Introdução: Atualmente, os índices do edentulismo diminuíram, embora a preocupação pela reabilitação dentária aumentaram, o que gera foco de estudos sobre as expectativas que essa população procura os serviços dessa área da odontologia. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi fazer uma revisão de literatura sobre os impactos psicossociais que a estética dentária pode causar na qualidade de vida de sujeitos que são submetidos a próteses convencionais e sobre implantes. Método: Foram selecionados artigos disponíveis na base de dados MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System on-line) publicados em inglês, no período compreendido entre 2008-2018; Resultados: Os principais resultados encontrados foi que a estética dentária tem influência direta na autoestima e por isso os indivíduos sofrem com uma barreira pessoal e profissional, manifestando negativamente na sua qualidade de vida. Porém, população que são reabilitados com próteses sobre implantes parece ter maior preocupação com sua estética e por isso sofreram mais com depressão, ao passo que isso aumenta quando se trata de dentes posicionados anteriormente na arcada dentária. Conclusão: Conclui-se que a estética dentária influencia psicossocialmente em um indivíduo, causando impactos na qualidade de vida de edêntulos, além disso, há diferenças psicológicas na população que busca reabilitação com próteses convencionais e implantossuportadas e a posição que os dentes perdidos ocupavam no arco dentário.Descritores: Próteses e Implantes; Estética Dentária; Qualidade de Vida.ReferênciasGavric A, Mirceta D, Jakobovic M, Pavlic A, Zrinski MT, Spalj S. Cranio dento facial characteristics, dental esthetics–related quality of life, and self-esteem. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;147(6):711-18.Fava J, Lin M, Zahran M, Jokstad A. Single implant‐supported crowns in the aesthetic zone: patient satisfaction with aesthetic appearance compared with appraisals by laypeople and dentists. Clin Oral implants Res. 2015;26(10): 1113-20.de Couto Nascimento V, de Castro Ferreira Conti AC, de Almeida Cardoso M, Valarelli DP, de Almeida-Pedrin RR. Impact of orthodontic treatment on self-esteem and quality of life of adult patients requiring oral rehabilitation. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(5):883-85.Pereira CP, Abreu LG, Dickc BD, de Luca Canto G, Paiva SM, Flores-Mir C. Patient satisfaction after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery: A systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(3):495-508.Chen P, Yu S, Zhu G. The psychosocial impacts of implantation on the dental aesthetics of missing anterior teeth patients. Br Dent J. 2012; 213(11):E20Benic GI, Wolleb K, Sancho-Puchades M, Hämmerle CH. Systematic review of parameters and methods for the professional assessment of aesthetics in dental implant research. Clin Oral implants Res. 2012; 39(Suppl 12):160-92.Peñarrocha MA, Carrillo C, Boronat A, Martí EM. Level of satisfaction in patients with maxillary mull-arch fixed protheses: zigomatic versus convencional implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22(5):769-73.Benson PE, Da'as T, Johal A, Mandall NA, Williams AC, Baker SR et al. Relationships between dental appearance, selfesteem, socio-economic status, and oral healthrelated quality of life in UK schoolchildren: A 3-year cohort study. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(5):481-90.Alzarea B. Oral health related quality-of-life outcomes of partially edentulous patients treated with implant-supported single crowns or fixed partial dentures J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(5):666-71.Frejmant MW, Vargas IA, Rösing CK, Closs LQ. Dentofacial deformities are associated with lower degrees of self-esteem and higher impact on oral health-related quality of life: results from na observational study involving adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2013;71(4):763-67.Rotundo R, Nieri M, Bonaccini D, Mori M, Lamberti E, Massironi D et al. The Smile Esthetic Index (SEI): a method to measure the esthetics of the smile. an intra-rater and inter-rater agreement study. Eur J Oral Implantol.2015; 8(4):397-403.Clijmans M, Lemiere J, Fieuws S, Willems G. Impact of self-esteem and personality traits on the association between orthodontic treatment need and oral health-related quality of life in adults seeking orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(6):643-50.Cardoso RG, Melo LA, Barbosa GA, Calderon PD, Germano AR, Mestriner W Junior et al. Impact of mandibular conventional denture and overdenture on quality of life and masticatory efficiency. