No abstract

The poverty issue was very complex regarding various aspects of life, therefore, poverty alleviation was needed an involvement of the various parties. In order to be able to cooperate with various parties was required a deep cooperation. This descriptive qualitative research aims to analyze the cooperation of various parties in the poverty alleviation. The data were collected through interviews with the Poverty Alleviation Coordination Team and the key informant. The results show that cooperation in the poverty alleviation was limited in coordination between work units of the regional apparatus. The coordination was undertaken in the context of programming, implementing, and evaluating of the poverty alleviation. However, the coordination has not been maximized due without involving the private sector and universities who were also members of the poverty alleviation coordination team. The cooperation was more optimal when applying the collaboration principles. Therefore, a deeper cooperation was needed than just coordination, that was, in the form of collaboration. The collaboration in the form of collaboration between various parties could be an innovative strategy in the poverty alleviation.

AbstrakResponsivitas adalah bentuk kepekaan dan kemampuan dari pemerintah dalam menyelenggarakan pelayanan. Termasuk dalam pemberian pelayanan pendidikan bagi anak berkebutuhan khusus. Bentuk pelayanan tersebut adalah penyelenggaraan pendidikan inklusif. Penelitian ini memberikan gambaran mengenai kepekaan dan kemampuan pemerintah dalam penyelenggaraan pendidikan inklusif dalam persepektif new public service, dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan analisis Straus dan Corbin. Kepekaan pemerintah dilihat melalui lima prinsip: (1) akses, hal ini diwujudkan dengan adanya sekolah yang menyelenggarakan pendidikan inklusif. (2) pilihan, Kepekaan pemerintah Kota Surakarta telah dibuktikan dengan memberikan pilihan-pilihan kepada ABK dalam bidang pendidikan. (3) informasi, Kurangnya komitmen dari komponen sekolah terhadap pendidikan inklusif mengakibatkan tidak semua sekolah terang-terangan menyatakan mereka sekolah penyelenggara pendidikan inklusif. (4) perbaikan, perbaikan selalu dilakukan dengan memberikan form evaluasi untuk tiap sekolah penyelenggara pendidikan inklusif. (5) keterwakilan, terlihat dengan adanya wawancara kepada orang tua siswa ketika akan masuk ke sekolah umum. Kepekaan perlu dihubungkan dengan perspektif new public service, agar menghasilkan pelayanan yang maksimal. Sedangkan kemampuan dilihat melalui keberhasilan pemerintah dalam membuat regulasi mengenai penyelenggaraan pendidikan inklusif. Responsivitas pemerintah dalam penyelenggaraan pendidikan inklusif telah dibuktikan dengan adanya pearaturan daerah tentang perlindungan anak dan keputusan kepala dinas tentang penetapan sekolah penyelenggara pendidikan inklusif. AbstractResponsiveness is a sensitivity and capability from the side of government to deliver governmental service, including the delivery of education service for children with specific necessities. This form of service is the implementation of inclusive education. This research illustrates about the sensitivity and capability government for the implementation of inclusive education based on New Public Service perspective. Qualitative and analytical approaches of Strauss and Corbin are used. Governmental sensitivity is counted from five principles such as (1) access, children with specific necessities are given wider access to any schools with inclusive education.(2) choice, The sensitivity of the government of Surakarta City has been proved by giving choices to ABK in selecting education . (3) information, not all school components have the expected commitment to inclusive education, and therefore, not all schools have taken account seriously the importance of inclusive education. (4) redress, redressing measures by giving evaluation form to each inclusive education provider schools. (5) representation, representation is also considered by interviewing parents when they take their children to enroll into public schools. Sensitivity must correspond with New Public Service perspective to produce maximum service. The capability is acknowledged through governmental success in making the regula...

This study analyzes the relationship between the decentralization policy in East Kalimantan Province and coal mining, using a literature study. The finding shows evidence that there is a mixed impact between the decentralization and mineral and mining sectors. The decentralization policy has provided opportunities for local governments to manage and utilize their natural resources independently. Decentralization in the mining sector brings positive impacts on economic security, as indicated by an increase in the East Kalimantan provinces human development index as of 2016 reaching 74.59. Decentralization would therefore be good for economic growth and poor for basic services such as education and health and the occurrence of landscape changes that lead to environmental damage.

This study aims to analyze and describe collaborative governance from public administration, where the dynamics of collaborative governance have involved multi-stakeholders in the policymaking process for the public interest. Collaborative governance has become an important publicity concept for academics. It is designed to respond to implementation failures, high costs, and the politicization of public sector regulations. This study used a systematic literature review technic in the field of public administration in order to obtain concepts relevant to the study of collaborative governance. Data collection techniques by searching from various sources and the latest literature, both from government documents and reports from print and electronic mass media, journals, and books related to public administration and government cooperation. The results showed that the complexity of the relationship between actors in public policy gave birth to a new concept called Collaborative Governance. In short, collaborative governance is a process and structure that involves multiple parties across organizational boundaries. Collaboration describes formal, active, explicit, and collectively oriented public management and policy cooperation. Its basic values are consensus orientation in decision making (goals), collective leadership in institutions (structure), multi-way communication in human relations (interaction), and sharing of resources in action (process). These basic values become a unified whole at every stage of public policy.