Mangrove vegetation has an important role for its functions and benefits to the coastal area and the society which lives in it. The purpose of this research is to know the distribution and the changes of mangrove vegetation area located in Perancak Estuary area within 10 years, and to know the green-ness level and the environmental parameters of mangrove vegetation; salinity and substrate condition. To observe the distribution and the changes of mangrove vegetation area, supervised classification is used on SPOT satellite imagery in 2007 and 2017. The result shows that the expansion of mangrove vegetation area in Perancak Estuary is 18.7 hectares along with the increasing of the green-ness level. In addition, the environmental parameters which are the salinity and the substrate conditions are also observed, where the average salinity value is 31.54 ppt and the substrate conditions are good (not much waste).

This study describes the process of enculturation anti-corruption where its dynamic has change to PendahuluanStudi kasus ini tidak berprentensi melakukan eksaminasi yuridis atau mencari justifikasi, kecuali berfokus memaparkan pemersepsian hakim pengadilan tindak pidana korupsi (disingkat tipikor) terhadap proses enkulturasi pemberantasan korupsi yang praksisnya pada setting penyelesaian perkara Mumu berubah makna menjadi harus menghukum terdakwa (disingkat  Artikel ini merupakan hasil artikel hasil penelitian dengan sumber dana dari Fakultas Hukum UNSWAGATI Cirebon. © Mengikuti konvensi etika penelitian, nama orang dan tempat menggunakan nama samaran, kecuali yang telah dipublikasikan oleh media massa dan mendapat persetujuan dari pelaku/informan HMT). Dengan meminjam teori konstruksi realitas sosial dari Peter L. Berger, gejala perubahan makna oleh dan dalam aktivitas para penggiat antikorupsi itu akan dikonsepsikan sebagai legiti-misasi HMT.

Conflicts occur when people believe that they are different from others and conflict in religion is no different. Religious conflicts in Poso and conflicts between Sunnis and Shiites in East Java have the effects of conflict, including protracted social friction, which prevents the development of a cohesive community. This research uses a socio-legal approach, where the study of law combines the approach of legal and social sciences. Establishing a way to settle religious conflicts is done by drawing up a legal basis for a settlement that accommodates human rights and democracy, emphasizing horizontal relations between religious communities. The existence of a legal culture becomes a meeting point for religious views, namely, prioritizing human rights. So, in the future, resolving conflicts based on legal culture in a cosmopolitan society is recommended.

The relationship between humans and the environment has managed to evolve throughout history. This relationship can be seen in both how people interact with nature and in the environmental laws they pass. These two things demonstrate how humans rule the environment. The COVID-19 pandemic has become one of the catalysts for rethinking the human-nature relationship and the impact of human dominance on the environment. Ecofeminism has emerged as a viable theory for combating this dominance. The historical development of environmental law as well as ecofeminism studies on the significance of environmental law will be examined in this study. This research is historically and philosophically oriented normative and qualitative jurisprudential research. The findings show that environmental law has developed over time in three distinct periods: traditional, modern, and post-modern. Three laws have been used to address environmental issues throughout Indonesia's history of environmental law development. Despite government efforts to uphold the framework of environmental law based on the idea of anthropocentrism, there are global environmental problems. The study of Ecofeminism and the urgent need for environmental laws that emphasize balance and combat human dominance of the environment must be built upon after the COVID-19 Pandemic. According to Ecofeminism, every legislature must establish this human-environmental relationship in order to end human dominance that endangers the environment.

This non-doctrinal study analyzes the practice of ignoring the values of logical-factual justice and righteousness to eliminate corruption among the high-positioned state officials. The aim is to describe the establishment of criminal trials which are ambitious, which yet has counterproductive effects. There is not only injustice, but there is also the ignorance of the premise of material righteousness as the rational working character of criminal law. The primary data is in the form of interview to the perpetrators and the informants. The secondary data is in the form of case documents, which are analyzed qualitatively with the hermeneutic interpretation technique. Results of the study show that the ambitious elimination of corruption has the potentials to break the logics of criminal trials and restricts the ratio and conscience of law enforcers.