Based on field research at numerous campuses, this article unravels teaching practices and legal research at Indonesia's law schools. This article is not aimed to explain the debates on normative and empirical in legal research, but it explains why such debates had been vehemently becoming unresolved and as challenge in improving interdisciplinary approach. This article shows finding that vehement debates happen since both tradition legal research apply them seem like religious doctrine.

Disruption poses a threat on legal profession establishments such as law firms, notaries, as well as the courts. In the past, law used to be perceived as a complicated matter to laypersons and thus people dealing with the law required legal consultants in the past. However, artificial intelligence capable of resolving various legal issues has now become readily available making it unnecessary for people to consult with law firms. The main question is, why is artificial intelligence capable of replacing the human legal profession? In an effort to answer the said question, the research method looks at previous research predicting the occurrence of disruption in the area of law. The researcher also considers the most recent developments in the “competition” between the human legal profession and artificial intelligence. Any technology is bound to be replaced by an even more sophisticated technology, hence the legal profession applying a mechanical legal process is inevitably going to be replaced with speedier and more accurate artificial intelligence.  IntisariDisrupsi mengancam kemapanan profesi hukum seperti kantor-kantor advokat, notaris, dan juga pengadilan. Jika sebelumnya, hukum terasa rumit bagi banyak orang awam sehingga memerlukan konsultan hukum bagi yang berurusan dengan hukum, kini telah tersedia artificial intelligence yang mampu memecahkan berbagai persoalan hukum sehingga orang tidak perlu konsultasi ke kantor hukum. Pertanyaan mendasar, mengapa artificial inttelligence dapat menggantikan profesi hukum manusia? Untuk menjawab pertanyaan itu, Penulis menelusuri penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya yang memprediksi munculnya disrupsi di bidang hukum. Penulis juga melihat perkembangan terbaru “kompetisi” antara profesi hukum manusia dan artificial intelligence. Teknologi yang lebih canggih akan menggantikan sesuatu yang bersifat teknologi pula, maka profesi hukum yang cara berhukumnya mekanis akan digantikan oleh artificial intelligence yang lebih cepat dan akurat.

Parking area is a type of strategic business needed by the community. however, one obstacle that often arises is security disturbances such as loss of consumer goods in vehicles. It is not uncommon for parking land owners to be reluctant to take responsibility for this loss. The purpose of this study was to describe the legal relationship between parking managers and consumers and to analyze the responsibilities of parking managers in the event of loss of goods in the vehicle. This article is based on doctrinal law research with statutory regulations approach and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the legal relationship between the parking manager and the owner's consumer is an agreement for storing goods, not renting land. The legal consequence of the goods storage agreement in the parking agreement is to impose responsibility on the parking manager for the loss of the vehicle and the items in the vehicle.Keywords: parking area; agreement; legal responsibilityAbstrak Lahan parkir merupakan jenis usaha strategis yang dibutuhkan oleh masyarakat. namun, salah satu kendala yang sering muncul adalah gangguan keamanan seperti hilangnya barang konsumen di kendaraan. Tidak jarang pemilik lahan parkir enggan bertanggung jawab terhadap kehilangan tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan hubungan hukum pengelola parkir dengan konsumen dan menganalisis tanggung jawab pengelola parkir dalam hal terjadinya kehilangan barang di dalam kendaraan. Artikel ini berdasarkan penelitian hukum doctrinal dengan pendekaran peraturan perundang undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hubungan hukum antara pengelola parkir dengan konsumen pemilik adalah perjanjian penitipan barang, bukan sewa-menyewa lahan. Konsekuensi hukum dari perjanjian penitipan barang dalam perjanjian parkir adalah membebankan tanggung jawab kepada pengelola parkir terhadap kehilangan kendaraan beserta barang yang terdapat di dalam kendaraan.Kata Kunci : lahan parkir; perjanjian; tanggung jawab hukum.

