Endothelin is a potent vasoconstrictor substance that also can exert proliferative, inflammatory, and fibrotic changes in blood vessels and other organs. It acts on tissues in a paracrine and autocrine fashion, with local production and regulation occurring in both endothelial and nonendothelial cells. Endothelin stimulation of ETA and ETB receptors results in different and often opposing effects, which under physiologic conditions, establishes a balance that contributes to the regulation of vascular tone and blood pressure. Dysregulation of the endothelin system can induce or mediate endothelial dysfunction and organ damage in systemic hypertension (HTN), effects which may be ameliorated by endothelin antagonists. Endothelin receptor antagonists are currently being used in the treatment of pulmonary HTN. Both selective and dual-acting endothelin receptor blockers can also reduce systemic blood pressure in animal models and in hypertensive patients. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of these agents are underway, and show potential as a new class of antihypertensives. Studies are also in progress with a single moiety dual angiotensin-endothelin A receptor antagonist, which is being evaluated in HTN. Issues that need to be addressed include the net contribution of endothelin in the pathophysiology of HTN, its interaction with other neurohormonal systems such as the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and the clinical demonstration of the effect of endothelin receptor antagonism on end-organ damage in hypertensive patients.

No abstract

Background: National registries have provided data on in-hospital outcomes for several cardiac procedures. The available data on in-hospital outcomes and its predictors after pericardiocentesis are mostly derived from single center studies.Furthermore, the outcomes after pericardiocentesis for iatrogenic pericardial effusion and the impact of procedural volume on in-hospital outcomes in the United States are largely unknown.Methods: We used national inpatient database files for the years 2009-2013 to estimate the inpatient outcomes after pericardiocentesis in all-comers and in the subgroups with iatrogenic effusion. We also studied the impact of hospital procedural volume, among other predictors, on inpatient mortality.Results: About 64,070 (95%CI 61 008-67 051) pericardiocentesis were performed in the United States during 2009-2013. Of these, 57.15% (56.02-58.26%) of the pericardiocentesis were in hemodynamically unstable patients. Percutaneous cardiac procedures were performed in 17.7% of patients (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 4.02%, electrophysiologic procedures 13.58%, and structural heart intervention (SHI) 0.76%). Overall inpatient mortality was 12.30% (95%CI 11.66-12.96%). Inpatient mortality after PCI, electrophysiologic procedures, SHI and cardiac surgery were 27.67% (95%CI 24-31.67%), 7.8% (95%CI 6.67-9.31%), 22.36% (95%CI 15.06-31.85%) and 18.97% (95%CI 15.84-22.57%), respectively. There was an inverse association between hospital procedural volume and inpatient mortality, with a mortality of 14.01% (12.84-15.26%) at the lowest and 10.82% (9.44-12.37%) at highest quartile hospitals by procedure volume (p trend = 0.001). Conclusion:The inpatient mortality after pericardiocentesis is high, particularly when associated with PCI and SHI. K E Y W O R D S iatrogenic effusion, inpatient mortality, pericardiocentesis 1 | BACKGROUND Pericardiocentesis, the percutaneous drainage of the pericardial sac, is a procedure performed in contemporary cardiovascular practice in both the elective and emergent setting. A timely pericardiocentesis can be lifesaving in tamponade; else, a pericardiocentesis is done for large effusions for diagnostic and therapeutic reasons. The current European Society of Cardiology guidelines gives pericardiocentesis a J Interv Cardiol. 2018;31:815-825.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/joic

Rab GTPases are essential for vesicular transport. Rab GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) binds to GDP-bound rabs, removes rabs from acceptor membranes and delivers rabs to donor membranes. We isolated lethal GDI mutations in Drosophila and analyzed their developmental phenotypes. To learn how these mutations affect GDI structure, the crystal structure of Drosophila GDI was determined by molecular replacement to a resolution of 3.0 A. Two hypomorphic, missense mutations are located in domain II of GDI at highly conserved positions, but not in previously identified sequence conserved regions. The mutant GDIs were tested for ability to extract rabs from membranes and showed wild-type levels of rab membrane extraction. The two missense alleles showed intragenic complementation, indicating that domain II of GDI may have two separable functions. This study indicates that GDI function is essential for development of a complex, multicellular organism and that puparium formation and pole cell formation are especially dependent on GDI function.

The presence of LISA at a follow up of 6-18 months after stent implantation is associated with a higher risk of late/very late ST and MI. Additional studies are required to establish a cause and effect, and inform the management strategy. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.