To investigate respiratory symptoms, increased bronchial responsiveness, and signs of airway inflammation in elite swimmers, we examined 29 swimmers from the Finnish national team and 19 healthy control subjects (nonasthmatic, symptom‐free). They answered a questionnaire and were interviewed for respiratory symptoms. Lung volumes were measured and bronchial responsiveness assessed by a histamine challenge test. Induced sputum samples were also collected. Fourteen (48%) of the swimmers and three (16%) of the control subjects showed increased bronchial responsiveness (P<0.05). The sputum cell differential counts of eosinophils (mean 2.7% vs 0.2%) and neutrophils (54.7% V5 29.9%) from swimmers were significantly higher than those from controls (P<0.01). Eosinophilia (sputum differential eosinophil count of >4%) was observed in six (21%) of the swimmers and in none of the controls (P<0.05). Symptomatic swimmers had significantly more sputum eosinophils than did the symptom‐free. The concentrations of sputum eosinophil peroxidase (EPO) and human neutrophil lipocalin (HNL) were significantly higher in swimmers than control subjects (P<0.001 and P=0.05). We conclude that elite swimmers had significantly more often increased tjronchial responsiveness than control subjects. Sputum from swimmers contained a higher percentage of eosinophils and neutrophils, and higher concentrations of EPO and HNL than sputum from controls. Long‐term and repeated exposure to chlorine compounds in swimming pools during training and competition may contribute to the increased occurrence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation in swimmers.

Sensitization to additional allergenic pollen components frequently occurs during prolonged birch RIT. However, the IgE levels are low and the clinical relevance is not known.

The hypothesis that eosinophilic airway inflammation is present in many patients presenting with respiratory symptoms suggestive of asthma but with normal lung function was tested. Thirty-six consecutive patients presenting with these features were studied. Twenty-five asthmatics and 43 healthy volunteers served as control groups. Signs of eosinophilic inflammation in blood and induced sputum were studied. Patients with respiratory symptoms were single-blindly treated with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), 800 microg daily, or placebo for 3 months, and re-examined at 3 months and 1 yr. Patients with respiratory symptoms had higher numbers of blood and sputum eosinophils than healthy persons (p<0.0001), but the degree of eosinophilic inflammation was less pronounced than in asthmatics (p<0.01). Three-month's treatment with BDP significantly reduced total symptom score (p<0.001), cough score (p<0.0001), and the number of blood eosinophils (p<0.01). For cough alone, the improvement was significant compared with placebo (p<0.05). The patients were followed-up for 1 yr, and 17 (55%) still had symptoms but retained normal lung function. Four (13%) patients had developed asthma and another 10 (32%) had become free of symptoms. Using lung function measurements and induced sputum analyses, a group of patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma and signs of eosinophilic airway inflammation but without enough airflow variability to be diagnosed as asthmatics were detected. They seemed to respond favourably to inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate treatment.

Background: Highly specific protein markers for eosinophils and neutrophils could be a valuable diagnostic aid in various respiratory disorders. The cell specificity of monoclonal antibodies against eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), human neutrophil lipocalin (HNL), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) was investigated using immunocytochemical techniques. Methods: Induced sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from 14 patients with respiratory conditions and four healthy individuals were studied. Antigens were detected at their intracellular sites in cells with well preserved structures using optimal techniques for fixation, permeabilisation, and immunolabelling. Results: Anti-EPO antibodies reacted only with eosinophils, and anti-HNL antibodies only with neutrophils. Anti-ECP antibodies reacted with both eosinophils and neutrophils and anti-MPO antibodies with neutrophils and monocytes. Cells not stained by monoclonal anti-EPO and anti-HNL antibodies included lymphocytes, monocytes, macrophages, squamous epithelial cells, and ciliated epithelial cells. Conclusions: EPO, a unique component of eosinophils, and HNL, a unique component of neutrophils, are useful markers for the identification of eosinophils and neutrophils, respectively, in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.

Induced sputum is increasingly used to detect and monitor airway inflammation in respiratory diseases. However, the processing of sputum has been rather laborious for clinical practice. The aim of this study was to improve the practicality of induced-sputum studies by simplifying sample processing. Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), neutrophil lipocalin (HNL) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) were used as biochemical markers of airway inflammation and the results of the study method were compared with a previously validated (reference) method. Induced sputum was obtained from 42 healthy controls, 10 subjects with acute respiratory infection, eight patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 17 asthmatics. The sputum sample was divided into two parts and treated either: (i) by the reference method (released markers), where sputum was homogenized with dithiotreitol and centrifuged to yield cell-free supernatant and a cell pellet, or (ii) by the study method (total markers), where the cells were lysed after homogenization so that cell-associated markers were released and solubilized. For comparison, the four biochemical markers were measured in sputum supernatant and in sputum lysate. The differential cell count was performed from the cell pellet in the reference method. Repeatability was assessed in a group of 16 subjects. The effect of reagents and the recovery of assays were also evaluated. Released and total markers correlated well (ECP r(s)=0.80, P<0.0001; EPO r(s)=0.49, P<0.0001; HNL r(s)=0.87, P<0.0001; MPO r(s)=0.71, P<0.0001). Incubation with dithiotreitol and lysis reagent had no negative influence on marker assays. The within-subject variability of total ECP, MPO and HNL in both methods was small in two measurements taken I week apart. The study method, measuring total inflammatory markers, gave comparable results to the reference method, measuring released markers. In the study method the sputum processing was simplified, which may improve its applicability.