Introduction Trauma is one of the important issues in public health because it is responsible for 90% of mortality in Low and Middle-Income Countries (LIMCs). The present study aimed to determine the epidemiological pattern of trauma patients in a regional trauma center in the Midwest of Iran from 2014 to 2020. Methods This study was a retrospective study that was performed on 29,804 trauma patients admitted to Be′sat Hospital in Hamadan from January 2014 to December 2020. Data was collected using Health Information Management (HIM) Center of the Be′sat Hospital. For investigating the relationship of the characteristics of trauma patients and the mechanisms of trauma, Multiple Multinomial Logistic Regression (MMNLR) model was used. All statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 24. Results The mean age of all patients was 35.4 (SD = 21.9) years. Most of them were men (71.7%). The most common mechanism of trauma was road traffic accidents (RTAs) (39.6%) followed by falls (30.2%), other (19.7%), violence (6.2%), and burn (4.4%). 1.5% of the trauma patients expired. The results of multiple multinomial logistic regression indicated that significant affected factor on odds referring because of RTAs compared to other mechanism were: season and hospital length of stay (LOS); in falls and violence: age, sex, season, and LOS; and in burn: age, sex, season, evening time, and LOS (p < 0.05). Conclusion Based on the investigation of 29,804 trauma patients, in Iran as a developing country, RTAs and falls were two common mechanisms of trauma. It seems that as a short-term plan, it is possible to focus on road safety, to improve the quality of vehicles, to hold training courses for drivers. Also, as a long-term goal, considering that the elderly population in Iran is increasing, it is necessary to pay attention to fall reduction programs.

No abstract

Background Osteoporosis is one of the most important risk factors for failure of the spine instrumentation. Management of patients with osteoporosis who requires spinal surgery because of the difficulty in instrument placement and the potential complications is still a challenge. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of lumbar spinal canal stenosis after instrumentation in patients with and without osteoporosis. Methods This prospective cohort study was performed from June 2018 to December 2020, in Be'sat Hospital, Hamadan, Iran. The sample consisted of patients over 50 years old referred to Be'sat Hospital with a diagnosis of lumbar spinal canal stenosis who underwent instrumental surgery (n = 107). Based on bone densitometry, the sample was divided into two groups with osteoporosis (n = 34) and without osteoporosis (n = 73). To collect data, we used a three-part researcher-made questionnaire (demographic information, medical records information, and paraclinical parameters). Statistical analyzes were performed by the Fisher Exact, chi-square, independent t-test, Multiple ANCOVA, Mann–Whitney and the Rank Wilcoxson tests using Stata version 17 software. Results The mean age (SD) of patients in the two groups with and without osteoporosis was 67.9 (7.0) and 59.1 (5.1) years, respectively (p = 0.001). The results indicated that a significant difference was observed between the two groups in sex (p = 0.032), educational status (p = 0.001), marital status (p = 0.023), employment status (p = 0.004), menopausal status (p = 0.018), taking corticosteroids (p = 0.028), and body mass index (p = 0.015). Also, there was a significant difference between two groups in the loosening of instrument (p = 0.039), the postoperative pain intensity (p = 0.007), fusion (p = 0.047), and neurogenic claudication (p = 0.003). Based on multiple ANCOVA test, there was not a significant difference between two groups in the clinical and paraclinical charatecristics (p > 0.05). The mean (SD) of T-Score in the osteoporosis group was 3.06 (0.37). Conclusion This study provides evidence that there is no significant difference in the clinical outcomes of lumbar spine instrumentation due to spinal canal stenosis in patients with and without osteoporosis. Because of the high cost of specific instrumentation developed for patients with osteoporosis and their unavailability, it seems that the use of conventional instrumentation along with complete treatment of osteoporosis can help improve the clinical outcome of surgery in these patients.

No abstract