Blastocystis sp. is probably the most common enteric parasite in humans globally. Although the role of Blastocystis in human disease is still controversial, epidemiological and experimental evidence suggests that pathogenicity may be associated with certain subtypes of the protist. Since the life cycle of Blastocystis is maintained through still elusive pathways, companion animals have attracted the attention of researchers as potential reservoirs of human infections. In order to evaluate the risk of zoonotic transmission of Blastocystis, we investigated the occurrence and molecular diversity of this microorganism in human, canine and feline populations sharing temporal and spatial settings in the province of Álava, northern Spain. A total of 268 (including 179 human, 55 canine and 34 feline) faecal specimens were obtained from 63 family households during February-December 2014. Detection of Blastocystis was achieved by PCR amplification and sequencing of small subunit rRNA genes. Blastocystis was found in 35.2% (95% CI: 0.29%-0.42%) of the human stool samples analysed, but not in any of the canine or feline faecal specimens investigated. Out of the 63 PCR-positive human samples, 84.1% (53/63) were successfully subtyped, allowing the identification of the subtypes ST2 (62.3%), ST3 (17.0%), ST1 (13.2%) and ST4 (7.5%). No mixed subtype infections were identified. Blastocystis carriage was independent of the gender and region of origin of the affected individuals, but children in the age groups of >5-10 years and >10-15 years were significantly more affected by the protist. None of the risk factors considered (water-use practices, contact with livestock, contact with individual undergoing diarrhoeal episodes) were associated with increased prevalence of Blastocystis. Our data demonstrate that pet dogs and cats play a negligible role as natural reservoirs of human Blastocystis infection in this geographic region, although the applicability of these results should be corroborated in future molecular epidemiological studies.
Background Multiplex molecular panels are relentlessly replacing conventional methods for the detection of enteric pathogens from stool samples in clinical and research laboratories. Here we evaluated four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis / parvum , Giardia duodenalis and Entamoeba histolytica . Methods The diagnostic performance of the Gastroenteritis/Parasite Panel I (Diagenode), the RIDAGENE Parasitic Stool Panel (R-Biopharm), the Allplex Gastrointestinal Parasite Panel 4 (Seegene) and the FTD Stool Parasites (Fast Track) real-time PCR methods was assessed against a reference panel of 126 well-characterized DNA samples including Cryptosporidium hominis ( n = 29), Cryptosporidium parvum ( n = 3), Giardia duodenalis ( n = 47), Entamoeba histolytica ( n = 3), other parasite species ( n = 20), and apparently healthy subjects ( n = 24). Principal findings Obtained diagnostic sensitivities ranged from 53–88% for Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum , and from 68–100% for G. duodenalis . The R-Biopharm method achieved the best performance for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis/parvum both in terms of diagnostic sensitivity (87.5%) and detection limit (a 100-fold increase compared to other tests). The Fast Track method was particularly suited for the detection of G . duodenalis , achieving a 100% sensitivity and a detection limit at least 10-fold superior. Detection of E . histolytica was similarly achieved by all compared methods except Diagenode. Conclusions Diagnostic performance varied largely depending on the method used and the targeted pathogen species. Factors including test sensitivity/specificity, cost, patient population surveyed, laboratory workflow, and diagnostic algorithm should be carefully considered when choosing the most appropriate multiplex PCR platform.
Purpose To analyze the relationship between intraoperative cultures and the development of surgical site infection (SSI) in women undergoing laparotomy for gynecological surgery. Methods Prospective observational cohort study. Over a six-year period, women who underwent elective laparotomy at our hospital were included. Patients’ demographics, underlying co-morbidities, surgical variables, type and etiology of postoperative surgical site infections were collected. Skin and subcutaneous samples were taken just prior to skin closure and processed for microbiological analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses (logistic regression model) were conducted to explore the association of the studied variables with SSIs. Results 284 patients were included in our study, of which 20 (7%) developed surgical site infection, including 11 (55%) superficial and nine (45%) organ-space. At univariate analysis, length of surgery, colon resection, transfusion and positive intraoperative culture were associated with surgical site infection occurrence. Skin and subcutaneous cultures were positive in 25 (8.8%) and 20 (7%) patients, respectively. SSI occurred in 35% of women with positive subcutaneous culture and in 20% of those with positive skin cultures. Using multivariate analysis, the only independent factor associated with surgical site infection was a positive subcutaneous culture (OR 10.4; 95% CI 3.5–30.4; P<0.001). Conclusion Intraoperative subcutaneous cultures before skin closure may help early prediction of surgical site infection in open gynecological procedures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.