Mitigating risk-of-readmission of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) patients within 30 days of discharge is important because such readmissions are not only expensive but also critical indicator of provider care and quality of treatment. Accurately predicting the risk-of-readmission may allow hospitals to identify high-risk patients and eventually improve quality of care by identifying factors that contribute to such readmissions in many scenarios. In this paper, we investigate the problem of predicting risk-of-readmission as a supervised learning problem, using a multi-layer classification approach. Earlier contributions inadequately attempted to assess a risk value for 30 day readmission by building a direct predictive model as opposed to our approach. We first split the problem into various stages, (a) at risk in general (b) risk within 60 days (c) risk within 30 days, and then build suitable classifiers for each stage, thereby increasing the ability to accurately predict the risk using multiple layers of decision. The advantage of our approach is that we can use different classification models for the subtasks that are more suited for the respective problems. Moreover, each of the subtasks can be solved using different features and training data leading to a highly confident diagnosis or risk compared to a one-shot single layer approach. An experimental evaluation on actual hospital patient record data from Multicare Health Systems shows that our model is significantly better at predicting risk-of-readmission of CHF patients within 30 days after discharge compared to prior attempts.

We study the problem of group recommendation. Recommendation is an important information exploration paradigm that retrieves interesting items for users based on their profiles and past activities. Single user recommendation has received significant attention in the past due to its extensive use in Amazon and Netflix. How to recommend to a group of users who may or may not share similar tastes, however, is still an open problem. The need for group recommendation arises in many scenarios: a movie for friends to watch together, a travel destination for a family to spend a holiday break, and a good restaurant for colleagues to have a working lunch. Intuitively, items that are ideal for recommendation to a group may be quite different from those for individual members. In this paper, we analyze the desiderata of group recommendation and propose a formal semantics that accounts for both item relevance to a group and disagreements among group members. We design and implement algorithms for efficiently computing group recommendations. We evaluate our group recommendation method through a comprehensive user study conducted on Amazon Mechanical Turk and demonstrate that incorporating disagreements is critical to the effectiveness of group recommendation. We further evaluate the efficiency and scalability of our algorithms on the MovieLens data set with 10M ratings.

A number of emerging applications, such as, collaborative document editing, sentence translation, and citizen journalism require workers with complementary skills and expertise to form groups and collaborate on complex tasks. While existing research has investigated task assignment for knowledge intensive crowdsourcing, they often ignore the aspect of collaboration among workers, that is central to the success of such tasks. Research in behavioral psychology has indicated that large groups hinder successful collaboration. Taking that into consideration, our work is one of the first to investigate and formalize the notion of collaboration among workers and present theoretical analyses to understand the hardness of optimizing task assignment. We propose efficient approximation algorithms with provable theoretical guarantees and demonstrate the superiority of our algorithms through a comprehensive set of experiments using real-world and synthetic datasets. Finally, we conduct a real world collaborative sentence translation application using Amazon Mechanical Turk that we hope provides a template for evaluating collaborative crowdsourcing tasks in micro-task based crowdsourcing platforms.

No abstract

Abstract-1 Planning an itinerary when traveling to a city involves substantial effort in choosing Points-of-Interest (POIs), deciding in which order to visit them, and accounting for the time it takes to visit each POI and transit between them. Several online services address different aspects of itinerary planning but none of them provides an interactive interface where users give feedbacks and iteratively construct their itineraries based on personal interests and time budget. In this paper, we formalize interactive itinerary planning as an iterative process where, at each step: (1) the user provides feedback on POIs selected by the system, (2) the system recommends the best itineraries based on all feedback so far, and (3) the system further selects a new set of POIs, with optimal utility, to solicit feedback for, at the next step. This iterative process stops when the user is satisfied with the recommended itinerary. We show that computing an itinerary is NP-complete even for simple itinerary scoring functions, and that POI selection is NP-complete. We develop heuristics and optimizations for a specfic case where the score of an itinerary is proportional to the number of desired POIs it contains. Our extensive experiments show that our algorithms are efficient and return high quality itineraries.