SUMMARY Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) repress the expression of exogenous proviruses and endogenous retroviruses (ERVs). Here, we systematically dissected the cellular factors involved in provirus repression in embryonic carcinomas (ECs) and ESCs by a genome-wide siRNA screen. Histone chaperones (Chaf1a/b), sumoylation factors (Sumo2/Ube2i/Sae1/Uba2/Senp6), and chromatin modifiers (Trim28/Eset/At-f7ip) are key determinants that establish provirus silencing. RNA-seq analysis uncovered the roles of Chaf1a/b and sumoylation modifiers in the repression of ERVs. ChIP-seq analysis demonstrates direct recruitment of Chaf1a and Sumo2 to ERVs. Chaf1a reinforces transcriptional repression via its interaction with members of the NuRD complex (Kdm1a, Hdac1/2) and Eset, while Sumo2 orchestrates the provirus repressive function of the canonical Zfp809/Trim28/Eset machinery by sumoylation of Trim28. Our study reports a genome-wide atlas of functional nodes that mediate proviral silencing in ESCs and illuminates the comprehensive, interconnected, and multi-layered genetic and epigenetic mechanisms by which ESCs repress retroviruses within the genome.

Highlights d Human germline cell specification begins from a transitional pluripotent state d Human primordial germ cells are specified from lineageprimed progenitors d Lineage-primed TFAP2A progenitors have gastrulating and amnion cell identity d TFAP2C regulates SOX17 at the point of human primordial germ cell specification

A four objective optimization framework for preferential crystallization of D‐L threonine solution is presented. The objectives are maximization of average crystal size and productivity, and minimization of batch time and the coefficient of variation at the desired purity while respecting design and operating constraints. The cooling rate, enantiomeric excess of the preferred enantiomer, and the mass of seeds are used as the decision variables. The optimization problem is solved by using adaptation of the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm. The results obtained clearly distinguish different regimes of interest during preferential crystallization. The multi‐objective analysis presented in this study is generic and gives a simplified picture in terms of three zones of operations obtained because of relative importance of nucleation and growth. Such analysis is of great importance in providing better insight for design and decision making, and improving the performance of the preferential crystallization that is considered as a promising future alternative to chromatographic separation of enantiomers. © 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2009