Pouch and Roux-en-Y reconstruction is the most useful of the three procedures for improving the postoperative quality of life. In patients with pouch and interposition reconstruction, the clinical assessment was quite poor, even though it is a physiologic route.

Background. The prognostic significance of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) determination in patients with gastric cancer has been controversial. Methods. The correlation between preoperative serum CEA levels and clinicopathologic factors was evaluated in 865 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy between 1980 and 1990. The authors also investigated whether preoperative CEA levels represented a prognostic parameter using Cox's proportional hazard model. Results. Of the 865 patients, 249 (28.8%) were positive for CEA. The positivity rate was higher in the elderly, in male patients whose tumors were located in the lower third of the stomach, and in those with Borrmann types 2 and 3. It was also significantly correlated with tumor size, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, peritoneal and liver metastases, and cancer stage. The higher the serum CEA level, the more advanced the cancer stage, and the rate of curative resection also decreased as CEA levels were elevated. There was a significant difference between patients with CEA levels below 10 ng/ml and those with levels exceeding 10 ng/ml with regard to tumor progression and curability. Multivariate analysis showed a strong and highly significant association between preoperative serum CEA level and survival time. The prognosis was also significantly poorer when the CEA level was above 10 ng/ml, even in patients in the same stage (Stages 1, 2, and 3). Conclusions. Preoperative serum CEA determination in patients with gastric cancer valuable for predicting tumor progression and prognosis. Further, in patients in Stages 1, 2, and 3, CEA levels exceeding 10 ng/ml are clinically significant and provide more prognostic information than that obtained by conventional staging methods. Cancer 1994; 73:2703–8.

The authors modified the operative procedures used in pouch and interposition (PI) reconstruction in an attempt to improve the surgical results after total gastrectomy, because a randomized controlled trial had revealed that the clinical assessment of PI was quite poor, even though it is a physiological route. In most of the treated patients, the gastric emptying test revealed delayed emptying, and an X-ray video film showed folding and twisting of the jejunal conduit between the pouch and duodenum, which disturbed the transmission of nutrition. Modified PI (m-PI) was performed by decreasing the length of the jejunal conduit and widening the mesenteric pedicle to preserve the blood and nerve supply. This procedure was retrospectively compared with the previously used PI reconstruction by evaluating the postprandial symptoms, food intake, body weight, serum nutritional parameters, and emptying time of the gastric substitute. The m-PI group (n = 6) showed a lower incidence of symptoms, a greater food intake, and a greater weight recovery than the PI group (n = 6). The gastric emptying test also revealed an acceptable degree of emptying. We thus conclude that the m-PI reconstruction is more useful for improving the postoperative quality of life than the previously used method of PI reconstruction.

No abstract

No abstract