Porcine circoviruses (PCVs) are circular, non-enveloped, single-stranded DNA viruses. They belongs to the genus Circovirus in the family Circoviridae (Mankertz et al., 2004). Four species of PCVs have been characterized, including PCV1, PCV2, PCV3 and PCV4 (Phan et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2020). PCV1 is not pathogenic (Tischer et al., 1982). PCV2 is considered a causative agent of porcine circovirus-associated diseases (PCVAD) (Segales, 2012). PCV3 is associated with reproductive failure, porcine dermatitis and nephropathy syndrome (PDNS) and multi-systemic inflammation (Palinski et al., 2017;
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus 1 (PRRSV1) and 2 (PRRSV2) (including 3 major subtypes: classical (CA‐PRRSV2), highly pathogenic (HP‐PRRSV2) and NADC30‐like (NL‐PRRSV2)) are currently coexisting in Chinese swine herds but with distinct virulence. Reliable detection and differentiation assays are crucial to monitor the prevalence of PRRSV and to adopt effective control strategies. However, current diagnostic methods cannot simultaneously differentiate the four major groups of PRRSV in China. In this study, universal and quadruplex real‐time RT‐PCR assays using TaqMan‐MGB probes were developed for simultaneous detection and differentiation of Chinese PRRSV isolates. The newly developed real‐time RT‐PCR assays exhibited good specificity, sensitivity, repeatability and reproducibility. In addition, the newly developed real‐time RT‐PCR assays were further validated by comparing with a universal PRRSV conventional RT‐PCR assay on the detection of 664 clinical samples collected from 2016 to 2019 in China. Based on the clinical performance, the agreements between the universal and quadruplex real‐time RT‐PCR assays and the conventional RT‐PCR assay were 99.55% and 99.40%, respectively. Totally 90 samples were detected as PRRSV‐positive, including 2 samples that were determined to be co‐infected with NL‐PRRSV2 and HP‐PRRSV2 isolates by the quadruplex real‐time RT‐PCR assay. ORF5 sequencing confirmed the real‐time RT‐PCR results that 2, 6, 27 and 57 of the 92 sequences were PRRSV1, CA‐PRRSV2, NL‐PRRSV2 and HP‐PRRSV2, respectively. This study provides promising alternative tools for simultaneous detection and differentiation of PRRSV circulating in Chinese swine herds.
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) causes huge economic loss to the global swine industry. Even though several control strategies have been applied, PRRS is still not effectively controlled due to the continuous emergence of new variants and limited cross-protection by current vaccines. During the routine epidemiological investigation in 2017, two PRRSV variants were identified from a severe abortion farm and a clinically healthy farm, respectively. The viruses were isolated and denominated as XJ17-5 and JSTZ1712-12. Genomic sequencing indicated that their genomes are both 14,960 bp in length sharing 99.45% nucleotide identity. Sequence alignments identified a discontinuous 30-amino-acid deletion and a continuous 120-amino-acid deletion in nsp2 of both isolates. Genome-based phylogenetic analysis confirmed that XJ17-5 and JSTZ1712-12 belong to the HP-PRRSV subtype but form a new branch with other isolates containing the same 150-amino-acid deletion in nsp2. Pathogenic analysis showed that XJ17-5 is highly virulent causing 60% mortality, while JSTZ1712-12 is avirulent for piglets. Furthermore, fragment comparisons identified 34-amino-acid differences between XJ17-5 and JSTZ1712-12 that might be associated with the distinct virulence. The identification of highly homologous HP-PRRSV variants with new genetic feature and distinct virulence contributes to further analyze the pathogenesis and evolution of PRRSV in the field.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.