<p dir="ltr"><span id="docs-internal-guid-41f11696-7fff-db33-7f42-a6fcf5441a61"><span>A Compilation of islamic law “Kompilasi Hukum Islam”, which was ratified through Presidential Instruction (or now decree) No. 1 of 1991, is a modern codification of Islamic individual and family law that becomes the standard of judges' reference in resolving cases in religious courts. One of the critical parts of KHI is inheritance, which is the main focus of this paper. The article on inheritance in KHI is interesting for further review because it has a different legal provision to fiqh or qanun. Through the study of libraries with a philosophical approach, this paper intends to analyze the provisions that become a barrier to inheritance from the perspective of Maqāṣid al-Sharia. This study shows that the obstacles to obtaining inheritance for reasons of persecution and slander, as mentioned in article 173 KHI, are some barriers to one obtaining inheritance that are not discussed as a barrier to inheritance in the classic fiqh book of severe persecution and slander. Through literature research, it is understood that the decree of persecution and slander is a barrier to inheritance in line with the Maqāṣid al-Sharia, namely to protect the soul (hifz al-nafsi), then guard the property (hifz al-māl) and further maintain self-respect (hifz al-'Ird) Thus. However, severe persecution and slander are not listed in classical Islamic jurisprudence as a barrier to inheritance. With the study of Maqāṣid al-Sharia, these two things are very appropriate to be applied in the rule of inheritance law, especially in Indonesia, so that these two acts cause very much harm to the victim (heir).</span></span></p><div><span><br /></span></div><br /> <br />“Kompilasi Hukum Islam”, yang disahkan melalui Instruksi Presiden No. 1 Tahun 1991, merupakan kodifikasi modern hukum perseorangan dan keluarga Islam yang menjadi standar rujukan para hakim dalam menyelesaikan perkara di pengadilan agama. Salah satu bagian penting KHI adalah kewarisan, yang menjadi fokus utama dalam tulisan ini. Pasal tentang waris dalam KHI menarik dikaji lebih lanjut karena memiliki ketentuan hukum yang berbeda dengan fiqh atau qanun. Melalui studi pustaka dengan pendekatan filosofis, tulisan ini bermaksud menganalisis ketentuan yang menjadi penghalang warisan dari perspektif Maqāṣid al-Syarī’ah. Hasil studi ini menunjukkan bahwa halangan mendapatkan warisan karena alasan penganiayaan dan fitnah, sebagaimana yang disebutkan dalam pasal 173 KHI terdapat beberapa penghalang seseorang mendapatkan hak waris yang tidak dibahas sebagai penghalang kewarisan dalam kitab fiqh klasik yaitu penganiayaan berat dan fitnah. Melalui penelitian kepustakaan, dipahami bahwa ketetapan penganiayaan dan memfitnah sebagai penghalang kewarisan sejalan dengan Maqāṣid al-Syarī’ah yakni yakni untuk menjaga jiwa (hifẓal-nafsi), kemudian  menjaga harta (hifẓal-māl) dan selanjutnya menjaga kehormatan diri (hifẓ al-‘Irḍ) Maka, sekalipun penganiayaan berat dan fitnah tidak tercantum dalam fiqh klasik sebagai penghalang kewarisan, namun dengan kajian Maqāṣid Syarī’ah, kedua hal ini sangat pantas diterapkan dalam aturan hukum waris, khususnya di Indonesia. Hal ini disebabkan karena dua perbuatan ini menyebabkan sangat banyak mudarat kepada korban (pewaris).

This paper's main problem is how to harmonize Islamic economic law with local culture, namely in petatah-petitih Minangkabau. This research departs from the Minangkabau religious customary philosophy, “Adat Basandi Syarak, Syarak Basandi Kitabullah”. Customary law and Islamic law as laws that live amid the Minangkabau society. Petatah-petitih, as a classic Minangkabau literature originating from the ancestors of the Minangkabau people, contains values to guide people in their behavior. Using literature study or documentation with qualitative descriptive research method, the research results reveal various harmonies between the values and principles of Islamic economic law with the values contained in petatah-petitih Minangkabau. Thus, the existence of petatah-petitih Minangkabau can play a role in internalizing the values of Islamic economic law in Minangkabau society. Enabling petatah-petitih Minangkabau indirectly also brings to life the values of Islamic economic law in the Minangkabau society.

This paper aims at explaining the background of the persistence of Pulang ka Bako marriage in Lasi area and its correlation to family resilience. This research is field research. The Minangkabaunese still carry out the tradition of Pulang ka Bako marriage (marrying the daughter of father’s female sibling) in Minangkabau community, especially in Lasi area. This marriage is considered the ideal type of marriage in Minangkabau. The data sources were obtained from the result of interview with married couples, traditional leaders, and religious leaders. The collected data were then reduced, presented, and concluded. This result showed that the background of Pulang ka Bako marriage was the community’s understanding that this type of marriage can guarantee the development and maintenance of inheritance, kinship social relations, and preservation of traditions and customs. This tradition can build family resilience in the terms of economic and social, and it strengthens cultural resilience as well. From the perspective of maqashid al-sharia, Pulang ka Bako marriage does not only bring benefit to the individual but also to the family. Besides fulfilling the elements of hifzun nasl (preserving offspring), hifzul mal (managing assets), and hifzul 'irdh (maintaining honor), Pulang ka Bako also fulfills the elements of tahqiqul sakn wal mawaddah wa rahmah (realizing the sense of peace, love, and compassion) and tanzimul janibul mali (managing family finances). It can be concluded that Pulang ka Bako type of marriage has fulfilled the objectives of Islamic law and is capable of being one of the solutions to family resilience issues.

This article aims to examine the reasons for the views of Imam Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Ghazali inthe Kitab of Al-Mustaṣfa min 'Ilmi Ushul which classifies Istihsan into the Mauhum argument (the argument that is admired). Istihsan is one of the ijtihad methods disputed by the scholars, although in reality, all scholars use it practically. Basically, the scholars use Istihsan in lughawi (language), which is "to do something better". But in terms of the term (which usually applies), scholars differ due to differences in understanding and defining "Istihsan". The method used is a qualitative method with a library research approach, with the finding that follows the best here ‫)احسن(‬ is the best from the propositions that have been revealed by Allah, not the best according to the inclination of reason alone. Furthermore, the argument that emerges inexplicably cannot be known whether it is imaginary or really exists. So that argument must be real, by taking it from the argument of Sharia, so that it appears real when he justifies or blames. So then, it is better to cancel Istihsan.

No abstract