IntroductionRotator cuff tears are common diseases of the upper extremity. There are no recommendations to the surgeon on how to prepare the footprint to ensure optimal tendon-to-bone healing. However, biologic augmentation using stem cells and growth factors is considered to encourage the healing process of the tendon. The aim of the study was to investigate the biomechanical and histological outcome of different footprint preparations in rotator cuff repair.Material and methodsOne hundred and eighty-nine Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to either spongialization, radiofrequency ablation or an untreated control group. Rats were killed after 1 or 7 weeks for histological evaluation or after 7 weeks for biomechanical testing.ResultsHistological evaluation showed better tissue organization in the control and spongialization group compared to the radiofrequency ablation group. The highest collagen I to collagen III quotient was found in the control group, followed closely by the spongialization group. Measured quotients showed a decrease in the values after 1 week compared to the values after 7 weeks, except in the radiofrequency ablation group, where an increase was detected. A significant difference was found in the load to failure test comparing the radiofrequency ablation group to the spongialization group (p = 0.0409) and control group (p = 0.014), but not comparing the spongialization group to the control group (p = 0.2456).ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that spongialization of the footprint before attaching the torn supraspinatus tendon can lead to better structural properties and higher quality of tendon-to-bone restoration at the insertion area when compared with radiofrequency ablation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.