In this paper, we shall show that the following translation \(I^M\) from the propositional fragment \(\bf L_1\) of Leśniewski's ontology to modal logic \(\bf KTB\) is sound: for any formula \(\phi\) and \(\psi\) of \(\bf L_1\), it is defined as
(M1) \(I^M(\phi \vee \psi) = I^M(\phi) \vee I^M(\psi)\),
(M2) \(I^M(\neg \phi) = \neg I^M(\phi)\),
(M3) \(I^M(\epsilon ab) = \Diamond p_a \supset p_a . \wedge . \Box p_a \supset \Box p_b .\wedge . \Diamond p_b \supset p_a\),
where \(p_a\) and \(p_b\) are propositional variables corresponding to the name variables \(a\) and \(b\), respectively. We shall give some comments including some open problems and my conjectures.
In this paper, we shall show that the following translation I M from the propositional fragment L 1 of Leśniewski's ontology to modal logic KTB is sound: for any formula φ and ψ of L 1 , it is defined as (M1), where p a and p b are propositional variables corresponding to the name variables a and b, respectively. We shall give some comments including some open problems and my conjectures.
On March 8, 1995, was found the following nontrivial single axiomschema characteristic of Leśniewski-Ishimoto's propositional ontologyIn this paper, we shall present the progress about the above axiomschema from 1995 and conjectures about it. Here we shall give two criteria nontiriviality and quasi-nontriviality in order to distinguish two axiom-schemata.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.