Objective. Three sensitive, selective, and precise spectrophotometric methods based on manipulation of ratio spectra, have been developed and validated for the determination of diclofenac sodium and pantoprazole sodium. Materials and Methods. The first method is based on ratio spectra peak to peak measurement using the amplitudes at 251 and 318 nm; the second method involves the first derivative of the ratio spectra (Δλ = 4 nm) using the peak amplitudes at 326.0 nm for diclofenac sodium and 337.0 nm for pantoprazole sodium. The third is the method of mean centering of ratio spectra using the values at 318.0 nm for both the analytes. Results. All the three methods were linear over the concentration range of 2.0–24.0 μg/mL for diclofenac sodium and 2.0–20.0 μg/mL for pantoprazole sodium. The methods were validated according to the ICH guidelines and accuracy, precision, repeatability, and robustness are found to be within the acceptable limit. The results of single factor ANOVA analysis indicated that there is no significant difference among the developed methods. Conclusions. The developed methods provided simple resolution of this binary combination from laboratory mixtures and pharmaceutical preparations and can be conveniently adopted for routine quality control analysis.
A simple and efficient high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method was developed for chiral separation of rac-bupropion (BUP) and its active metabolite rac-hydroxybupropion (HBUP). Design of experiment (DoE)-based optimization was adopted instead of a conventional trial-and-error approach. The Box-Behnken design surface response model was used and the operating variables were optimized based on 17 trials design. The optimized method involved impregnation of chiral reagent, L(+)-tartaric acid, in the stationary phase with simultaneous addition in the mobile phase, which consisted of acetonitrile : methanol : dichloromethane : 0.50% L-tartaric acid (6.75:1.0:1.0:0.25, v/v/v/v). Under the optimized conditions, the resolution factor between the enantiomers of BUP and HBUP was 6.30 and 9.26, respectively. The limit of detection and limit of quantitation for (R)-BUP, (S)-BUP, (R,R)-HBUP, and (S,S)-HBUP were 9.23 and 30.78 ng spot , 10.32 and 34.40 ng spot , 12.19 and 40.65 ng spot , and 14.26 and 47.53 ng spot , respectively. The interaction of L-tartaric acid with analytes and their retention behavior was thermodynamically investigated using van't Hoff's plots. The developed method was validated as per the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines. Finally, the method was successfully applied to resolve and quantify the enantiomeric content from marketed tablets as well as spiked plasma samples.
A simple, rapid and sensitive ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC−MS/MS) method has been developed for the simultaneous determination of cilostazol and its pharmacologically active metabolite 3,4-dehydro cilostazol in human plasma using deuterated analogs as internal standards (ISs). Plasma samples were prepared using solid phase extraction and chromatographic separation was performed on UPLC BEH C18 (50 mm×2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) column. The method was established over a concentration range of 0.5–1000 ng/mL for cilostazol and 0.5–500 ng/mL for 3,4-dehydro cilostazol. Intra- and inter-batch precision (% CV) and accuracy for the analytes were found within 0.93–1.88 and 98.8–101.7% for cilostazol and 0.91–2.79 and 98.0–102.7% for the metabolite respectively. The assay recovery was within 95–97% for both the analytes and internal standards. The method was successfully applied to support a bioequivalence study of 100 mg cilostazol in 30 healthy subjects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.