IMPORTANCEThe role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has not been well defined in resected pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of PORT using modern techniques on survival and safety in patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The PORT-C randomized clinical trial was conducted in 394 patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC treated with complete resection and 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2009 and December 2017. Data were analyzed between March 2019 and December 2020. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized equally into the PORT arm (n = 202) or the observation arm (n = 192). The total dose of PORT was 50 Gy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival, and toxic effects.RESULTS In total, 394 patients were enrolled and 364 were eligible, with a median (range) age of 55 (25-70) years. There were 202 (55.5%) male and 162 (44.5%) female patients. The median follow-up was 46.0 (95% CI, 41.9-51.4) months, and 230 DFS events were reported. There were 184 patients in the PORT arm and 180 patients in the observation arm. The 3-year DFS rates were 40.5% with PORT vs 32.7% with observation (median, 22.1 vs 18.6 months), and the difference in DFS was not statistically significant without adjustment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.09; P = .20), though it was significant with preplanned yet exploratory analysis (stratified analysis by the number of detected lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes, HR, 0.75; log-rank P = .04). The 3-year OS rates were 78.3% vs 82.8% (HR, 1.02; P = .93), and LRFS was 66.5% vs 59.7% (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97; P = .03), respectively. For 310 per-protocol patients (140 with PORT and 170 with observation), PORT significantly improved DFS (42.8% vs 30.6%; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-1.00; P = .05) but not OS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.53-1.30; P = .41). The 3-year local recurrence only rates were 9.5% and 18.3% in the 2 arms, respectively (Fine-Gray HR, 0.55; Gray test P = .04). No radiotherapy-related grade 4 or 5 adverse event was observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this phase 3 randomized clinical trial of patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC after complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy, PORT did not improve DFS. Further studies exploring patients who might best benefit from PORT are needed.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00880971

No abstract

Studies have shown that miR-34c is associated with metastasis and the chemoresponse of several cancers, but its role in osteosarcoma (OS) is unclear. Here, we investigated the role and mechanism of miR-34c in OS metastasis and chemoresponse. In this study, we found that the expression of miR-34c was significantly decreased in specimens from OS patients with a poor chemoresponse or metastasis compared to those with a good chemoresponse and no metastasis. The inhibition of miR-34c significantly stimulated OS cell invasion and chemoresistance in vitro. In contrast, restoring miR-34c significantly inhibited OS cell invasion and chemoresistance. Furthermore, we identified Notch1 and lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) as target genes of miR-34c in OS cells and demonstrated that Notch1 and LEF1 have a major role in the effects of miR-34c on OS cell chemosensitivity and metastasis. Taken together, our data indicate that miR-34c suppresses OS metastasis and chemoresistance by targeting Notch1 and LEF1. Restoring miR-34c may have important implications for the development of strategies for inhibiting metastasis and overcoming OS cell resistance to chemotherapy.

Background: EPIC1 is an oncogenic long non-coding ribonucleic acid (RNA) that promotes cell growth and cell-cycle progression and inhibits apoptosis in several cancer cell lines. However, clinical studies on EPIC1 in breast cancer, specifically in the neoadjuvant setting, are relatively few. Methods: Patients treated with weekly paclitaxel–cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy after core-needle biopsy were included in the study. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays were performed to detect EPIC1 expression. Results: Among all patients included in this study ( n = 111), higher EPIC1 expression was associated with estrogen receptor negativity, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity, higher Ki67 index, and higher histologic grade. Multivariate analysis suggested that EPIC1 expression was an independent predictive factor for pathological complete response, with a significant interaction between EPIC1 expression and age. The Kaplan–Meier Plotter dataset suggested that the EPIC1 high-expression group showed a worse 10-year distant metastasis-free survival and post-progression survival when compared with the EPIC1 low-expression group. The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset suggested that the overall survival in the EPIC1 high-expression group was inferior to that in the EPIC1 low-expression group, specifically in hormone receptor (HorR)-positive patients and patients aged <50 years. Pathway analysis revealed the top pathways that indicated the potential mechanisms of EPIC1 in chemoresistance, including the daunorubicin and doxorubicin metabolic processes. Conclusions: Our study suggests that EPIC1 may be a promising biomarker for both neoadjuvant chemosensitivity and long-term clinical outcomes in breast cancer, specifically in the HorR-positive premenopausal subgroup. It may also help identify candidate responders and determine treatment strategies.