No abstract

No abstract

The purpose of this case report was to explore the benefits that could be obtained from using TAREK approach in the evaluation of patient who was poorly responding to regular physical therapy sessions. The study subject was a 52 years old right hand dominant house wife, who is suffering from neck-shoulder pain and deconditioning after sustaining a traumatic injury four months ago. The patient did not show any satisfactory response to physical therapy sessions and was reported to senior physical therapist for further evaluation using TAREK approach. The systematic way of using TAREK approach enabled the therapist to extract detailed clinical findings, judge the effect of applying short session of intervention, and evaluate the region of concern in addition to finally evaluate the gross functional mobility. It has been concluded that TAREK approach is applicable and should be increasingly adopted by clinicians to provide better management for poorly responding patients.

Background: Neck pain is the second largest cause of disability worldwide. The chronic neck pain prevalence is 14% which is somewhat higher in females as compared to males. In India, the reported prevalence is 6%. Therapeutically, neck pain is managed by physiotherapists using rest, stretching and strengthening exercises, educating patient, and intense proprioception and positional exercises. Aim: We aimed to determine the evidences for the efficacy of sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAG s) in the management of mechanical neck pain. Methods: One hundred patients (age group: 25–45 years) who were diagnosed with neck pain, with onset >1–3 months (chronic), were randomly assigned to Group A receiving conventional physiotherapy plus SNAGs and Group B receiving conventional physiotherapy plus ultrasound (US). Treatment was given for three times a week for the period of 2 weeks, once a day for 6 sessions. Before treatment and after 2 weeks of treatment, pain, range of motion (ROM), and neck disability were assessed on Visual Analog Scale (VAS), goniometer, and Neck Disability Index (NDI), respectively. This study was conducted in Raj Nursing and Paramedical College, Gorakhpur, ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04617288. Results: Patients in Group A that received conventional physiotherapy plus SNAGs showed greater improvement in pain and ROM compared with the conventional physiotherapy plus US group on the 2nd week compared with pretreatment (P < 0.050). Conclusion: The result of the study suggests that both the SNAG and US groups improve the symptoms of neck pain. The US group improved the pain symptoms but was too small to reach satisfactory outcome for patients. Based on these results, conventional physiotherapy plus SNAGs should be the treatment of choice for neck pain rather than conventional physiotherapy plus US.

No abstract