Introduction Care home residents often have multiple, chronic conditions and are receiving complex treatment regimes, yet 30–50% of prescribed medicines are not taken as recommended [1]. Polypharmacy and medication errors are common. Evidence suggests that there is a linear increase in medication errors with the number of medications a patient is prescribed. This paper describes an approach to identity and address inappropriate polypharmacy and safety concerns in Buckinghamshire care homes. The workforce used was: primary care and care home pharmacists, technicians and geriatricians. Methods A successful business proposal enabled a new interdisciplinary model of care to be established. This was delivered in 2768 Buckinghamshire care home beds (63% of Bucks ICS bed capacity). The CCG pharmacists, GPs and pharmacy technicians reviewed medication for all residents followed by a medication and clinical review by a geriatrician for the most complex individuals. Other community specialist teams were included as part of a Multidisciplinary team as needed. Data on reviews, medicines stopped and safety were collected from 2013–2018. Results Overall 2134 medications were stopped for 1268 residents of 2102 reviewed, with 505 interventions to reduce falls risk. 942 safety issues were identified and resolved. Total savings on medicines optimisation, waste and non-elective admission prevented was £619,000. System wide safety included: community psychiatric nurse to support dementia diagnosis, specialist enteral feeding nurse reinstated and a new website to share and disseminate good practice standards. Conclusions Future direction of this work focuses on system wide improvements to promote multi-organisational interdisciplinary healthcare and social services professionals work in care homes. NHSE Pharmacy integrated funding has provided extra pharmacists and technicians to support the 37% of the care home beds not yet covered by March 2020. Reference 1. Horne R, Weinman J, Elliot R, et al. 2005, NHS National Coordinating Centre for service delivery and organisation report.

No abstract

Introduction Care home residents often have multiple, chronic conditions and are receiving complex treatment regimes. Polypharmacy and medication errors are common. The frequency and quality of medication reviews is variable with limited general practice (GP) capacity to carry out comprehensive reviews. The initiative used a care home pharmacist, technician, geriatrician and GPs to tackle these issues on an individual and care home level. The objective being to ensure the safe and effective use of medicines for all care home residents. NICE guideline [NG56] recommends reducing pharmacological treatment burden for adults with multimorbidity at risk of adverse drug events such as unplanned hospital admissions. A study by Dilles et al1 found adverse drug reactions in 60% of residents. Methods A new interdisciplinary model of care was delivered in a 120 bedded Buckinghamshire care home. Clinical Commissioning Group pharmacist, general practitioners and pharmacy technician reviewed medication for all residents. The most complex individuals were reviewed by the geriatrician and if needed by other multidisciplinary team members specialist. Results Overall 115 medications were stopped for 109 residents, with 31 interventions to reduce falls risk and 19 interventions on medication at high risk2 of causing admission. Total cost savings on medicines optimisation, medicines waste and non-elective admission prevented was £35,211. Residents’ care plans were updated to reflect best practice standards. Conclusions Future direction of this project focuses on system wide improvements to promote interdisciplinary healthcare professionals work in care homes. The success of this integrated model of care has enabled recurrent funding of pharmacist by the local county council and an additional 42 geriatrician sessions into Buckinghamshire care homes. References 1. Dilles T, Vander Stichele R, Van Bortel L, Elseviers M. Journal of American Medical Directors Association 2013; 14: 371–6. 2. Pirmohamed M, et al. Br Med J 2004; 329: 15–9 61.

Results 100% of the FY participants who responded to the post-project evaluation survey (n=4) either agreed, or strongly agreed, with the following:. I now have a greater understanding of how to complete a QIP. . The amount of supervision I received was appropriate.. I would recommend this model of learning to a colleague.Each QIP demonstrated a positive impact on patient care, and included all of the core elements necessary to meet QI curriculum requirements. Conclusion This work demonstrates how a blended approach can drive the development of QI skills to the point of expected competency, while also delivering successful QIPs that result in improved quality of patient care.