Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh ukuran perusahaan, profitabilitas, dan leverage terhadap kebijakan dividen. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan menggunakan sampling jenuh atau sensus dan diperoleh sebanyak 47 perusahaan manufaktur yang membayarkan dividen dan menghasilkan profit di BEI selama tahun 2014-2016. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ukuran perusahaan dan profitabilitas berpengaruh terhadap kebijakan dividen, sedangkan leverage tidak berpengaruh. Kata Kunci : kebijakan dividen, profitabilitas, ukuran perusahaan, leverage

Capital structure is part of the financial structure that keeps the balance between total debt with own capital. The high capital structure will reflect how the company's financial position. Capital structure decisions are one of the key financial decisions in financing assets and increasing business capital. This study aims to find out how the influence of profitability, business risk and interest rates on capital structure. The sample in this research is transportation company starting from 2012-2015 which amounts to 24 companies, with sampling technique using purposive sampling. Based on multiple linier regression analysis method, this research found that profitability have significant positive effect to capital structure, business risk and interest rate have significant negative effect to capital structure.Keywords: Capital structure, profitability, business risk, interest rate.

Stock price volatility reflects the fluctuations on stock price movements and the level of risk faced by investors. This research examines the impact of dividend policy, leverage, and firm size on stock price volatility. The research variables were measured by dividend payout ratio, debt to equity ratio, and natural logarithm of total assets. This research was conducted on 19 samples of property, real estate, and construction sector companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) that distributed consecutive dividends during 2013-2017. Multiple linear regression used as the analysis technique. The analysis result shows that simultaneously dividend policy, leverage, and firm size influence stock price volatility. Partially dividend policy and firm size has negative impact on stock price volatility while leverage has positive impact on stock price volatility. Keywords : dividend, leverage, firm size, volatility

This research was conducted at a manufacturing company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population used are all listed manufacturing companies respectively and disclose information about corporate governance practices in BEI period 2014-2016. Sample determination method used in this study is saturated sampling, with the number of samples obtained 40 companies. Data analysis used is multiple linear regression test. Based on the results of this research analysis found that the size of the board of directors and institutional ownership have a positive and significant effect on capital structure. Another variable that is independent commissioner has positive and insignificant effect on capital structure and managerial ownership have negative and not significant significant to capital structure. This suggests that the more existing board of directors in the company will improve monitoring of management performance, it also applies to the increase of institutional ownership.   Keywords: capital structure, corporate governance, manufacturing company

<p>Reksa dana saham merupakan reksa dana yang menawarkan keuntungan yang tinggi namun juga memiliki risiko yang tinggi karena dipengaruhi oleh fluktuasi yakni penurunan harga saham yang dipengaruhi mekanisme pasar di bursa efek. Oleh karena itu para calon investor harus memiliki pengetahuan dalam memilih reksa dana mana yang akan dipilih. Dalam penelitian ini ingin membandingkan antara metode pengukuran kinerja Treynor, Sharpe, dan Jensen. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui ranking kinerja reksa dana saham yang dihasilkan menggunakan  ketiga metode tersebut, membandingkan kinerja reksa dana saham dengan suatu standar pengukuran (<em>benchmark</em>) yaitu kinerja IHSG, dan kemudian untuk mengetahui ada atau tidaknya perbedaan ranking yang dihasilkan oleh ketiga metode tersebut. Berdasarkan hasil penilaian kinerja dengan metode Sharpe, jika dibandingkan dengan IHSG sebagai <em>benchmark</em>, sebanyak 17 (18,5 persen)  reksa dana memiliki kinerja yang <em>outperform</em> atau kinerjanya di atas kinerja portofolio pasar. Sisanya sebanyak 75 reksa dana ditemukan <em>underperform</em> atau kinerjanya di bawah portofolio pasar. Hasil penilaian kinerja dengan metode Treynor dan Jensen, sebanyak 33 (35,87 persen) reksa dana memiliki kinerja yang <em>outperform</em> atau kinerjanya di atas kinerja portofolio pasar. Sisanya sebanyak 59 reksa dana ditemukan <em>underperform. </em>Reksa dana yang <em>outperform</em> dapat dipertimbangkan oleh investor sebagai alternatif investasi. Dari hasil pengujian statistik mengenai perbedaan ranking kinerja reksa dana dengan menggunakan metode Sharpe, Treynor, dan Jensen, dapat disimpulkan bahwa ketiga metode penilaian kinerja tidak menghasilkan ranking kinerja yang berbeda-beda secara signifikan</p><p> </p><p><em>Equity funds are mutual funds that offer high profits but also have a high risk because they are influenced by fluctuations in the decline in stock prices which are influenced by market mechanisms on the stock exchange. Therefore, potential investors must have knowledge in choosing which mutual fund to choose. In this study wanted to compare the performance measurement methods of Treynor, Sharpe, and Jensen. The purpose of this study was to determine the ranking performance of equity funds generated using these three methods, compare the performance of equity funds with a benchmark standard, namely the JCI performance, and then to find out whether or not there are ranking differences generated by these three methods. . Based on the results of the performance evaluation with the Sharpe method, when compared with the JCI as a benchmark, as many as 17 (18.5 percent) mutual funds have outperformed performance or performance above the market portfolio performance. The results of the performance appraisal with the Treynor and Jensen methods, as many as 33 (35.87 percent) mutual funds have outperformed performance or performance above the market portfolio performance. Mutual funds that are outperformed can be considered by investors as an alternative investment. From the results of statistical tests regarding differences in the ranking of mutual fund performance using the Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen methods, it can be concluded that the three methods of performance appraisal do not produce performance ratings that differ significantly.</em><em></em></p>