PRL is a mitogenic hormone that shares many characteristics with growth factors. The recent demonstration that rat mammary tissue expresses PRL messenger RNA (mRNA) led us to hypothesize that PRL may act as an autocrine/paracrine growth factor in the mammary gland and may be a determinant in mammary carcinogenesis. To examine this, mammary tumors were induced in rats by injection of the carcinogen nitrosomethylurea (NMU). In vitro studies used a cell line derived from NMU-induced mammary tumors. Expression of PRL and PRL receptor was assessed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. The NMU-induced mammary tumors and the cell line express mRNA for both PRL and PRL receptor (the long and short isoforms); additional hybridizing polymerase chain reaction products were seen in the tumors, but not in lactating mammary tissue. Immunoreactive PRL was detected in the NMU-induced tumors. The effect of PRL on cell proliferation was assessed by culturing NMU cells with PRL antiserum. The PRL antiserum inhibited cell proliferation by up to 70% compared to the effect of normal rabbit serum or GH antiserum. In summary, we showed that NMU-induced mammary tumors express mRNA for PRL and PRL receptor. Addition of PRL antiserum to cultured NMU cells significantly inhibited their growth. We propose that PRL may be acting as a local growth factor that stimulates the proliferation of mammary tumors.

Ewing's sarcomas are highly aggressive round cell tumors of bone and soft tissues that afflict children and young adults. The majority of these tumors harbor the t(11;22) translocation and express the fusion protein EWS‐FLI. Modern molecular profiling experiments indicate that Ewing's tumors originate from mesenchymal precursors in young individuals. EWS‐FLI alters the morphology of mesenchymal cells and prevents lineage specification; however, the molecular mechanisms for differentiation arrest are unclear. We recently showed that EWS‐FLI binds Runx2, a master regulator of osteoblast differentiation. In this report, we demonstrate that FLI sequences within EWS‐FLI are responsible for interactions with Runx2. EWS‐FLI blocks the expression of osteoblastic genes in a multipotent progenitor cell line that requires Runx2 to integrate bone morphogenic protein (Bmp)2 signaling while increasing proliferation and altering cell morphology. These results demonstrate that EWS‐FLI blocks the ability of Runx2 to induce osteoblast specification of a mesenchymal progenitor cell. Disrupting interactions between Runx2 and EWS‐FLI1 may promote differentiation of the tumor cell. J. Cell. Biochem. 111: 933–943, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Previous work from this laboratory demonstrated that MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells grown in nude mice contained minimal hypoxia but that tamoxifen treatment of these tumors resulted in increased hypoxia (Evans S. et al., Cancer Research, 1997). These findings led to studies exploring the link between estrogen signaling and tumor oxygenation and determining the role of VEGF in this process. The stimulation of estrogen-dependent MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells in vitro with beta-estradiol resulted in a two-fold induction of VEGF mRNA and 1.3-2-fold increase in protein, similar to what was observed when these cells were exposed to 0. 1% oxygen. Furthermore, the two stimuli given together had an additive effect on (increasing) VEGF expression, suggesting that the combination of hypoxia and estrogen may be important in upregulating VEGF in some breast cancers. Estrogen-independent MCF-7-5C cells, developed by growing MCF-7 cells in long-term culture in estrogen-free media, were also studied. Using EF5, a fluorinated 2-nitroimidazole which localizes to hypoxic cells, MCF-7-5C tumors grown in nude mice were found to contain lower pO2 levels and more hypoxic regions than similarly grown MCF-7 tumors. We tested the hypothesis that this might be the result of defective expression of VEGF in MCF-7-5C cells in response to beta-estradiol and/or hypoxia. However, MCF-7-5C and MCF-7 cells showed a similar induction of VEGF in vitro in response to either beta-estradiol or hypoxia. Therefore, although these two cell lines grown as tumors have substantial differences in the presence and patterns of hypoxia, this could not be explained by a difference in VEGF induction.

No abstract