Although the pathogenesis of BPH is not yet fully understood and several mechanisms seem to be involved in the development and progression, recent studies strongly suggest that BPH is an immune inflammatory disease. The T-cell activity and associated autoimmune reaction seem to induce epithelial and stromal cell proliferation. Further understanding of the role of inflammation in BPH and clinical detection of this inflammation will expand the understanding of BPH pathogenesis and its histologic and clinical progression, allow risk stratification for patients presenting with BPH-related LUTS, and suggest novel treatment strategies.
The aim of this study was to analyze the pre- and intraoperative risk factors that affect the development of postoperative systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Medical records on 317 adult patients with the complete data who underwent single-stage PCNL and followed at our center were retrospectively studied. Patients' data were collected through a database which was collected prospectively. All patients' vital signs were recorded hourly in the postoperative period and were divided into two groups as patients developing SIRS and not developing SIRS. There were 202 men and 115 women with a mean age of 48 ± 13.7 (range 19-82) years. There were 53 (16.7 %) in the SIRS and 264 (83.3 %) patients in the non-SIRS group. Preoperative positive urine cultures (UCs), intraoperative positive renal pelvic urine cultures (RPUCs), and stone cultures (SCs) were strongly correlated with the development of SIRS (p = 0.001). In the SIRS developers' group, preoperative UCs, intraoperative RPUCs, and SCs were positive in 33.9, 22.5, and 28.6 % of patients, respectively, but only 9.8, 3.3, and 4.2 % for the corresponding specimens in non-SIRS group. Positive preoperative UCs, intraoperative RPUCs, and SCs are important factors indicating the development of postoperative SIRS. Appropriately treated preoperative urinary infections may not prevent infected urine at PCNL. RPUCs and SCs may be the only way to identify the causative organism and direct antimicrobial therapy, so we recommend collecting RPUCs and SCs routinely to identify the offending organism and guide treatment.
Forgotten ureteral stents represent a difficult problem for urologists; the major complications are infection, migration, encrustation, stone formation, and multifractured stent, and a consensus on the best therapeutic approach is lacking. Here we present our experience with endoscopic management of this challenging problem and discuss the various endourological approaches for treating forgotten encrusted ureteral stents. From January 2005 to December 2010, 19 patients (11 women and 8 men) with encrusted ureteral stents were retrospectively analyzed. Combined endourologic therapies including extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (URSL), and cystolithotripsy (CLT) were used to achieve stent removal. A total of 19 patients with encrusted ureteral stents were treated at our center. The mean patient age was 46.2 ± 18.5 years (8-81), the average indwelling time of the stent was 24.7 ± 19.0 months (8-93), and the mean hospital stay was 3.4 ± 4.0 days (range 1-15 days). Using the described combination of techniques, all stents and the associated stones were eventually removed without any complications and patients were rendered stone- and stent-free. A main element of the treatment strategy was to keep the number of interventions as low as possible. The use of various combinations of endourological techniques can achieve effective stent and stone treatment after a single anesthesia session with minimal morbidity and short hospital stay.
Urology has moved to an era in which costs and quality of care are being scrutinized, and compliance to CPGs will be assessed. Practicing urologists do not have the time to keep up to date with the continuous incoming literature and CPGs are a great tool to give the highest quality of care to our patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.