Objective: To measure free and total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] immediately before embryo transfer and analyze its association with early pregnancy outcome parameters such as biochemical pregnancy, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rates in women undergoing fresh embryo transfer after their first ovarian hyperstimulation. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Academically affiliated private fertility center. Patient(s): A total of 2,569 women undergoing fresh embryo transfer after ovarian hyperstimulation. Interventions(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): The study end points were biochemical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, early miscarriages, and ongoing pregnancy rate. Free and total 25(OH)D concentrations were measured 1 day before embryo transfer. Result(s): Total 25(OH)D correlated with free 25(OH)D. Total and free 25(OH)D serum concentrations were similar in those patients reaching and not reaching the study outcomes (biochemical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, early miscarriages, and ongoing pregnancy rate). There was likewise no statistical difference when analyzing the frequency of all study outcomes in quintiles of either total or free 25(OH)D. In addition, the study population was divided into three groups according to the total vitamin D status based on clinical practice guideline. All outcomes were similar in women with adequate, insufficient, and deficient total 25(OH)D. Multiple linear regression analysis considering confounding likewise indicated no association of free or total vitamin D with any of the study outcomes. Conclusion(s):Neither free nor total 25(OH)D concentration at embryo transfer was associated with successful embryo implantation in women undergoing fresh transfer after ovarian hyperstimulation. (Fertil Steril Ò 2021;115:655-64. Ó2020 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.) El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.
Background/Aims: Paternal exposure to adverse environmental conditions can act on offspring’s phenotype and influence offspring’s later life disease risk. Our study was designed to examine the effect of feeding male rats before mating a high-fat, high-sucrose and high-salt diet (HFSSD) over two generations (F0 and F1) on their offspring’s (F2) liver function and gut microbiome composition. Methods: Male F0 rats and male F1 rats were fed either control diet or HFSSD before mating. Liver function of F2 offspring was investigated, and their gut microbiome composition was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the F2 offspring of rats whose fathers and grandfathers were fed with control diet (CD) (F0CD+F1CD-F2 group) or HFSSD prior to mating (F0HD+F1HD-F2 group). Results: F2 offspring had higher serum aspartate aminotransferase activity (female, p < 0.05 and male, p < 0.01 respectively) compared with control. Shannon indexes of gut microbiota indicated a significantly higher diversity in the female F0HD+F1HD-F2 as compared to F0CD+F1CD-F2 female offspring (p < 0.01). The dominant phyla of all the groups were Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. There were significant differences in gut bacterial community composition at phyla and genus level between the F0CD+F1CD-F2 and F0HD+F1HD-F2. Furthermore, the variation in the relative abundance (percentage) of bacterial genus in the F2 offspring was associated with liver function alterations induced by a paternal pre-conceptional unhealthy diet. Male F0HD+F1HD-F2 offspring had higher serum cholesterol, high density lipoproteins as well as low density lipoproteins concentrations compared to the corresponding male control rats. Conclusion: Taken together, our findings suggested that a paternal pre-conceptional unhealthy diet predisposes the offspring to mild liver function alterations and alterations of gut microbiota in later life. Effects on lipids were sex-specific and only seen in male offspring.
In vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) is associated with an increased risk of preterm (33rd–37th gestational week) and early preterm birth (20th–32nd gestational week). The underlying general and procedure related risk factors are not well understood so far. 4328 infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI were entered into this study. The study population was divided into three groups: (a) early preterm birth group (n = 66), (b) preterm birth group (n = 675) and (c) full-term birth group (n = 3653). Odds for preterm birth were calculated by stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis. We identified seven independent risk factors for preterm birth and four independent risk factors for early preterm birth. Older (> 39) or younger (< 25) maternal age (OR: 1.504, 95% CI 1.108–2.042, P = 0.009; OR: 2.125, 95% CI 1.049–4.304, P = 0.036, respectively), multiple pregnancy (OR: 9.780, 95% CI 8.014–11.935, P < 0.001; OR: 8.588, 95% CI 4.866–15.157, P < 0.001, respectively), placenta previa (OR: 14.954, 95% CI 8.053–27.767, P < 0.001; OR: 16.479, 95% CI 4.381–61.976, P < 0.001, respectively), and embryo reduction (OR: 3.547, 95% CI 1.736–7.249, P = 0.001; OR: 7.145, 95% CI 1.990–25.663, P = 0.003, respectively) were associated with preterm birth and early preterm birth, whereas gestational hypertension (OR: 2.494, 95% CI 1.770–3.514, P < 0.001), elevated triglycerides (OR: 1.120, 95% CI 1.011–1.240, P = 0.030) and shorter activated partial thromboplastin time (OR: 0.967, 95% CI 0.949–0.985, P < 0.001) were associated only with preterm birth. In conclusion, preterm and early preterm birth risk factors in patients undergoing assisted IVF/ICSI are in general similar to those in natural pregnancy. The lack of some associations in the early preterm group was most likely due to the lower number of early preterm birth cases. Only embryo reduction represents an IVF/ICSI specific risk factor.
Background The risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is higher in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment than in women conceiving spontaneously. Objectives To determine whether the GDM risk after day-3 embryo transfer differs from the GDM risk after day-5 blastocyst transfer. Methods Prospective observational study in women becoming pregnant after first fresh embryo or blastocyst transfer. Results A total of 1579 women got pregnant and had live birth; 1300 women got day-3 embryo transfer only, whereas 279 women received at least 1 blastocyst. Of 1579 women, 252 developed GDM. Age, body mass index, baseline estradiol, baseline high-density lipoprotein, and progesterone on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection were not different in women receiving day-3 embryos only vs women receiving at least 1 blastocyst. The number and quality of retrieved oocytes were not different in women receiving day-3 embryo transfer from those receiving blastocysts. Our study confirmed already established GDM risk factors such as age and body mass index, baseline estradiol, and high-density lipoprotein, as well as progesterone after ovarian stimulation. We furthermore demonstrate that the GDM incidence in women receiving day-5 blastocyst transfer was significantly higher than those who received day-3 embryo transfer (21.15% vs 14.85%; P = 0.009). Considering confounding factors, we likewise saw that blastocyst transfer was an independent procedure-related GDM risk factor [P = 0.009, Exp (B): 1.56, 95% CI: 1.12-2.18]. Conclusion Blastocyst transfer after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection increases the risk of developing GDM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.