Background: Of the many scoring systems currently available, the modified Alvarado scoring system (MASS) is the most widely employed, because of its ability to reduce negative appendectomy rate (NAR). Unfortunately, this system is more accurate in western population. In spite of the advances in the diagnostic and imaging techniques NAR have not decreased much. This clearly indicates the need of development of new diagnostic scoring system so we have developed new diagnostic scoring system (Yash Score). The objective of this study was to develop and study diagnostic accuracy of new diagnostic scoring system (Yash scoring system) for acute appendicitis.Methods: A prospective comparison YSS and MASS was done on 418 patients. Depending on clinical judgement appendicectomy was done. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy for YSS and MASS were calculated using SPSS 17.0 statistical software for statistical analysis and compared using Chi-square test.Results: The sensitivity and specificity of YSS was found to be 99.48 per cent and 92.86 percent respectively. The sensitivity and specify of MASS was 52.05 per cent and 100 per cent respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of YSS was 99.48 per cent and 92.86 per cent respectively. Negative and positive predictive values of MASS were 13.02% and 100% respectively.Conclusions: Comparison in between YSS and MASS in the present study shows significant statistical difference.

The demand for improvement in healthcare delivery has been increasing. Thus, a standardized method allows quality assessment of data and its comparison between various institutions over time. Many attempts have been made to classify surgical complications before 1990; however, none of those attempts gained popularity and acceptance. Clavien and his colleagues started the wave by explaining negative outcomes on the basis of complications, failure to cure, and sequelae. Complications were primarily defined as “any deviation from the normal postoperative course”. Since then, many such classification systems and grading systems have been introduced and studied for analyzing the post-operative complications. The purpose of this study was to review the revolution in the classification systems for surgical complications, its validation, and to analyze the results of various qualitative indicators for post-operative complications obtained by using these classification systems. A global set of keywords were built such as “grading of surgical complications”, “abdominal surgery”, “classification of surgical complications”, and the “Clavien Dindo Classification”. A literature review was done using PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar. A list of reference articles concerning the literature on classification systems for surgical complications was manually analyzed from the year 1992 and the data was summarized.

Background: Incidence of perforation on posterior wall of stomach is rare throughout world; its occurrence has not been found till now in literature of central India. diffuse symptoms with delayed presentation to health center and poorly skilled faculty with facilities make a way to raise in total number of deaths associated with posterior gastric perforation. Objective: To report a rare case of posterior gastric perforation at a tertiary health care center in Central India, which would be first to be documented. Case Presentation: A 74-year-old male patient was referred to Department of General Surgery, AVBRH, with chief complaint of acute abdominal pain for two days. He had a history of alcohol consumtion which was stopped 2 years back A moderately distended, distinctly tender abdomen accompanied by guarding, rigidity and excluded bowel sounds was unveiled by abdominal examination. Patient has been resuscitated with intravenous fluids, antibiotics and analgesics. Consequently, an emergency exploratory laparotomy revealed a significant collection of purulent peritoneal fluid, 1x1 cm sized perforation on posterior wall of stomach. Perforation was repaired and thus patient recovered in a satisfactory way. Conclusion: And since posterior gastric perforation is extremely uncommon and expected to worsen, associated with increased morbidity and mortality leading to missed presence, this case report indicates that evaluation of patients with gastric perforation, identify risk factors and ability to repair perforations right away along with resuscitation will greatly enhance clinical outcome.

No abstract

No abstract