Este estudo teve como objetivo comparar as respostas cardiovasculares e de óxido nítrico (NO) à contração isométrica voluntária máxima (CIVM) com diferentes grupos musculares (leg press [LEP] e preensão manual isométrica [IHG]) de adolescentes com e sem síndrome de Down (SD). Alem de comparar a força IHG absoluta e relativa entre os grupos. Onze adolescentes com SD (14,1 ± 1,0 anos) e dez sem SD (13,7 ± 1,25 anos) realizaram duas sessões experimentais de exercícios LEP e IHG: 1) sessão de familiarização e 2) 3 tentativas x 5 segundos de contração na CIVM com 3- intervalo mínimo de descanso. A pressão arterial (PA), a frequência cardíaca (FC) e o NO foram coletados em repouso, imediatamente após a sessão de exercício e 10 minutos após o exercício. A dosagem de NO na saliva foi realizada pelo método colorimétrico de Griess. Não houve diferenças para respostas cardiovasculares e NO entre os grupos para CIVM. No entanto, o SD teve uma resposta cardiovascular menor, mas não significativamente, em repouso e após os testes de CIVM do que aqueles sem SD. O grupo SD apresentou maior concentração de NO em repouso, recuperação e após IHG quando comparado ao grupo não SD (P <0,05). Além disso, adolescentes com SD apresentaram menor nível de força de IHG absoluta e relativa quando comparados àqueles sem SD (P = 0,001). Indivíduos com SD apresentam menor resposta cardiovascular em repouso e após testes de CIVM e maior resposta de NO após o exercício quando comparados ao grupo sem SD.

Background This study was designed to compare the cardiovascular and nitric oxide (NO) responses to maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) with different muscle groups (leg press [LEP] and isometric handgrip [IHG] exercise) of adolescents with Down syndrome (DS) and age-matched non-DS peers. We also aimed to compare the absolute and relative IHG strength between groups. MethodsEleven adolescents with DS (14.1 ± 1.0 years) and ten without DS (13.7 ± 1.25 years)participants performed two experimental sessions of LEP and IHG exercises: 1) familiarization session and 2) 3 attempts x 5-sec contraction at MVIC with 3-min rest interval. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and NO were collected at rest, immediately post-exercise session, and 10-min post-exercise. Results There were no differences for cardiovascular and NO responses between groups for MVIC test using different muscle groups. However, DS group displayed a lower but not significantly cardiovascular response at rest and after MVIC tests than controls. Furthermore, DS group displayed a higher NO- concentration at rest, recovery and after IHG when compared to controls (P< 0.05). In addition, DS adolescents displayed a significantly lower level in absolute and relative IHG strength when compared to controls (P = 0.001). Conclusions Individuals with DS display a lower cardiovascular response at rest and after MVIC tests than controls and higher NO response after exercise.

Objective: To describe the profile of blood donors in a hospital in the Midwest of Brazil with its own blood bank to have a diagnostic view of the establishment and enable the planning of improvements in services. Methods: This is a descriptive, retrospective study with a quantitative approach. A proportional stratified sampling technique was used, with a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of 5%, to represent and characterize the study population, obtaining a sample of 363 donors. Subsequently, a proportional allocation was performed in the established groups (fit donors, unfit donors, and platelet apheresis donors). Results: The profile of eligible donors in the institution studied was composed of married (55.2%), male (63.7%), aged between 20 and 30 years (40.4%), with O RhD+ blood (46.7%) and A RhD+ (29.6%) more prevalent. Apheresis platelet donors (50%) are single, female (81.3%), and aged between 31 and 40 years (43.8%). As for unfit donors, 94.8% are temporary-unfit donors, married donors (53.2%), female (54.5%), and between 20 and 40 years old (54.6%), with the categories of health condition and lifestyle being the most prevalent reasons for disability. Conclusion: There is a hegemony for replacement and first-time donors, showing the effectiveness of the solidarity policy implemented in the institution, but it shows the low effectiveness in the loyalty of these donors.

No abstract