A two-year study was carried out at Mallawi Agricultural Experiments and Research Station, A.R.C., El-Minia governorate, Egypt, during 2014 and 2015 seasons to determine the compatible soybean cultivar with high maize plant density to achieve farmer's benefit under intercropping conditions. Alternating ridges (70 cm width) between maize and soybean were used as 1:3, 2:4, 2:2, 3:3 and 4:2, respectively, in addition to sole culture of both crops. Local maize cultivar T.W.C. 310 was grown in one plant per hill distanced at 30 cm under intercropping and sole cultures, meanwhile local soybean cultivars (Giza 22, Giza 82 and Giza 111) were drilled in both sides of the ridge (two plants/hill distanced at 15 cm) under intercropping and sole cultures. A split plot distribution in randomized complete block design with three replications was used. The results indicated that maize yield attributes were increased significantly by decreasing maize plant density from 67 to 25% of sole maize under intercropping conditions, meanwhile the converse was true for plant height and grain yield per ha. All the studied maize traits were not affected by soybean cultivars. Also, all the studied maize traits were not affected the interaction between intercropping patterns and soybean cultivars. Soybean yield and its attributes were increased significantly by decreasing maize plant density from 67 to 25% of sole maize under intercropping conditions except plant height. The late-maturing soybean cultivar Giza 22 recorded the highest values of intercepted light intensity within soybean canopy, number of pods per plant, seed index, seed yields per plant and per ha, meanwhile, the highest values of biological yield per ha, plant height and number of branches per plant were recorded for soybean cultivar Giza 111. Soybean cultivar Giza 22 gave the highest seed yield per plant compared to the other cultivars under all the intercropping patterns. Relative yield of soybean showed that the earlymaturing soybean cultivar Giza 82 is better adapted to low light intensity than the other cultivars. Land equivalent ratio and area time equivalent ratio values for intercrops were greater than 1.00 indicating less land requirements of intercropping patterns than sole maize. Growing four maize ridges alternating with two ridges of soybean cultivar Giza 82 achieved the highest net return compared to sole maize.
The present investigation was carried out at Giza Agricultural Experiments and Research Station, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza, Egypt during the two successive seasons 2016 and 2017. The objective of this investigation was to assess the effect of applied irrigation water, infestation with insects and infection with virus on cowpea and maize productivity, as well as farmer income under intercropping condition. The experiment included nine treatments which were the combinations between three applied irrigation water levels (80, 100 and 120% of the recommended applied irrigation water level of maize) and three cropping systems (intercropping cowpea with maize, sole cowpea and sole maize), in addition to recommended sole maize that grown on ridges 70 cm width and received 100% of applied irrigation water. The experimental design was a strip plot with three replications. Irrigation water treatments were randomly assigned to the vertical strips and cropping systems were allocated in the horizental strips. Data indicated that the highest applied irrigation water level (120% ETo) had higher water consumptive use than the others. The intercrops had higher water consumptive use than those of sole plantings. With respect to maize crop, increasing applied irrigation water from 80 to 120% ETo significantly increased infestation with aphids, jassids, Hawaiian beet webworm, cotton leafworm and whiteflies on maize leaves, as well as higher grain yield per ha and its attributes. Intercropped maize had higher infestation with aphids, jassids, cotton leafworm and whiteflies, as well as ear leaf area per plant than those of sole maize, meanwhile, the reverse was true for greater sugarcane borer. Intercropped maize plants that received the highest applied irrigation water (120% ETo) had higher infestation with aphids, jassids and cotton leaf worm on maize leaves than the other treatments, meanwhile higher ear leaf area per plant was recorded by application of the recommended applied irrigation water of maize (100% ETo). With respect to cowpea crop, increasing applied irrigation water from 80 to 120% ETo significantly increased infestation with aphids, jassids, leaf miner fly, Hawaiian beet webworm, cotton leafworm and whiteflies, as well as soybean mosaic virus (SMV) infection on cowpea leaves, beside higher plant height, number of branches per plant and forage yield per ha. Intercropped cowpea had lower infestation with aphids, jassids, leaf miner fly and Hawaiian beet webworm, as well as lower SMV infection and number of branches per plant and forage yield per ha than those of sole cowpea. Sole cowpea that received the recommended applied irrigation water of maize (100% ETo) had higher infestation with Hawaiian beet webworm, jassids and leaf miner fly on cowpea leaves than the other treatments, meanwhile, SMV infection was not by the interaction between applied irrigation water levels and cropping systems. Sole cowpea that received the highest applied irrigation water level (120% ETo) had a higher number of branches per ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.