ABSTRAKSengketa jual beli tanah dalam perkara ini menyeret pihak penjual yang telah menjual objek yang sama kepada dua pembeli dalam dua kali transaksi. Pembeli kedua (penggugat) melayangkan gugatannya terhadap pembeli pertama (tergugat II). Posisi hukumnya dilematis. Kedua pembeli sama-sama merasa mempunyai hak atas tanah sengketa karena telah membeli objek yang sama dari penjual. Untuk membuktikan siapa pembeli yang berhak, hakim perlu mempertimbangkan asas "iktikad baik" (good faith), sebagai dasar untuk menentukan pembeli yang patut mendapat perlindungan hukum. Permasalahannya, kedua pembeli sama-sama mengklaim dirinya adalah pembeli yang beriktikad baik. Sehingga, untuk menilai siapa pembeli yang patut mendapat perlindungan hukum, hakim berpegangan pada prinsip duty of care, dengan mempertimbangkan siapa pembeli yang berhati-hati dan cermat memeriksa data yuridis dan data fisik sebelum dan saat jual beli dilakukan. Prinsip duty of care ini bersifat abstrak, maka metode penulisan yang digunakan, menelusuri dan mengkaji pendapat para ahli hukum perdata dan agraria untuk didialogkan dengan putusan-putusan hakim. Perkembangan putusan-putusan pengadilan mengenai pembeli beriktikad baik yang mengadopsi prinsip duty of care, seharusnya menjadi 'pegangan' para hakim dalam menangani kasus yang serupa, untuk menilai kapan pembeli dikategorikan sebagai pembeli beriktikad baik.Kata kunci: iktikad baik, perlindungan hukum, duty of care, data yuridis dan fisik.ABSTRACTThe dispute of land sale and purchase in this case drag the seller who had sold the same object to two buyers in two transactions. The second buyer (plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against the first buyer (defendant II). Its legal standing created a dilemma. Both buyers felt equally entitled to be the owner of the disputed land, which is the same object purchased from the seller. In providing evidence of the most eligible buyer, the judge should take into consideration the principle of "good faith" as the basis for determining the buyer deserving legal protection. The problem is that both buyers claimed that they were buyers of good faith. Therefore, to appraise which buyer deserving the legal protection, the judges adhered to principle of "duty of care" by taking into account which one of them was carefully and meticulously reading-through the juridical and physical data prior to and during the sale and purchase of the land was conducted. Given the abstract nature of the principle of "duty of care" the analysis method used in this discussion is exploring and studying the opinions of the experts of civil and agrarian law as to be juxtaposed with the decisions of the judges. The development of court decisions related to the issue of good faith buyers adopting the principle of "duty of care" should serve as a reference for the judges in handling similar cases to determine a good faith buyer.Keywords: good faith, legal protection, duty of care, juridical and physical data.

This research aims to find out the authority and process and mechanism of land acquisition for private interests in terms of building the smelter facility of PT. Amman Mineral Nusa Tenggara (AMMAN) in the industrial area of Maluk Village, Maluk District, West Sumbawa Regency which is a National Strategic Project regulated in the Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2020 concerning the 2020-2024 National Medium Term Development Plan. In carrying out the development agenda (national priority) of the 2020-2024 RPJMN, Strategic Priority Projects (Major Projects) are prepared, namely 9 industrial areas outside Java and 31 smelters. In this regard, in terms of solving problems or answering problems, empirical normative types are used by using 3 approaches, namely the Conceptual Approach, the Statute Approach and the case approach by collecting data which includes data Primary and secondary data were studied and analyzed using qualitative-descriptive analysis. By using this method, the author is finally able to answer the existing problems, namely land acquisition for private interests in terms of the construction of PT. Amman Mineral Nusa Tenggara (AMMAN) based on Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Public Interest for the construction of a smelter is carried out through 4 stages, namely the planning stage, the preparation stage, then the implementation stage and the results delivery stage. As for the process of implementing compensation for land acquisition for the public interest, the construction of the smelter PT. AMNT starts from the stages of inventory and identification of land tenure, ownership, use and utilization. After the inventory was carried out, the implementing team then carried out an assessment of compensation for community land which included the area of land required in this land acquisition.