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30(1):e102.Perillo L, Esposito M, Caprioglio A, Attanasio S, Santini AC, Carotenuto M. Orthodontic treatment need for adolescents in the Campania region: the malocclusion impact on self-concept. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014;8:353-59.Patel P, Brown S, Nazarian A. A better quality of life with implant-retained overdentures. Dent Today. 2012;31(1):156,158.Torres BL, Costa FO, Modena CM, Cota LO, Côrtes MI, Seraidarian PI. Association between personality traits and quality oflife in patients treated with conventional mandibular dentures or implant-supported overdentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(6):454-61.Al-Omiri MK, Hammad OA, Lynch E, Lamey PJ, Clifford TJ. Impacts of implant treatment on daily living. Int Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26(4):877-86.Fernandez-Estevan LF, Selva-Otaolaurruchi EJ, Montero J, Sola-Ruiz F. Oral health-related quality of life of implant-supported overdentures versus conventional complete prostheses: Retrospective study of a cohort of edentulous patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20(4):e450-58.Komagamine Y, Kanazawa M, Kaiba Y, Sato Y, Minakuchi S, Sasaki Y. Association between self‐assessment of complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life. J Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39(11):847-57.Mukatash GN, Al-Rousan M, Al-Sakarna B. Needs and demands of prosthetic treatment among two groups of individuals. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21(4):564-67.Gerritsen AE, Allen PF, Witter DJ, Bronkhorst EM, Creugers NH. Toothlossand oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:126.Kershaw S, Newton JT, Williams DM. The influence of tooth colour on the perception sofpersona lcharacteristics among female dental patients: comparisons of unmodified, decayedand 'whitened' teeth. Br Dent J. 2008;204(5):E9.Towfighi PP, Brunsvold MA, Storey AT, Arnold RM, Willman DE, McMahan CA. Pathologic migration of anterior teeth in patients with moderate to severe periodontitis. J Periodontol. 1997;68(10):967-72.Tatum RC, Tatum BM, Marfatia-Rege AT, Amant KS. Immediate esthetic treatment for anterior teeth: reportof cases. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989; 118(5):575-77.Kapur A, Chawla HS, Goyal A, Gaube K. An esthetic point of view in very young children. J Clin Pediatr Dent.2005; 30(2):99-103.Ponsi J, Lahti S, Rissanen H, Oikarinen K. Change in subjective oral healthafter single dental implanttreatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011; 26(3):571-77.Shaw WC. Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1981;3(3):151-62.Sheats RD, McGorray SP, Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ. Occlusal traits and perceptionof orthodontic need in eighth grade students. Angle Orthod.1998;68(2):107-14.Al-Omiri MK, Karasneh JA, Lynch E, Lamey PJ, Clifford TJ. Impacts of missin gupper anterior teeth on daily living. Int Dent J.2009;59(3):127-32.Carlsson GE, Johansson A, Johansson AK, Ordell S, Ekbäck G, Unell L. Attitudes toward dental appearance in 50‑and 60‑year‑old subjects living in Sweden. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008; 20(1):46-55.Xiao J, Zhou X, Zhu WD, Zhang B, Li JY, Xu X. The prevalence of tooth discolouration and the self-satisfaction with tooth colour in a Chinese urban population. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34(5):351-60.Akarslan ZZ, Sadik B, Erten H, Karabulut E. Dental esthetic satisfaction, received and desired dental treatments for improvement of esthetics. Indian J Dent Res. 2009; 20(2):195-200.Wang SW, Repetti RL, Campos B. Job stress andfamily social behavior: themoderating role ofneuroticism. J Occup Health Psychol. 2011; 16(4):441-56.Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Geiger SB, Levin L. Patients’ satisfactionwith dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):805-8.Hassel A, Wegener I, Rolko C, Nitschke I. Self-rating of satisfaction with dental appearance in anelderly German population. Int Dent J. 2008; 58(2):98-102.Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC Oral Health.2011;11:6.
