No abstract

Animal models of addictive behaviors are useful for uncovering neural mechanisms involved in the development of dependence and for identifying risk factors for drug abuse. One such risk factor is biological sex, which strongly moderates drug self‐administration behavior in rodents. Female rodents are more likely to acquire drug self‐administration behaviors, consume higher amounts of drug, and reinstate drug‐seeking behavior more readily. Despite this female vulnerability, preclinical addiction research has largely been done in male animals. The study of sex differences in rodent models of addictive behavior is increasing, however, as more investigators are choosing to include both male and female animals in experiments. This commentary is meant to serve as an introductory guide for preclinical investigators new to the study of sex differences in addiction. We provide an overview of self‐administration models, a broad view of female versus male self‐administration behaviors, and suggestions for study design and implementation. Inclusion of female subjects in preclinical addiction research is timely, as problem drug and alcohol use in women is increasing. With proper attention, design, and analysis, the study of sex differences in addiction has the potential to uncover novel neural mechanisms and lead to greater translational success for addiction research. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC

No abstract

Background: One characteristic of alcohol use disorder is compulsive drinking or drinking despite negative consequences. When quinine is used to model such aversionresistant drinking, female rodents typically are more resistant to punishment than males. Using an operant response task where C57BL/6J responded for ethanol mixed with quinine, we previously demonstrated that female mice tolerate higher concentrations of quinine in ethanol than males. Here, we aimed to determine whether this female vulnerability to aversion-resistant drinking behavior is similarly observed with footshock punishment.Methods: Male and female C57BL/6J mice were trained to respond for 10% ethanol in an operant task on a fixed-ratio three schedule. After consistent responding, mice were tested in a punishment session using either a 0.25 mA or 0.35 milliamp (mA) footshock. To assess footshock sensitivity, a subset of mice underwent a flinch, jump, and vocalize test in which behavioral responses to increasing amplitudes of footshock (0.05 to 0.95 mA) were assessed. In a separate cohort of mice, males and females were trained to respond for 2.5% sucrose and responses were punished using a 0.25 mA footshock.Results: Males and females continued to respond for 10% ethanol when paired with a 0.25 mA footshock. Females alone continued to respond for ethanol when a 0.35 mA footshock was delivered. Both males and females reduced responding for 2.5% sucrose when punished with a 0.25 mA footshock. Footshock sensitivity in the flinch, jump, and vocalize test did not differ by sex. Conclusions:Females continue to respond for 10% ethanol despite a 0.35 mA footshock, and this behavior is not due to differences in footshock sensitivity between males and females. These results show that female C57BL/6J mice are generally more resistant to punishment in an operant self-administration paradigm. The findings add to the literature characterizing aversion-resistant alcohol-drinking behaviors in females.

Background: One characteristic of alcohol use disorder (AUD) is compulsive drinking, or drinking despite negative consequences. When quinine is used to model such aversion resistant drinking, female rodents typically are more resistant to punishment than males. Using an operant response task where C57BL/6J responded for ethanol (EtOH) mixed with quinine, we previously demonstrated that female mice tolerate higher concentrations of quinine in EtOH than males. Here, we aimed to determine if this female vulnerability to aversion resistant drinking behavior is similarly observed when footshock punishment is used. Methods: Male and female C57BL/6J mice were trained to respond for 10% EtOH in an operant task on a fixed ratio 3 schedule. After consistent responding, mice were tested in a punishment session using either a 0.25 mA or 0.35 mA footshock. To assess footshock sensitivity, a subset of mice underwent a flinch, jump, vocalize test in which behavioral responses to increasing amplitudes of footshock (0.05 to 0.95 mA) were assessed. In a separate cohort of mice, males and females were trained to respond for 2.5% sucrose and responses were punished using a 0.25 mA footshock. Results: Males and females continued to respond for 10% EtOH when paired with a 0.25 mA footshock. Females alone continued to respond for EtOH when a 0.35 mA footshock was delivered. Both males and females reduced responding for 2.5% sucrose when punished with a 0.25 mA footshock. Finally, footshock sensitivity in the flinch, jump, vocalize test did not differ by sex. Conclusions: Females continue to respond for 10% EtOH despite a 0.35 mA footshock and this behavior is not due to differences in footshock sensitivity between males and females. These results suggest that female C57BL/6J mice are generally more resistant to punishment in an operant self-administration paradigm. These results add to the literature characterizing aversion resistant alcohol drinking behaviors in females.