This paper brings together sociological theories of culture and gender to answer the question-how do large-scale development interventions induce cultural change? Through three years of ethnographic work in rural Bihar, the authors examine this question in the context of Jeevika, a World Bank-assisted poverty alleviation project targeted at women, and find support for an integrative view of culture. The paper argues that Jeevika created new "cultural configurations" by giving economically and socially disadvantaged women access to a well-defined network of people and new systems of knowledge, which changed women's habitus and broke down normative restrictions constitutive of the symbolic boundary of gender.
Recasting Culture to Undo
Executive SummaryThis paper examines the nexus between development and culture. We try to understand the process by which a large-scale anti-poverty intervention, in a very poor and patriarchal region of India, induced a cascading set of changes that led to the empowerment of women. Through three years of qualitative fieldwork in rural Bihar, we examine this in the context of Jeevika, a with respect to existing inequalities -the state is one of the poorest in India, the population is almost 50% illiterate, and gender and caste hierarchies are oppressive -making cultural change very hard. Third, our quantitative analysis of Phase1 of Jeevika suggests that it had considerable impact on women's empowerment both within the household, and in the public sphere. In this paper we dig further and ask -what are the processes and mechanisms of change that remain invisible in the quantitative study, but result in the social impact captured by it.By relying on qualitative data (semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions with members, non-members and key stakeholders, as well as participant observation of group activities), collected in four villages (i.e. two matched pairs of treatment and control villages) in the first phase of Jeevika over a three-year period i.e. from 2011 to 2015, we find support for an integrative view of culture. Comparing two pairs of treatment and control villages, we find that, by giving women privileged access to a) symbolic resources (that facilitate the formation of a new identity anchored in the SHG, rather than caste or kinship), b) physical resources (such as group money, access to credit and passbooks), and c) an associated institutional environment (SHGs, VOs, CLFs, etc.), Jeevika cultivated new cultural competencies and capabilities that defied the traditional conventions of gender. Combined together, they give economically and socially disadvantaged women access to a well-defined network of people (women cutting across caste and religious boundaries, and both within and outside the village) and access to new systems of 'knowledge' with which they can challenge old generationally transmitted cultural systems that are more concerned with preserving boundaries rather than disrupting them. These changes manifest themselves most dramatically in the process...