Thirty‐four recurrent cases of 89 patients with ovarian cancer treated in our department between 1985 and 1989 were examined for changes in serum CA125 level.
Upon confirmation of recurrence, 17 patients were positive for CA125 and 15 were negative.
According to the histopathological type, the rate of CA125 positivity in patients with recurrence was high for serous adenocarcinoma, suggesting that determination of CA125 is useful for detection of recurrence. In contrast, all patients with mutinous adenocarcinoma or endometrioid adenocarcinoma were negative for CA125.
The CA125 positivity rate upon confirmation of recurrence was 9% in patients whose CA125 was less than 1,000 U/ml on initial examination, suggesting that close management of such patients is necessary.
Elevation of CA125 by 3 steps or more within the normal range (less than 35 U/ml) was useful for predicting recurrence.
The cut‐off level of CA125 during follow‐up should be set at 16 U/ml.
It was difficult to evaluate remission with only the serum CA125 level. It is impossible to avoid second look operation at present.
These results indicate that pretreatment values and changes of the parameter within the normal range (less than 35 U/ml) have to be considered when using CA125 as a marker of tumor recurrence.
We retrospectively reviewed 91 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent second-look operation (SLO). SLO identified a persistent tumor in 18 (19.8%) of 91 patients. Of these 18 patients, 13 (72.2%) showed disease progression after SLO. Patients with a positive SLO in which the identification of the persistent disease was only possible by washing cytological study showed better prognosis than patients with macroscopic lesions. Of the 73 patients with a negative SLO, 12 (16.4%) developed recurrence after cessation of treatment. These 12 patients were.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.