical literature but mostly the
discussion of the two variables largely remained separate [Lee and Chinn
(1998)]. Similarly, investigation of simultaneous response of these two
variables to an oil price shock remained relatively less ventured avenue
of research. Initial work done on the relationship between current
account and oil price could not ascertain conclusive link between these
two variables.1 Recent work on the issue revealed the diversity of
responses of current account of different countries to an oil price
shock. For instance, oil price increase deteriorates current account
balance of developing countries [OECD (2004); Rebucci and Spatafora
(2006); Killian, et al. (2007)] but may improve it if the country
happens to be a net oil-exporter. This implies that the relationship
depends on the number of factors among which oil dependency of country,
oil-intensity of production process2 and responses of non-oil trade
balance3 and sources of oil price fluctuations4are of particular
significance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.