Study Objective Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent and triples vascular thromboembolic risk. Intermittent hypoxia (IH) during transient cessation of breathing in OSA impairs endothelial protection against complement. Complement activation stimulates the endothelial release of a pro-thrombotic von Willebrand factor (vWF). We investigated whether increased complement activity in OSA promotes the endothelial release of vWF and pro-inflammatory angiopoietin-2. We further investigated whether improving complement protection with statins reverses these changes. Methods Using endothelial cells (ECs) and blood collected from OSA patients (n = 109) and controls (n = 67), we assessed whether altered cellular localization of complement inhibitor CD59 in OSA modulates exocytosis of Weibel-Palade bodies (WPB), secretory granules that store vWF and angiopoietin-2. These interactions were also assessed in vitro in ECs exposed to normoxia or IH with or without recombinant complement C9 and with or without atorvastatin. Results Circulating levels of angiopoietin-2 were greater in OSA than controls and levels of vWF cleavage products correlated with OSA severity. In cultured ECs, IH enhanced complement-stimulated angiopoietin-2 and vWF release by reducing EC surface and increasing intracellular expression of complement inhibitor CD59. Intracellular CD59 co-localized with WPB in OSA. IH increased binding of intracellular CD59 to syntaxin-3, which dissociated syntaxin-3 from voltage-sensitive calcium channel Cav1.2, and activated WPB exocytosis in a calcium-dependent manner. Atorvastatin reversed IH-enhanced endothelial release of vWF and angiopoietin-2. Conclusions IH promotes the complement-mediated release of vWF and angiopoietin-2, which may contribute to pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory conditions in OSA. Statin reversed these effects, suggesting a potential approach to reduce cardiovascular risk in OSA.
Introduction: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation guidelines recommend people with CF perform daily airway clearance. This can be difficult for patients to complete, as some find it time consuming or uncomfortable. Data comparing airway clearance methods are limited. We surveyed patients and families to understand which methods are preferred and identify obstacles performing airway clearance. Methods: We designed a REDCap survey and enrolled participants in 2021. Respondents reported information on airway clearance usage, time commitment, and medication use. They rated airway clearance methods for effectiveness, comfort, time commitment, importance, and compatibility with other treatments. Analysis included descriptive statistics and clustering. Results: 60 respondents started and 52 completed the survey. The median patient age was 20 years. Respondents experienced a median of four airway clearance methods in their lifetime, including chest wall oscillation (vest, 92%), manual chest physical therapy (CPT, 88%), huff coughing (77%), and exercise (75%). Past 30-day use was highest for exercise (62%) and vest (57%). Time commitment was generally less than 2 hours daily. Of those eligible for CFTR modulators, 53% reported decreased time commitment to airway clearance after starting treatment. On a scale of 0-100, respondents rated CFTR modulators as their most important treatment (median 99.5), followed by exercise (88). Discussion: Patients and caregivers are familiar with several methods of airway clearance for CF. They report distinct strengths and limitations of each method. Exercise and vest are the most common methods of airway clearance. Use of CFTR modulators may reduce patient-reported time commitment to airway clearance.
Introduction. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation guidelines recommend people with CF perform daily airway clearance. This can be difficult for patients, as some find it time consuming or uncomfortable. Data comparing airway clearance methods are limited. We surveyed patients and their families to understand which methods are preferred and identify obstacles to performing airway clearance. Methods. We designed a REDCap survey and enrolled participants in 2021. Respondents reported information on airway clearance usage, time commitment, and medication use. They rated airway clearance methods for effectiveness, comfort, time commitment, importance, and compatibility with other treatments. The analysis included descriptive statistics and clustering. Results. 60 respondents started and 52 completed the survey. The median patient age was 20 years. Respondents experienced a median of four airway clearance methods in their lifetime, including chest wall oscillation (vest, 92%), manual chest physical therapy (CPT, 88%), forced expiration technique (huff or cough, 77%), and exercise (75%). Past 30-day use was highest for exercise (62%) and vest (57%). The time commitment was generally less than 2 hours daily. Of those eligible for CFTR modulators, 53% reported decreased time commitment to airway clearance after starting treatment. On a scale of 0–100, respondents rated CFTR modulators as their most important treatment (median 99.5), followed by exercise (88). Discussion. Patients and caregivers are familiar with several methods of airway clearance for CF. They report distinct strengths and limitations of each method. Exercise and vest are the most common methods of airway clearance. The use of CFTR modulators may reduce patient-reported time commitment to airway clearance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.