No abstract

Health care payment and delivery models that challenge providers to be accountable for outcomes have fueled interest in community-level partnerships that address the behavioral, social, and economic determinants of health. We describe how Hennepin Health--a county-based safety-net accountable care organization in Minnesota--has forged such a partnership to redesign the health care workforce and improve the coordination of the physical, behavioral, social, and economic dimensions of care for an expanded community of Medicaid beneficiaries. Early outcomes suggest that the program has had an impact in shifting care from hospitals to outpatient settings. For example, emergency department visits decreased 9.1 percent between 2012 and 2013, while outpatient visits increased 3.3 percent. An increasing percentage of patients have received diabetes, vascular, and asthma care at optimal levels. At the same time, Hennepin Health has realized savings and reinvested them in future improvements. Hennepin Health offers lessons for counties, states, and public hospitals grappling with the problem of how to make the best use of public funds in serving expanded Medicaid populations and other communities with high needs.

BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is prevalent, management benefits from high-quality clinical practice guidelines, and yet LBP is a common source of low value care. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the association between the type of initial contact health care provider (HCP), service utilization, and total episode cost for the management of LBP.MethodsEpisode of care was used to analyze a US national sample of LBP episodes completed in 2017-2019. A combined surgical and non-surgical (pooled) sample and a non-surgical sample were separately analyzed. The primary independent variable was the type of the initial contact HCP. Dependent measures included rate and timing of use of 14 types of health care services and total episode cost. The association between initial contact HCP, total episode cost and rate of prescription opioid and NSAID use was tested using a mixed effects model.ResultsThe study included 616,766 continuously insured individuals aged 18 years and older with 756,631 episodes of LBP involving 386,795 HCPs and incurring $1,010,495,291 in expenditures. A primary care or specialist HCP was initially contacted in 62.0% of episodes, with these episodes associated with early use of low-value services such as imaging, pharmacologic, and interventional services. A non-prescribing HCP was initially contacted in 32.5% of episodes with these episodes associated with early use of guideline recommended first line services. Each type of HCP emphasized different initial services with little indication of a stepped approach to managing LBP. Following adjustment for covariates chiropractors were associated with the lowest total episode cost. As an observational study of associations, numerous confounders may have impacted results.ConclusionsAn individual with LBP has different experiences based on the type of HCP initially contacted. Initial contact with primary care or specialist HCPs is associated with second- and third-line services provided before first line services, with little indication of a guideline recommended stepped approach to managing LBP. Increasing the likelihood of guideline-concordant, high-value care for LBP may require systemic changes to the health care delivery system. In the absence of red flags these changes may include increasing the proportion of individuals receiving early non-pharmacological treatment, either through improving direct access to non-prescribing HCPs or increasing timely referrals from primary care and specialist health care providers.

Background: Accurate measurement of household food purchase behavior (HFPB) is important for understanding its association with household characteristics, individual dietary intake and neighborhood food retail outlets. However, little research has been done to develop measures of HFPB. The main objective of this paper is to describe the development of a measure of HFPB using annotated food purchase receipts.

Psychiatric illness confers significant risk for severe COVID-19 morbidity and mortality; identifying psychiatric risk factors for vaccine hesitancy is critical to mitigating risk in this population. This study examined the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy among those with psychiatric illness and the associations between psychiatric morbidity and vaccine hesitancy. Data came from electronic health records and a patient survey obtained from 14,365 patients at a group medical practice between February and May, 2021. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds for vaccine hesitancy adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and physical comorbidity. Of 14,365 participants 1,761 (12.3%) participants reported vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy was significantly more prevalent among participants with substance use (29.6%), attention deficit and hyperactivity (23.3%), posttraumatic stress (23.1%), bipolar (18.0%), generalized anxiety (16.5%), major depressive (16.1%), other anxiety (15.5%), and tobacco use disorders (18.6%), and those previously infected with COVID-19 (19.8%) compared to participants without these disorders. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and physical comorbidities, substance use disorders and tobacco use were significantly associated with increased odds for vaccine hesitancy and bipolar disorder was significantly inversely associated with vaccine hesitancy. Interventions to improve uptake in these populations may be warranted.