This study tested the hypothesis that exercise elicits monocytic cytokine expression and that prolonged cold exposure modulates such responses. Nine men (age, 24.6 +/- 3.8 y; VO(2 peak), 56.8 +/- 5.6 ml. kg(-1). min(-1)) completed 7 days of exhausting exercise (aerobic, anaerobic, resistive) and underwent three cold, wet exposures (CW). CW trials comprised =6 h (six 1-h rest-work cycles) exposure to cold (5 degrees C, 20 km/h wind) and wet (5 cm/h rain) conditions. Blood samples for the determination of intracellular and serum cytokine levels and circulating hormone concentrations were drawn at rest (0700), after exercise (approximately 1130), and after CW (~2000). Whole blood was incubated with (stimulated) or without (spontaneous) lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 1 microgram/ml) and stained for CD14 monocyte surface antigens. Cell suspensions were stained for intracellular cytokine expression and analyzed by flow cytometry. The proportion of CD14(+) monocytes exhibiting spontaneous and stimulated intracellular expression of interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha increased after exercise, but these cells produced less IL-1beta and TNF-alpha after CW when CW was preceded by exhausting exercise. Serum cytokine concentrations followed a parallel trend. These findings suggest that blood monocytes contribute to exercise-induced cytokinemia and that cold exposure can differentially modulate cytokine production, upregulating expression of IL-6 and IL-1 receptor antagonist but downregulating IL-1beta and TNF-alpha. The cold-induced changes in cytokine expression appear to be linked to enhanced catecholamine secretion associated with cold exposure.
The contribution of hyperthermia to the differential leukocytosis of exercise remains obscure. This study examined changes in circulating sympathoadrenal hormone concentrations and patterns of leukocyte and lymphocyte subset (CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+), CD19(+), CD3(-)16(+)/56(+)) redistribution during exercise, with and without a significant rise of rectal temperature (T(re)). Ten healthy men [age 26.9 +/- 5.7 (SD) yr, body mass 76.0 +/- 10.9 kg, body fat 13.9 +/- 4.6%, peak O(2) consumption: 48.0 +/- 12.4 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)] exercised for 40 min (65% peak O(2) consumption) during water immersion at 39 or 18 degrees C. T(re) increased from 37.2 to 39.3 degrees C (P < 0.0001) after 40 min of exercise in 39 degrees C water but was held constant to an increment of 0.5 degrees C during exercise in 18 degrees C water. Application of this thermal clamp reduced exercise-associated increments of plasma epinephrine (Epi) and norepinephrine (NE) by >50% (P < 0.05) and abolished the postexercise increase in cortisol. Thermal clamping also reduced the exercise-induced leukocytosis and lymphocytosis. Multiple regression demonstrated that T(re) had no direct association with lymphocyte subset mobilization but was significantly (P < 0.0001) correlated with hormone levels. Epi was an important determinant of total leukocytes, lymphocytes, and CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD3(-)CD16(+)/56(+) subset redistribution. The relationship between NE and lymphocyte subsets was weaker than that with Epi, with the exception of CD3(-)CD16(+)/56(+) counts, which were positively (P < 0.0001) related to NE. Cortisol was negatively associated with leukocytes, CD14(+) monocytes, and CD19(+) B- and CD4(+) T-cell subsets but was positively related to granulocytes. We conclude that hyperthermia mediates exercise-induced immune cell redistribution to the extent that it causes sympathoadrenal activation, with alterations in circulating Epi, NE, and cortisol.
Purpose: Blood biomarkers are a useful tool to study concussion. However, their interpretation is complicated by a number of potential biological confounds, including exercise. This is particularly relevant in military and athletic settings where injury commonly occurs during physical exertion. The impact of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on putative brain injury biomarkers remains under-examined. The purpose of this study was to observe the effects of HIIT on a panel of blood biomarkers associated with brain injury.Methods: Eleven healthy, recreationally active males (median age = 29.0, interquartile range = 26.0–31.5) performed HIIT on a bicycle ergometer (8-12 × 60-s intervals at 100% of peak power output, interspersed by 75-s recovery at 50 W) three times/week for 2 weeks. Peripheral blood samples were collected before and immediately after HIIT during the first and last training sessions. Plasma concentrations of s100 calcium-binding protein beta (S100B), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), neurogranin (NRGN), peroxiredoxin (PRDX)-6, creatine kinase-BB isoenzyme (CKBB), visinin-like protein (VILIP)-1, von Willebrand factor (vWF), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, and total tau (T-tau) were quantitated by high-sensitivity MULTI-SPOT® immunoassay, on the MesoScale Diagnostics electrochemiluminescence detection platform. Differences in biomarker concentrations in response to HIIT were evaluated by partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA) within a repeated-measures bootstrapped framework.Results: Ten of 12 biomarkers were increased pre-to-post HIIT; VILIP-1 remained unchanged, and GFAP was not statistically evaluated due to insufficient detectability. After 2 weeks of HIIT, T-tau was no longer significantly elevated pre-to-post HIIT, and significant attenuation was noted in the acute responses of NRGN, PRDX-6, MMP-9, and vWF. In addition, compared to session 1, session 6 pre-exercise concentrations of NSE and VILIP-1 were significantly lower and higher, respectively.Conclusion: Blood biomarkers commonly associated with brain injury are significantly elevated in response to a single bout of HIIT. After a 2-week, six-session training protocol, this response was attenuated for some, but not all markers. While biomarkers continue to provide promise to concussion research, future studies are necessary to disentangle the common biological sequelae to both exercise and brain injury.
This study examined the hypothesis that several days of exhaustive exercise would impair thermoregulatory effector responses to cold exposure, leading to an accentuated core temperature reduction compared with exposure of the same individual to cold in a rested condition. Thirteen men (10 experimental and 3 control) performed a cold-wet walk (CW) for up to 6 h (6 rest-work cycles, each 1 h in duration) in 5 degrees C air on three occasions. One cycle of CW consisted of 10 min of standing in the rain (5.4 cm/h) followed by 45 min of walking (1.34 m/s, 5.4 m/s wind). Clothing was water saturated at the start of each walking period (0.75 clo vs. 1.1 clo when dry). The initial CW trial (day 0) was performed (afternoon) with subjects rested before initiation of exercise-cold exposure. During the next 7 days, exhaustive exercise (aerobic, anaerobic, resistive) was performed for 4 h each morning. Two subsequent CW trials were performed on the afternoon of days 3 and 7, approximately 2.5 h after cessation of fatiguing exercise. For controls, no exhaustive exercise was performed on any day. Thermoregulatory responses and body temperature during CW were not different on days 0, 3, and 7 in the controls. In the experimental group, mean skin temperature was higher (P < 0.05) during CW on days 3 and 7 than on day 0. Rectal temperature was lower (P < 0.05) and the change in rectal temperature was greater (P < 0.05) during the 6th h of CW on day 3. Metabolic heat production during CW was similar among trials. Warmer skin temperatures during CW after days 3 and 7 indicate that vasoconstrictor responses to cold, but not shivering responses, are impaired after multiple days of severe physical exertion. These findings suggest that susceptibility to hypothermia is increased by exertional fatigue.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.