BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the tumor accumulation and heterogeneity of 111In-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin®) and tumor accumulation of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) and compare them to the tumor response in B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients receiving 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin®) therapy.MethodsSixteen patients with histologically confirmed non-Hodgkin’s B-cell lymphoma who underwent 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan therapy along with 111In-ibritumomab tiuxetan single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT)/CT and FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT were enrolled in this retrospective study. On pretherapeutic FDG PET/CT images, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was measured. On SPECT/CT images, a percentage of the injected dose per gram (%ID/g) and SUVmax of 111In-ibritumomab tiuxetan were measured at 48 h after its administration. The skewness and kurtosis of the voxel distribution were calculated to evaluate the intratumoral heterogeneity of tumor accumulation. As another intratumoral heterogeneity index, cumulative SUV-volume histograms describing the percentage of the total tumor volume above the percentage thresholds of pretherapeutic FDG and 111In-ibritumomab tiuxetan SUVmax (area under the curve of the cumulative SUV histograms (AUC-CSH)) were calculated. All lesions (n = 42) were classified into responders and non-responders lesion-by-lesion on pre- and post-therapeutic CT images.ResultsA positive correlation was observed between the FDG SUVmax and accumulation of 111In-ibritumomab tiuxetan in lesions. A significant difference in pretherapeutic FDG SUVmax was observed between responders and non-responders, while no significant difference in 111In-ibritumomab tiuxetan SUVmax was observed between the two groups. In contrast, voxel distribution of FDG demonstrated no significant differences in the three heterogeneity indices between responders and non-responders, while 111In-ibritumomab tiuxetan demonstrated skewness of 0.58 ± 0.16 and 0.73 ± 0.24 (p < 0.05), kurtosis of 2.39 ± 0.32 and 2.78 ± 0.53 (p < 0.02), and AUC-CSH of 0.37 ± 0.04 and 0.34 ± 0.05 (p < 0.05) for responders and non-responders.ConclusionsPretherapeutic FDG accumulation was predictive of the tumor response in 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan therapy. The heterogeneity of the intratumoral distribution rather than the absolute level of 111In-ibritumomab tiuxetan was correlated with the tumor response.

The norcholesterol uptake rate was reliable for characterization of adenomas among adrenal masses of >or=2.0 cm. CT attenuation value and MR suppression index were well correlated with each other, and were useful regardless of mass size.

No abstract

• Cube is a single-slab 3D FSE imaging sequence. • We applied a black-blood (BB) imaging technique to T1W Cube. • At 1.5 T, contrast-enhanced T1W BB Cube was valuable for detecting brain lesions.

We aimed to examine the accuracy of tumor staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) by using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT). From January 2001 to December 2021, 202 patients underwent PET-CT, CT, and MRI for the initial staging of ICC in two institutions. Among them, 102 patients had undergone surgical treatment. Ninety patients who had a histopathological diagnosis of ICC were retrospectively reviewed. The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET-CT, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting tumors, satellite focus, vascular invasion, and lymph node metastases were analyzed. Ninety patients with histologically diagnosed ICC were included. PET-CT demonstrated no statistically significant advantage over CT and MR in the diagnosis of multiple tumors and macrovascular invasion, and bile duct invasion. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of PET-CT in lymph node metastases were 84%, 86%, 91%, 84%, and 86%, respectively. PET-CT revealed a significantly higher accuracy compared to CT or MRI (86%, 67%, and 76%, p < 0.01, respectively) in the diagnosis of regional lymph node metastases. The accuracy of tumor staging by PET-CT was higher than that by CT/MRI (PET-CT vs. CT vs. MRI: 68/90 vs. 47/90 vs. 51/90, p < 0.05). 18F-FDG PET-CT had sensitivity and specificity values for diagnosing satellite focus and vascular and bile duct invasion similar to those of CT or MRI; however, PET-CT showed higher accuracy in diagnosing regional lymph node metastases. 18F-FDG PET-CT exhibited higher tumor staging accuracy than that of CT/MRI. Thus, 18FDG PET-CT may support tumor staging in ICC.