Restless legs syndrome (RLS) involves abnormal limb sensations that diminish with motor activity, worsen at rest, have a circadian peak in expression in the evening and at night, and can severely disrupt sleep. Primary treatment is directed at CNS dopaminergic systems, particularly activation of D(2)-like (D(2), D(3), and D(4)) receptors. Although RLS affects 2% to 15% of the general population, the neural circuitry contributing to RLS remains speculative, and there is currently no accepted animal model to enable detailed mechanistic analyses. Traditional views suggest that RLS arises from supraspinal sources which favor facilitation of the flexor reflex and emergence of the RLS phenotype. The authors forward the hypothesis that RLS reflects a dysfunction of the little-studied dorsoposterior hypothalamic dopaminergic A11 cell group. They assert that, as the sole source of spinal dopamine, reduced drive in this system can lead to spinal network changes wholly consistent with RLS. The authors summarize their recent investigations on spinal cord dopamine dysfunction that rely on lesions centered on A11, and on studies in D(3) receptor knockout (D(3)KO) mice. Excessive locomotor behavior is evident in both sets of animals, and D(3)KO mice exhibit facilitation rather than the expected depression of spinal reflexes in the presence of dopamine as well as a reversal in their circadian expression of the rate-limiting enzyme for dopamine synthesis, tyrosine hydroxylase. Taken together, these findings are consistent with an involvement of spinal dopamine dysfunction in the etiology of RLS, and they argue that the D(3)KO mouse might serve as a relevant animal model to study the underlying mechanisms of RLS.

No abstract

Dopamine is a catecholaminergic neuromodulatory transmitter that acts through five molecularlydistinct G protein-coupled receptor subtypes (D 1 -D 5 ). In the mammalian spinal cord, dopaminergic axon collaterals arise predominantly from the A11 region of the dorsoposterior hypothalamus and project diffusely throughout the spinal neuraxis. Dopaminergic modulatory actions are implicated in sensory, motor and autonomic functions in the spinal cord but the expression properties of the different dopamine receptors in the spinal cord remain incomplete. Here we determined the presence and the regional distribution of all dopamine receptor subtypes in mouse spinal cord cells by means of quantitative real time PCR and digoxigenin-label in situ hybridization. Real-time PCR demonstrated that all dopamine receptors are expressed in the spinal cord with strongly dominant D 2 receptor expression, including in motoneurons and in the sensory encoding superficial dorsal horn (SDH). Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) corroborated the predominance of D 2 receptor expression in SDH and motoneurons. In situ hybridization of lumbar cord revealed that expression for all dopamine receptors was largely in the gray matter, including motoneurons, and distributed diffusely in labeled cell subpopulations in most or all laminae. The highest incidence of cellular labeling was observed for D 2 and D 5 receptors, while the incidence of D 1 and D 3 receptor expression was least. We conclude that the expression and extensive postsynaptic distribution of all known dopamine receptors in spinal cord corresponds well with the broad descending dopaminergic projection territory supporting an widespread dopaminergic control over spinal neuronal systems. The dominant expression of D 2 receptors suggests a leading role for these receptors in dopaminergic actions on postsynaptic spinal neurons. Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. (Joyce, 1983, Jackson and Westlind-Danielsson, 1994, Jaber et al., 1996, Missale et al., 1998. NIH Public AccessThe distribution of individual dopamine receptor subtypes has been analyzed in much detail, using immunohistochemistry, receptor ligand binding, or in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques. Most of this research has focused on the brain (Meador-Woodruff and Mansour, 1991, Weiner et al., 1991, Bergson et al., 1995, Yung et al., 1995, Gurevich and Joyce, 1999, Hurd et al., 2001, Kumar and Patel, 2007.There are extensive dopaminergic projections in the spinal cord (Skagerberg et al., 1982, Skagerberg and Bjorklund, 1985, Skagerberg et al., 1988, and a number of au...

A new, scalable process for microfabrication of a silicone-based, elastic multi-electrode array (MEA) is presented. The device is constructed by spinning poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) silicone elastomer onto a glass slide, depositing and patterning gold to construct wires and electrodes, spinning on a second PDMS layer, and then micropatterning the second PDMS layer to expose electrode contacts. The micropatterning of PDMS involves a custom reactive ion etch (RIE) process that preserves the underlying gold thin film. Once completed, the device can be removed from the glass slide for conformal interfacing with neural tissue. Prototype MEAs feature electrodes smaller than those known to be reported on silicone substrate (60 μm diameter exposed electrode area) and were capable of selectively stimulating the surface of the in vitro isolated spinal cord of the juvenile rat. Stretchable serpentine traces were also incorporated into the functional PDMS-based MEA, and their implementation and testing is described.

We utilized an in vitro adult mouse extensor digitorum longus (EDL) nerve-attached preparation to characterize the responses of muscle spindle afferents to ramp-and-hold stretch and sinusoidal vibratory stimuli. Responses were measured at both room (24°C) and muscle body temperature (34°C). Muscle spindle afferent static firing frequencies increased linearly in response to increasing stretch lengths to accurately encode the magnitude of muscle stretch (tested at 2.5%, 5% and 7.5% of resting length [Lo]). Peak firing frequency increased with ramp speeds (20% Lo/sec, 40% Lo/sec, and 60% Lo/sec). As a population, muscle spindle afferents could entrain 1:1 to sinusoidal vibrations throughout the frequency (10–100 Hz) and amplitude ranges tested (5–100 µm). Most units preferentially entrained to vibration frequencies close to their baseline steady-state firing frequencies. Cooling the muscle to 24°C decreased baseline firing frequency and units correspondingly entrained to slower frequency vibrations. The ramp component of stretch generated dynamic firing responses. These responses and related measures of dynamic sensitivity were not able to categorize units as primary (group Ia) or secondary (group II) even when tested with more extreme length changes (10% Lo). We conclude that the population of spindle afferents combines to encode stretch in a smoothly graded manner over the physiological range of lengths and speeds tested. Overall, spindle afferent response properties were comparable to those seen in other species, supporting subsequent use of the mouse genetic model system for studies on spindle function and dysfunction in an isolated muscle-nerve preparation.