Coronary atherosclerosis (CAS) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) share common risk factors. The existing CAS may not only increase the possibility of GERD to be refractory GERD (RGERD), but also increase the risk of antireflux surgery for these patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of CAS and its potential risk factors in patients with RGERD ready for antireflux surgery. The retrospective analysis was performed in the digestive disease center of Suining Central Hospital, a teritary hospital in Sichuan, China. Records of patients with RGERD admitted to the hospital for antireflux surgery between July 2018, and June 2021 were included. The included patients were divided into the RGERD group and RGERD-CAS group based on the coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) results, which were defined as no CAS and CAS (<50% mild stenosis or ≥50% significant stenosis). In total, 448 patients with RGERD qualified for the study. The prevalence of CAS in these patients was 45.1%. Specifically, 246 patients (54.9%) were in the RGERD group, and 202 patients (45.1%) were in the RGERD-CAS group. Among these 202 patients with CAS, 120 patients (59.4%) had mild CAS (<50% stenosis), 82 patients (40.6%) had significant CAS (≥50% stenosis). Five independent risk factors, including male sex, high blood pressure (HBP), diabetes mellitus (DM), Barrett's esophagus (BE) and family history of coronary artery disease were identified for the occurrence of CAS in patients with RGERD ready for antireflux surgery after adjusting for other factors. CAS is prevalent in patients with RGERD ready for antireflux surgery. Routing CTTA was suggested to exclude potential coronary artery disease in RGERD patients ready for antireflux surgery with independent risk factors.

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been reported to be a minimally invasive effective method for the treatment of secondary hypersplenism. However, neither the short-term efficacy nor the indications and/or contraindications have been described in patients with cirrhosis. From October 2019 to May 2021, eleven cases of patients with cirrhotic secondary hypersplenism were enrolled. The blood counts, liver function tests and abdominal ultrasound and/or MRI scans of all patients were closely evaluated. Among these 11 patients, eight (72.7%) patients were classified as Child–Pugh A, and the other 3 (27.3%) patients were Child–Pugh B; Five (45%) patients were diagnosed with gallstone, including multiple small stones in 2 patients and single stone in 3 patients. HIFU was performed successfully in all 11 patients. After HIFU, hematologic parameters and liver function were significantly improved in all 11 patients (p < 0.05). The HIFU ablated volume to spleen volume rate was 35–61%. Complications were ecchymosis of the waist in 7 (63.3%) patients, ablated area pain in 3 (27.3%) patients, and choledocholithiasis in 2 (18.2%) patients with multiple small gallstones. All of them recovered smoothly without additional treatment except for 2 patients with choledocholithiasis recovered with risky endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) treatment. This series suggested that HIFU is an effective and safe treatment for cirrhotic secondary hypersplenism in patients classified as Child–Pugh A or B. However, multiple small gallstones could be a relative contraindication for it.

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been reported to be a minimally invasive effective method for the treatment of secondary hypersplenism. However, neither the short-term efficacy nor the indications and/or contraindications have been described in patients with cirrhosis. From October 2019 to May 2021, eleven cases of patients with cirrhotic secondary hypersplenism were enrolled. The blood counts, liver function tests and abdominal ultrasound and/or MRI scans of all patients were closely evaluated. Among these 11 patients, eight (72.7%) patients were classified as Child-Pugh A, and the other 3 (27.3%) patients were Child-Pugh B; Five (45%) patients were diagnosed with gallstone, including multiple small stones in 2 patients and single stone in 3 patients. HIFU was performed successfully in all 11 patients. After HIFU, hematologic parameters and liver function were significantly improved in all 11 patients (p < 0.05). The HIFU ablated volume to spleen volume rate was 35%-61%. Complications were ecchymosis of the waist in 7 (63.3%) patients, ablated area pain in 3 (27.3%) patients, and choledocholithiasis in 2 (18.2%) patients with multiple small gallstones. All of them recovered smoothly without additional treatment except for 2 patients with choledocholithiasis recovered with risky endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) treatment. This series suggested that HIFU is an effective and safe treatment for cirrhotic secondary hypersplenism in patients classified as Child-Pugh A or B. However, multiple small gallstones could be a relative contraindication for it.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common comorbidity of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Since the distal esophagus and heart share a common afferent vagal supply, the delivery of radiofrequency in the distal esophagus can stimulate the coronary artery and induce acute myocardial infarction in a patient with CAD.

Background Medical treatment plays a main role in the treatment of Jackhammer esophagus (JE). The efficacy of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) combined with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the treatment of JE has not been established. Methods This 8-week randomized, open-label study was conducted in an outpatient setting in China. Patients with symptomatic JE were randomly assigned to receive diltiazem combined with lansoprazole (DL group) or diltiazem alone (D group). The primary outcome was the response rate after 8 weeks. Secondary outcomes included symptoms, quality of life, manometric pattern and reflux status. Key Results Forty patients were randomized, 38 (95.0%) of whom completed the study (20 patients in the DL group, and 18 were randomized to the D group). A higher response rate was found in the DL group than in the D group (85.0% vs. 55.0%, p= 0.038). All secondary outcomes, including overall symptom control, quality of life, and reflux control, were significantly better in the DL group than in the D group after 8 weeks (p<0.05), except the distal contractile integral (DCI) (p=0.274). Conclusions Diltiazem combined with lansoprazole is superior to diltiazem alone in obtaining treatment response and correcting abnormal reflux situations in patients with symptomatic JE.