Background: As with endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, the same transluminal access can be expanded to introduce an endoscope through the gastrointestinal wall into the retroperitoneum and remove infected pancreatic necroses under direct visual control. This study reports the first large series with long-term follow-up. Methods: Data for all patients undergoing transluminal endoscopic removal of (peri)pancreatic necroses between 1999 and 2005 in six different centres were collected retrospectively, and the patients were followed up prospectively until 2008. The initial patient and treatment outcome data were recorded, as were long-term results. Results: Ninety-three patients (63 men, 30 women; mean age 57 years) underwent a mean of six interventions starting at a mean of 43 days after an attack of severe acute pancreatitis. After establishment of transluminal access to the necrotic cavity and subsequent endoscopic necrosectomy, initial clinical success was obtained in 80% of the patients, with a 26% complication and a 7.5% mortality rate at 30 days. After a mean follow-up period of 43 months, 84% of the initially successfully treated patients had sustained clinical improvement, with 10% receiving further endoscopic and 4% receiving surgical treatment for recurrent cavities; 16% suffered recurrent pancreatitis. Conclusions: Direct transluminal endoscopic removal of pancreatic necroses is associated with good long-term maintenance of the high initial efficacy; complications can occur, with an associated mortality of around 7.5%. Further studies are necessary in order to optimise endotherapy and define its role in relation to surgery in the clinical management of such patients.
The current state of ulcer treatment in Germany was analysed in a prospective multi-centre study. It was based on 1139 consecutive patients admitted to the participating hospitals because of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The source of the bleeding was identified by diagnostic endoscopy in 1075 patients (94%), from a gastric and/or duodenal ulcer in 546 of them (mean age 62 +/- 18 years). Using Forrest's classification, 4% of patients were in bleeding stage Ia, 17% in stage Ib, 16% stage IIa, 30% stage IIb and 33% stage III. An attempt to arrest bleeding through the endoscope was made in 233 patients (43%): more often with tissue-preserving substances (epinephrine +/- NaCl in 36%, fibrin glue +/- epinephrine in 24%) than with tissue-damaging procedures (epinephrine + polidocanol +/- NaCl in 26%, epinephrine + thermocoagulation in 7%). Primary haemostasis was achieved in 219 patients (94%). There was a total of 66 recurrences of bleeding (12%), but the rate was 18% after endoscopic haemostasis. 64 patients (12%) required operative intervention, including initial emergency operations. Severe complications (infections, organic failure) occurred in 82 patients (16%). 114 of the 546 patients were in the high risk group (older than 60 years; high amount of bleeding). Their bleeding recurrence and mortality rates (27 and 22%, respectively) were significantly higher (P < 0.01) than those of the total group. Overall mortality rate was 11% (58 patients). The mortality rate depended on the severity of initial bleeding (26% for Forrest group Ia). After recurrent bleeding the mortality rate was 34% with conservative and 33% with operative treatment. 7% of all deaths were the direct result of bleeding. The following factors prognostically closely correlated with mortality rate: age of patient (P < 0.01); haemoglobin < 8 g/dl on admission (P < 0.05); initial severity of bleeding (Forrest group I; P < 0.05); and recurrence of bleeding (P < 0.001).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.