Colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals have been exploited in several applications in which they serve as fluorophores, because of the tunability of the wavelength of the emitted light. [1][2][3] The possibility of exactly controlling the size of nanocrystals is of great importance in the development of these materials, as this will lead to nano-objects with well-defined and reproducible properties. Whereas this goal seems to be hard to achieve with large nanocrystals, it might be viable for clusters consisting of a few tens or hundreds of atoms, as in this size regime a handful of structures can have an exceptionally high stability and therefore would form preferentially over any other combination of atoms. This concept is already well-known for several metal clusters, as for some of them several "magic" structures exist that are formed by closed shells of atoms. [4][5][6][7] Cluster molecules that can be considered as the smallest building units of semiconductors have been investigated in the past.As an example several tetrahedral cluster molecules based on the general formula [z-(where E = S or Se; M = Zn or Cd; and R = alkyl or aryl) or similar were reported some years ago. [8,9] The series was formed only by clusters containing a well-defined number of atoms, and therefore, characterized by particularly stable structures; thus, these structures can also be termed "magic-size clusters" (MSCs). Different families of almost monodisperse CdS clusters of sizes down to 1.3 nm were reported by Vossmeyer et al., [10] whereas CdSe MSCs were observed later in the solution growth of colloidal nanocrystals [11] and the various cluster sizes found were explained as arising from the aggregation of smaller clusters. Soloviev et al. synthesized and crystallized a homologous series of CdSe cluster molecules [12,13] (very similar in structure to those reported earlier [8,9] ) that were capped by selenophenol ligands. Also in many high-temperature organometallic syntheses of colloidal CdSe nanocrystals, either the transient formation of ultrasmall, highly stable CdSe clusters was noticed, [14,15] or these clusters could be isolated using size-selective precipitation. [16,17] Recently, one type of CdSe MSC has been synthesized in a water-in-oil reverse-micelle system.[18]Here, we report a method for controlling the sequential growth in solution of CdSe MSCs of progressively larger sizes. Each of these types of clusters is characterized by a sharp optical-absorption feature at a well-defined energy. During the synthesis, the relative populations of the different families of MSCs varied, as smaller MSCs evolved into larger MSCs. We can model the time evolution of the concentration of the various magic sizes using a modification of a continuous-growth model, by taking into account the much higher stability of the various MSCs over nanocrystals of any intermediate size.For the synthesis of the CdSe MSCs reported here a mixture of dodecylamine and nonanoic acid was used to decompose cadmium oxide at 200°C under an inert atmosphere. Th...
It was the purpose of this investigation to determine the cytotoxic effects (ED50 concentrations) of 35 monomers or additives identified in commercial dental resin composites. Monolayers of permanent 3T3 cells and three primary human fibroblast types derived from oral tissues (gingiva, pulp, and periodontal ligament) were used as test systems. All substances were tested in concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 5.0 mM. In general, ED50 values varied from 0.06 to > 5 mM. Within the groups of co(monomers), initiators, and cointiators, severe (e.g., Bis-GMA, UDMA, DMBZ, and DMDTA) or moderate (HEMA, BEMA, CQ, DMPT, and DMAPE) cytotoxic effects could be evaluated. Within the group of reaction/decomposition products, only moderate or slight effects were found (ED50: 0.7 to > 5 mM). The inhibitor BHT, the contaminant TPSb, and the photostabilizer HMBP, however, were highly cytotoxic in all cell cultures. In addition, the ED50 values of DBPO and HMBP significantly varied (0.43-3.8 mM, respectively, and 0.44-3.07 mM) with the applied cell culture. Our comprehensive screening shows that for several of the highly cytotoxic composite components, less cytotoxic alternatives are available. Furthermore, there was no cell type identified which was consistently less or more sensitive to the toxic effects of the tested compounds than the others. Primary human periodontal ligament and pulp fibroblasts, however, were found to be more sensitive than 3T3 and gingival fibroblasts to alterations from most tested substances.
In previous studies, light-cured glass-ionomer cements have been shown to evoke cytotoxic reactions. It was the purpose of this investigation (a) to determine the nature of the ingredients released into an aqueous medium from 2 light-cured glass-ionomer cements (GICs) and 3 compomers; (b) to evaluate the cytotoxicity of these extracts; and (c) to correlate the extent of the cytotoxic effects with eluted substances. Specimens of 2 light-cured GICs and 3 compomers were prepared and extracted in distilled water or cell culture medium for 24 hrs (surface-liquid ratio 42.4 mm2/mL). The aqueous eluates were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The relative amounts of the components released from various products were compared by means of an internal caffeine standard [%CF]. For evaluation of cytotoxic effects, permanent 3T3 fibroblasts were incubated with medium extracts for 24 hrs. In addition, the ED50 concentration of the photoinitiator diphenyliodoniumchloride (DPICl) was determined. In all extracts, several water-elutable organic substances were found: (Co)monomers (especially HEMA and ethylene glycol compounds), additives (e.g., camphorquinone and diphenyliodoniumchloride), and decomposition products. The extracts of 3 products inhibited cell growth only moderately, whereas the light-cured GIC Vitrebond and the compomer Dyract Cem revealed severe cytotoxic effects. Vitrebond liberated the initiator DPICl, whereas Dyract Cem segregated a relatively high quantity [2966 %CF] of the comonomer TEGDMA in comparison with the other products. The present data show that TEGDMA and DPICl may be regarded as the prime causes for cytotoxic reactions evoked by the investigated light-cured glass-ionomer cements or compomers. Therefore, leaching of these substances should be minimized or prevented.
It was the aim of our study to investigate the composition and cytotoxicity of aqueous elutes from five dentin adhesives currently used in clinical practice: Solobond Plustrade mark, Solisttrade mark, Scotchbond Multipurposetrade mark, Syntac SCtrade mark, and Prime & Bondtrade mark 2.1. Water extracts were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and relative quantities of identified compounds were compared by means of an internal caffeine standard [%CF]. The in vitro cytotoxic effects of substances released into DMEM were determined using immortalized 3T3-fibroblast cultures. In addition, the cytotoxicity of ethylene glycol (EG), which was identified in the extracts of Syntac SC, was evaluated. All dentin adhesives tested released various chemical components, like comonomers (mainly ethylene glycol compounds), HEMA, and initiating substances (e.g., camphorquinone). Elutes of Solobond Plus, which contained very high amounts of TEGDMA, were extremely cytotoxic. Two bonding agents (Scotchbond Multi-purpose, Syntac SC), which released significant quantities of HEMA, induced severe cytotoxic effects. In contrast, extracts from Solist and Prime & Bond 2.1 had very small effects on cell proliferation; these elutes contained small amounts of released chemical compounds. EG, a product of HEMA hydrolysis, in concentrations ranging from 0.025-25 mM was not cytotoxic. In summary, these results provide evidence that all dentin adhesives tested in the present study release in aqueous media chemical compounds some of which (for example, TEGDMA and HEMA) are cytotoxic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.