Describing the characteristics
of shale pore structure is vital
for the assessment of shale reservoir, which has significant influence
on the storage and seepage mechanisms of gas shale. To profoundly
understand the shale pore structure characteristics of continental
shale reservoir, fractal analysis was performed on 45 continental
shale samples from the Ordos Basin, NW China, via low-pressure N2 adsorption experiments. The characteristics of N2 adsorption isotherms revealed that slit-shaped shale pores are dominant
among the geometric shapes of shale pores. During N2 molecules
adsorption process, different characteristics were displayed at two
regions where relative pressures (P/P
0) were 0–0.45 and 0.45–1. The Frenkel–Halsey–Hill
(FHH) method was used to calculate fractal dimensions (D) at these two regions. In addition, the fractal exponents “(D – 3)/3” and “(D –
3)” were compared adequately. The results show creditable fractal
characteristics for continental shale. Fractal exponent D – 3 is more suitable for the calculation of the fractal dimension
in the study area. The surface fractal dimension (D
21) and pore structure fractal dimension (D
22) were further investigated. Results indicate that D
21, ranging from 2.04 to 2.50, was affected
by shale constituents and provided a site for gas shale adsorption. D
22 reflects the irregularity and heterogeneity
of the shale structure, varying from 2.20 to 2.65, and is higher overall
than D
21. Furthermore, the value of D
22 negatively correlates with the average diameter
of the shale. In addition, the comparisons of shale pore structure
characteristics between the reservoirs Chang-7 and Chang-9 show that
the shale pore structure of Chang-9 reservoir is more irregular and
nonhomogeneous and is favorable for gas shale storage but unfavorable
for seepage.
To characterize the pore structure and quantify fractal dimensions of tight gas sandstones, a case study is performed on the Lower-Middle Permian tight sandstones in the Ordos Basin in China by conducting a series of experiments including X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, routine petrophysical measurements, thin section and scanning electronic microscope (SEM) observations, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiment. The studied tight sandstones mainly consist of quartz and clay minerals, and pore types include primary intergranular pores, inter-and intragranular dissolution pores, as well as micropores associated with clay aggregates; T 2 spectra reflect three types of pore size distributions in the studied samples, indicating a rather irregular pore distribution pattern in tight sandstones; NMR can estimate porosity of tight sandstones accurately, and movable-fluid porosity from NMR can better reflect the permeability of tight sandstones than total porosity. Two fractal dimensions, D bnd (with respect to bound-fluid pores) and D mov (with respect to movable-fluid pores), are calculated to be 1.1135−1.8116 (average 1.4750) and 2.6816−2.9932 (average 2.8921), respectively. D bnd increases with the decrease of detrital quartz content and the increase of clay mineral content, whereas D mov increases with the increase in authigenic quartz content and the decrease of detrital quartz content; fractal dimensions can reflect the physical properties of tight sandstones, as large D bnd and D mov values typically result in low movable-fluid porosity and permeability; the pore network of tight sandstones can be considered as a dual-scale pore system based on fractal theory, whereas D bnd and D mov can reveal the roughness of bound-fluid pore surface and the distribution of movable-fluid pores, respectively. This study shows that NMR fractal dimension can be employed as an effective indicator to characterize the pore network of tight sandstones.
A series of experiments
including porosity and permeability measurements,
thin section and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations,
incremental pressure mercury injection (IPMI), and nuclear magnetic
resonance (NMR) were conducted to systematically characterize the
pore structure of tight sandstone from the Lower Shihezi Formation
of Permian (P2x) in the northeastern Ordos Basin, China.
The influences of pore types, pore size distribution, and fractal
characteristics on reservoir quality of tight sandstones are also
investigated. Results show that the studied tight sandstones generally
possess poor quality and complex pore structure. The porosity and
permeability range from 4.08% to 17.56% (average 9.22%) and from 0.05
to 16.66 mD (average 2.49 mD), respectively. Five pore types were
observed in thin section and SEM images: primary intergranular pores,
intergranular dissolution pores, intragranular dissolution pores,
micropores within clay aggregates, and microfractures. The pore throats
are mainly hairy/fibrous, inhibiting the connectivity between pores.
Three types of pore structures were identified in the mercury-injection
curves and pore size distribution curves from the IPMI experiment
and in the T
2 relaxation time spectrum
obtained by NMR. Both experiments yielded consistent classifications,
and their combination was necessary to analyze the pore structure
effectively. In general, permeability and porosity are positively
related and depend on pore types. Large numbers of small pores confer
high storage capacity, whereas small numbers of larger pores improve
the flow capability. In the high porosity–permeability zone,
larger pores also determine the storage capacity. The P2x tight sandstone is fractal, and macropores are more heterogeneous
while micropores are more homogeneous. The fractal dimensions of macropores
are good indicators of the reservoir quality of the P2x
tight sandstone as larger fractal dimension values of macropores reflect
poor reservoir quality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.