No abstract

Argues that the unique history of alcohol use in the US has led to the ascendance of disease theory as the dominant conception of alcoholism. Social-scientific research has consistently conflicted with disease theory, but psychological and other nondisease conceptions of alcoholism are not well-represented in the public consciousness, in treatment programs, or in policies for affecting nationwide drinking practices. Conflict in the field has intensified in the last decade, most notably surrounding the issue of controlled drinking in alcoholism treatment. It is suggested that the current cultural attitude toward alcoholism in the US, one strongly influenced by disease notions, has not led to an improvement in society's drinking problems and that there continues to be a need for psychologists to present alternative views of alcoholism. The concepts of dependence and addiction as related to alcohol and to drugs are discussed. (3 p ref)

Contemporary theories of addiction of all stripes rule out faulty values as a cause of addiction. Yet evidence from cross-cultural, ethnic, and social-class research, laboratory study of addictive behavior, and natural history and field investigations of addiction indicate the importance of value orientations in the development and expression of addictive behaviors, including drug and alcohol addiction, smoking, and compulsive eating. Furthermore, the rejection of moral considerations in addiction deprives us of our most powerful weapons against addiction and contributes to our current addiction binge. The disease myth of addiction in particular attacks the assumption of essential moral responsibility for people's drug use and related behavior, an assumption that we instead ought to be encouraging.

No abstract

No abstract