This paper reports the evaluation of a new photosensitizer, Radachlorin in comparison with one of its well known components but used solely, Chlorin e6. The photodynamic properties, cell uptake and localisation of the 2 drugs were compared. In vitro studies were conducted on human adenocarcinoma cells (HT-29) and lung carcinoma cell line (A549). Both dyes showed an absorption maximum between 640 and 650 nm, that were enhanced by serum, with a shifted maximum at 661 nm. In vitro, phototoxicities of Radachlorin and Chlorin e6 were nearly identical for HT29 and A549 cells. However, Radachlorin reached its optimal LD50 sooner (0.59 microg ml(-1) for 3 h incubation followed by 20 J cm(-2) of 664 nm light (0.02 W cm(-2))) than Chlorin e6 (0.60 microg ml(-1) for 4 h incubation). For in vivo studies, Swiss athymic mice were grafted with human lung carcinoma of the line A549 15 days before intravenous photosensitizer injection. Fluorescence was recorded through an optical fibre spectrofluorimeter using the 666 nm peak for detection. Maximum Radachlorin fluorescence in tumor was observed 2 h after injection (1412 +/- 313 AU). Selectivity was expressed by the calculated tumor-to-skin and tumor-to-muscle ratios. Maximum ratios (1.45 +/- 0.14 for tumor-to-skin and 1.95 +/- 0.29 tumor-to-muscle) were observed 7 h after injection with Radachlorin. Maximal Chlorin e6 fluorescence was observed 1 h (shortest time interval measured) after injection in all organs and highest tumor-to-muscle ratio (2.56 +/- 0.97) 8 h after injection. Chlorin e6 fluorescence in skin was always at least equivalent to tumor fluorescence. Complete response of grafted tumor was achieved (no recurrence observed during 15 days) after 20 mg kg(-1) IV injection and 200 J cm(-2) irradiation (0.3 W cm(-2)) with both drugs. Optimal delays between injection and light delivery were between 1 and 7 h with Radachlorin and 3 h for Chlorin e6 but severe adverse effects were noted for both drugs when drug-light intervals were shorter than 3 h. This suggests that clinical use would be easier with Radachlorin than Chlorin e6.

No abstract

No abstract

Singlet oxygen (1O2) is produced by leucocytes during inflammatory reactions, various biochemical reactions and during photoreactions. It deactivates by reacting with a number of targets to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and peroxides (that in turn produce ROS). To verify whether serum had the same capability to deactivate secondary oxidants after exposure to 1O2, we provoked a photoreaction using rose bengal added to sera of 53 healthy donors and, after light delivery, reduced 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein (DCFH) was added at the end of irradiation and fluorescence of the oxidized derivative (DCF) was recorded. To avoid optical artifacts, we analyzed the influence of hemolysis. Deactivation capability of secondary oxidants after exposure to (1)O(2) was stable over a long period of time, slightly different between men and women, but standard biochemistry parameters had little influence. Hemolysis, age and platelet number reduced deactivation of 1O2-induced secondary oxidants. Addition of lysed cancer cells had no influence. Blood sampling in clot act tubes gave a better signal than in heparinized tubes. Red blood cells (RBCs) loaded with antioxidants strongly decreased deactivation of secondary oxidants. Assays are in progress to evaluate the clinical implications of these findings.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) produces singlet oxygen and reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage tumor cells and the vasculature. The resulting effect is a balance between photo-oxidations through primary or secondary ROS and scavenging activity. Sensitizers are distributed in the extracellular space before and during cell sensitization, suggesting that PDT could act directly on cell structures and on extracellular compartments, including sera. In this study we endeavored to determine whether the application of PDT to culture medium could affect cell survival. Culture medium [RPMI 1640 supplemented with fetal calf serum (FCS)] was incubated with Rose Bengal and irradiated before being added to cells for various contact times as a replacement for untreated medium. Cells were then kept in darkness until the survival assay. Treated medium reduced cell survival by up to 40% after 30 min of contact for 10 microg/ml of Rose Bengal and 20 J/cm(2). Rose Bengal or m-THPC alone or irradiated in water had no effect. This effect was dependent on the doses of Rose Bengal and light and decreased when FCS was replaced by human serum mixed with FCS. The reduction in survival observed with treated medium was more pronounced when the cell doubling time was shorter. Analysis of ROS or peroxide production in treated medium by DCFH added at the end of irradiation of Rose Bengal in serum-containing medium revealed a long-lasting oxidizing activity. Our findings support the hypothesis of an ROS- or peroxide-mediated, PDT-induced, long-lasting cell toxicity.