In the context of a theoretical framework and the literature review summarizing the empirical findings, the authors analyze Ukraine's location advantages and disadvantages visà-vis FDI and present the major macro and meso-economic trends in Poland's FDI flows to and stock in Ukraine. At the micro level, the paper presents the results of an analysis of a sample of 18 companies from the Warsaw Stock Exchange that have invested in Ukraine. One of the main findings reveals a discrepancy between the modest value of Polish FDI in Ukraine and the relatively large number of Polish firms' subsidiaries and affiliates operating in the country. Analysis of the sample of units controlled by Polish parent companies in Ukraine allows for reaching conclusions about their assets, FDI motives and modes, types of FDI undertaken, and sales results. The authors wrap up the paper by drawing both policy implications for Ukraine and Poland, and the managerial implications for Polish direct investors in Ukraine.
An assessment of the financial condition of local government units (LGUs) is usually carried out in a manner referring to traditional tools and methods based on financial analysis. However, it turns out that this approach is unreliable. There are known examples of LGUs, which, despite current reporting concerning their financial situation to the authorities controlling their financial economy, not only did not avoid financial problems (see Rewal, Dziwnów, Byczyna communes), but as a result of the improper management of public funds they were liquidated (e.g., Ostrowice commune). The finding presented above raises pertinent questions about the effectiveness of the current way of assessing the financial condition of local government units and on this basis arriving at conclusions and estimations relating to the possible consequences of the situation in local finance for the future of LGUs. Given the above, attempts to develop new solutions to assess the financial situation of LGUs are becoming more frequent. The aim of this article is to build a synthetic measure for the assessment of the financial condition of communes with regard to all basic statistics describing local government finances and making use of the TOPSIS methodology. The constructed measure does not focus on the estimation of individual financial measures but rather takes into account their interrelationships and interactions. It eliminates the problem of the lack of relationships between the analyzed result values, which may be responsible for the incorrect interpretation of the financial conditions of local government units. The value of the obtained measure allows for an objective assessment of the condition of LGUs finances, providing synthetic information concerning the multi-sectional assessment of the condition of local government finances.
Company bankruptcies are an inseparable element of market economy. We may observe the tendency to view bankruptcy as a problem of weak and usually small entities facing problems when trying to meet the challenge posed by strong competition. Big companies, however, also fall, and their bankruptcy cannot be predicted by even the most experienced analysts. The aim of the article is to examine the effectiveness of the bankruptcy prediction models in case of sudden bankruptcies, on the example of Gant Development S.A. The author attempts to classify the real estate developer’s bankruptcy as “staged” bankruptcy by performing an analysis of company activities in the period of 2010-2013. The study was conducted using Polish models of linear discriminant analysis, widely popular in the Polish literature as well as the models which reflect the branch specificity of the examined entity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.