A cirurgia de terceiros molares, embora seja um procedimento rotineiro em nível ambulatorial pode evoluir para complicações trans ou pós-operatorias, as quais o cirurgião deverá estar apto para conduzir os casos da maneira mais adequada. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar a prevalência das complicações associados a terceiros molares em um serviço de referência no sertão paraibano, Brasil. Este estudo se trata de pesquisa retrospectiva com levantamentos de dados através de prontuários odontológicos, os quais para serem inclusos para análise deveriam estar preenchidos completamente e os pacientes terem se submetidos a exodontias de algum terceiro molar e acompanhado por pelo menos 07 dias pós-operatório. A amostra foi formada com 226 prontuários, os quais registram 483 desses tipos de exodontias. Verificou-se que as complicações tiveram uma prevalência geral de 8,9%, de forma que as mais frequentes foram fratura radicular (27,9%), alveolite (20,93%), parestesia do nervo alveolar inferior (18,6%), parestesia do nervo lingual (7,0%), hemorragia trans-operatória (7,0%), fratura do túber da maxila (4,65%), parestesia do nervo facial (2,32%), luxação da ATM (2,32%), fratura de broca (2,32%), hemorragia pós-operatória (2,32%), laceração de tecido mole (2,32%), e lipotínea (2,32%). Conclui-se que os pacientes na faixa etária de 16 a 25 anos, do gênero feminino foram os mais acometidos e a fratura radicular apresentou-se mais prevalente seguida da alveolite e parestesia do nervo alveolar inferior.Descritores: Prevalência; Cirurgia Bucal; Dente Serotino.ReferênciasCosta MG, Pazzini CA, Pantuzo MCG, Jorge MLR, Marques LS. Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review. Braz Oral Res. 2013;27(2):183-88.Chang SK, Perrott DH, Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Age as a risk factor for third molar surgery complications. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2007;65(9):1685-92.Haug RH, Perrott DH, Gonzalez ML, Talwar RM. The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Age-Related Third Molar Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1106-14.Mahdey HM, Arora S, Wei M. Prevalence and difficulty index associated with themandibular molar impaction among malaysian ethnicities: a clinico-radiographic study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(9):ZC65-8.Dias-Ribeiro E, Lima-Júnior JL, Barbosa JL, Haagsma IB, Lucena LBS, Marzola C. Avaliação das posições de terceiros molares retidos em relação à classificação de Winter. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2008;37(3):203-9.Kanneppady SK, Balamanikandasrinivasan, Kumaresan R, Sakri SB. A comparative study on radiographic analysis of impacted third molars among three ethnic groups of patients attending AIMST Dental Institute, Malaysia. Dent Res (Isfahan). 2013;10(3):353-58.Reddy KVG, Prasad KVV. Prevalence of third molar impactions in urban population of age 22-30 years in South India: an epidemological study. J Indian Dent Assoc. 2011;5(5):609-11.Al-Anqudi SM, Al-Sudairy S, Al-Hosni A, Al-Maniri A. Prevalence and pattern of third molar impaction - a retrospective study of radiographs in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2014;14(3):e388-e92.Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Risk factors for third molar extraction difficulty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(11):1363-71.Sursala MS, Blaeser BF, Magalnick D. Third molar surgery and associated complication. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin North Am. 2003;15(2):177-86.de Carvalho RW, de Araújo Filho RC, do Egito Vasconcelos BC. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted maxillary third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71(5):839-45.Osborn TP, Frederickson G Jr, Small IA, Torgerson TS. A Prospective study of complications related to mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43(10):767-69.Bui, CH, Seldin EB, Dodson TB. Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction. J. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61(12):1379-89.Chiapasco M, De Cicco L, Marrone G. Side effects and complications associates with third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2006;76(4):412-20.Kato RB, Bueno RBL, Oliveira Neto PJ, Ribeiro MC, Azenha MR. Acidentes e complicações associadas á cirurgia dos terceiros molares realizada por alunos de odontologia. Rev cir traumatol buco-maxilo-fac. 2010,;10(4):45-54.Bachmann H, Cáceres R, Muñoz C, Uribe S. Complicaciones en cirugía de terceros molares entre los años 2007-2010, en un hospital urbano, Chile. Int J Odontostomat. 2014;8(1):107-12.Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73(4):325.Pitekova, L.; Satko, I. & Novotnakova, D. Complications after third molar surgery. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2010;111(5):296-98.Benediktsdóttir IS, Wenzel A, Petersen JK, Hintze H. Mandibular third molar removal: Risk indicators for extended operation time, postoperative pain, and complications. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol, Oral Radiol, Endod. 2004;97(4):438-46.Hupp JR. Cirurgia oral maxilofacial contemporânea. 6. ed. Rio de Janeiro:Elsevier; 2015.Laskin D. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. St Louis:Mosby Co; 1985.Killey HC, Kay LW. The impacted wisdom tooth. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1975.Araujo OC, Agostinho CNLF, Marinho LMRF, Rabêlo LRS, Bastos EG, Silva VC. Incidência dos acidentes e complicações em cirurgias de terceiros molares. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2011;40(6):290-95.Oliveira LB, Schmidt DB, Assis AF, Gabrielli MAC, Hochuli-Vieira EH, Pereira Filho VAP. Avaliação dos acidentes e complicações associados à exodontias dos 3º molares. Rev cir traumatol buco-maxilo-fac. 2006;6(2):51-6.al-Khateeb TL, El-Marsafi AI, Butler NP. The relationship between the indications of the surgical removal of impacted third molars and incidence of alveolar osteitis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991;49(2):141-45.Alling CC 3rd. Dysesthesia of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;44(6):454-57.Mercier P, Precious D. Risk and benefits of removal of impacted third molars: a critical review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;21(1):17-27.Cheung LK, Leung YY, Chow LK, Wong MC, Chan EK, Fok YH. Incidence of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4,338 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39(4):320-26.Contar CM, de Oliveira P, Kanegusuku K, Berticelli RD, Azevedo-Alanis LR, Machado MA. Complications in third molar removal: a retrospective study of 588 patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(1):e74-8.Silveira KG, Costa FWG, Bezerra MF, Pimenta AVM, Carvalho FSR, Soares ECS. Sinais radiográficos preditivos de proximidade entre terceiro molar e canal mandibular através de tomografia computorizada. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac. 2016;57(1):30-7.Sebastiani, AM, Todero SRB, Gabardo G, Costa DJ, Rebelatto NLB, Scario R. Intraoperative accidents associated with surgical removal of third molars. Braz J Oral Sci. 2014;13(4):276-80Wofford DT, Miller RI. Prospective study of dysesthesia following odontectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45(1):15-9.Swanson AE. Removing the mandibular third molar: neurosensory deficits and consequent litigation. J Can Dent Assoc. 1989;55(5):383-86.Bouloux GF, Steed MB, Perciaccante VJ. Complications of third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin North Am. 2007; 19(1):117-28.Santos MESM, Martins CAM, Beltrao GC, Gallo TB. Paralisia do nervo facial após remoção de enxerto mandibular- relato de caso. Rev cir traumatol buco-maxilo-fac. 2006;6(3):33-8.Santiago JA, Martins Neto RS, Lima VN, Queiroz SBF, Carvalho ACGS, Magro Filho O. Avaliação dos cirurgiões-dentistas de Quixerobim sobre emergências médicas em consultório odontológico. Braz J Surg Clin Res – BJSCR. 2016, 13(1):23-8.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.