BackgroundGlycemic variability (GV) induces coronary microcirculatory disturbance and myocardial damage in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, in nondiabetic acute myocardial infarction patients, the relationship between GV and myocardial damage remains unclear. Patients and methodsWe investigated GV with a continuous glucose monitoring system in nondiabetic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with emergent percutaneous coronary intervention. GV was expressed as the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE). Myocardial damage was estimated by myocardial blush grade and ST-segment resolution (STRes). STRes was defined as complete (>70%), partial (30–70%), or none (<30%). ResultsConsecutive patients (n=73) were enrolled and classified into a lower or higher MAGE group on the basis of the median MAGE. The higher MAGE group showed lower levels of myocardial blush grade (2.41±0.76 vs. 1.72±0.85, P=0.001) and STRes (complete: 56.8 vs. 33.3%, P=0.044; partial: 32.4 vs. 36.1%, P=0.741; none: 10.8 vs. 30.6%, P=0.037). ConclusionGV was associated with myocardial damage after percutaneous coronary intervention in nondiabetic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.

No abstract

A 77-year-old Japanese woman presented with asymptomatic abdominal lymphadenopathy. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL2R) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels were elevated, and a pathological examination of lymph-node biopsies revealed non-caseating granulomas, which was consistent with sarcoidosis. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography did not show a clear accumulation in the mediastinal lymph-nodes or heart. Five months later, she presented with acute progressive heart failure that was refractory to conventional treatment. Her sIL2R and ACE levels decreased spontaneously over time, without steroid treatment. Autopsy findings revealed non-caseating granulomas. Cardiac sarcoidosis presenting as acute, progressive, treatment-refractory heart failure is rare. Steroid therapy after the resolution of inflammation did not affect the clinical outcome.

No abstract