The aim of this study was to analyze human sperm motility, viability, and morphology before and after cryopreservation. This true laboratory experimental study had pre and post randomized one group design. The study was conducted at the Embryology, Andrology, and Genetics Laboratory, Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga from August to November 2017. The eighteen samples of fresh semen were collected from male volunteers who agreed and signed the informed consent of the study. Samples were analyzed their motility, viability, and morphology before and after cryopreservation. Results of this study indicated differentiation between motility before and after cryopreservation. Cryopreservation process decreased progressive motility (42.22 + 9.46%; 17.83 + 6.24%; p< 0.0001) and increased the number of immotile spermatozoa (35.44 + 10.15%; 60.11 + 12.53%; p< 0.0001). Cryopreservation also decreased human sperm viability (73.78 + 8.91%; 40.83 + 12.89%; p< 0.0001) and morphology (10.94 + 4.96%; 7.39 + 3.90%; p< 0.0001). Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa caused the decreased of motility, viability, and morphology.
The examination of sperm concentration in the laboratory is the calculation of the number and motility using a microscope or using a device. There are still some clinicians who doubt the accuracy of the sperm count results using a semen analyzer rather than using the manual method. This study aims is to determine the differences of the sperm concentration examination between the manual method and the automatic method. Subjects in this study were patients who carried out semen analysis tests at the Clinical Pathology Laboratory of RSIA "Restu Ibu" Sragen from June to August 2020. The object of this research is the examination of sperm concentration, using a manual method using a hemocytometer and an automatic method using the LensHooke ™ SQA X1 Pro. The results of statistical tests using the Mann Whitney methods show that the significance value (p) was 0.960, which means that there was no difference in the results of the sperm concentration examination between the manual method and the automatic method. Result of this research shows that there is no weakness or significant difference if compared between manual and automatic methods.
Kriopreservasi akan mengganggu struktur dan fungsi spermatozoa. Preparasi semen mampu menghasilkan spermatozoa dengan kualitas baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh preparasi semen dengan density gradient centrifugation (DGC) pra-freezing terhadap kualitas spermatozoa pasca-thawing. Penelitian dilakukan di boratorium Biologi Kedokteran, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Airlangga periode November 2017-Januari 2018. Penelitian eksperimental laboratoris dilakukan menggunakan cairan ejakulat volunter pria infertil. Semua sampel dibagi menjadi dua bagian, kelompok kontrol serta kelompok perlakuan berupa preparasi mini DGC. Setelah penambahan krioprotektan, selanjutnya dilakukan freezing. Pemeriksaan kualitas spermatozoa, meliputi motilitas, viabilitas serta persentase morfologi normal menggunakan metode WHO 2010, baik pra-freezing maupun pasca-thawing. Persentase perubahan kualitas spermatozoa pasca-thawing kedua kelompok dibandingkan menggunakan uji t dan bermakna jika nilai p<0,05. Total 20 sampel cairan ejakulat digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Persentase penurunan motilitas progresif, motilitas total, serta viabilitas pascathawing antara kedua kelompok tidak berbeda bermakna dengan nilai p masing-masing 0,422; 0,873 serta 0,432. Namun, penurunan persentase morfologi normal pasca-thawing pada kelompok kontrol jauh lebih besar daripada kelompok perlakuan dengan nilai p<0,001. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa preparasi semen berupa mini DGC pra-freezing mampu menghasilkan spermatozoa pasca-thawing dengan persentase morfologi normal yang lebih baik daripada protokol direct freezing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.