Hate speech is a special term for criminal offenses such as hate expression, incitement, libel and defamation on behalf of race, ethnicity, religion, class or gender. That action is flare in public communication, especially in the Internet media. Although there have been various regulations governing, countermeasures against hate speech is not maximized. It could not be separated from the difficulty of determining the boundaries of hate speech with freedom of expression. This study aims to answer these problems in the perspective of Islamic law. The theory used is takzir and Maqasidu al-Syari’ah. The results of this study illustrate that the hate speech is a criminal offense punishable takzir and require a social approach in overcoming it. In the formulation of Islamic law, definition of hate speech is taken from the Korans argument that protect human rights in order to be limiting freedom of expression. Keywords: Speech, Hate, Law, Islam

The villages as a local government directly serve the public should always provide good public services. On this basis, this article analyzes how the implementation of e-Government by village governments can contribute positively to village`s governance and public service seen from a public values perspective. The research method used in this research is the descriptive research method with a qualitative approach. Sources of data come from secondary sources from books, journal articles and other relevant documents. The results of the analysis revealed that there are at least 3 (three) public values from the adoption of e-Government at the village level, namely: First, the commitment of the village government to provide technology-based public services would create good public services. Second, the implementation of e-Government ensures the public's right to participate in government administration in which the adoption of technology and information provides rights for open and collaborative governance. Third, the implementation of e-Government encourages the acceleration of a digital society which would contribute positively to village development and create public welfare.

The position of the victim in the criminal justice system is not considered as a subject or object. These problems are inseparable from the understanding that criminal law only regulates the relationship between the state and individuals. Positive laws governing the position of victims are contained in the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code as well as regulations outside the criminal justice system. The regulation is very limited to the victim as a legal object, not a determinant. In the perspective of Islamic law, the position of the victim is regulated in the crime of qisas and takzir. Victims get the right to determine punishment for criminals by implementing qisas, forgiveness or diyat. In the takzir crime, the ruler or judge can determine to compensate the victim as a forgiving or reducing crime. This research is a normative juridical research with a comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that there are similarities and differences in the regulation regarding the position of victims in positive law and Islamic law. Equality lies in the types of rights received by victims in the form of material compensation, compensation, restitution and rehabilitation except in takzir in the form of a decision to marry a rape victim. The difference lies in the position of the victim in positive law which does not include the victim as part of the criminal justice system, while in Islamic law as in qisas, the victim is an inseparable part of the criminal justice system.Kedudukan korban dalam sistem peradilan pidana tidak dianggap sebagai subjek ataupun objek. Permasalahan tersebut tidak terlepas dari pemahaman bahwa hukum pidana hanya mengatur hubungan antara negara dan individu. Hukum positif yang mengatur tentang kedudukan korban terdapat dalam KUHP dan KUHAP serta regulasi di luar sistem peradilan pidana. Pengaturannya sangat terbatas kepada korban sebagai objek hukum bukan penentu. Dalam perspektif hukum Islam kedudukan korban diatur dalam tindak pidana qisas dan takzir. Korban mendapatkan hak sebagai penentu hukuman bagi pelaku tindak pidana dengan pelaksanaan qisas, pemaafan atau diyat. Pada tindak pidana takzir penguasa atau hakim dapat menentukan mengganti kerugian korban sebagai pemaaf atau pengurang tindak pidana. Penelitian merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat persamaan dan perbedaan pengaturan tentang kedudukan korban dalam hukum positif maupun hukum Islam. Persamaan terletak pada jenis hak yang diterima korban berupa pengganti kerugian materi, konpensasi, restitusi dan rehabilitasi kecuali dalam takzir berupa putusan untuk menikahi seorang korban perkosaan. Perbedaan terletak pada kedudukan korban dalam hukum positif yang tidak memasukan korban bagian dalam sistem peradilan pidana, sedangkan dalam hukum Islam sebagaimana qisas, korban merupakan bagian yang tidak terpisahkan dari sistem peradilan pidana

This paper aims to describe the process of overcoming hate speech crimes during the caliphate of 'Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib in the perspective of the history of Islamic law. The important question to be answered in this paper is how did the caliph 'Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib contribute to handling the problem of hate speech? This paper finds three essential things. First, the death of Caliph 'Uthmān became the cause of the emergence of various slander. The main perpetrators were the Sabā’iyyah, Khawarij, and Shia groups. The form of slander is in the form of hate speech, such as insulting, defaming, inciting, spreading hoaxes which are violations of human rights and have discriminated against certain entities and individuals. Second, the policy of overcoming hate speech is pursued by a criminal and social law approach. Third, the relevance between ‘Alī ibn Abī Ṭālib's policy and existing regulations in Indonesia lies in the form of actions, punishments, and protection of human rights from discrimination.

The protection of the rights to freedom of religion and belief in the constitution aims to create a community life based on morals based on divinity. As a country with a high level of plurality from the aspects of religion and belief, protection of religious harmony and belief is necessary to achieve this goal. Based on the above points of thought, several problems can be formulated, namely how is the current criminal policy in overcoming offenses against religious and belief harmony. And what will the future criminal policy be in overcoming offenses against religious harmony and belief. The method used in this research is a normative juridical approach, where the data used are secondary sources in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials.This research is a descriptive analytical study, namely research to describe the problem, analyze the problem and classify the problem for research purposes which are presented descriptively. The results of this study indicate that the criminal acts formulated in the Criminal Code are very limited, including not protecting beliefs protected by the constitution and there is still a divergence by including religious offenses in the Chapter on Public Order. In the non-penal policy, the regulations governing religious harmony are still ineffective and the current government is not serious about creating harmony between religious and believers. Future penal efforts can be made by updating the Criminal Code. As an effort to improve, the concept of the Criminal Code can formulate the provisions of offenses by looking at the provisions of offenses contained in the Draft Law on Religious Harmony. In non-penal efforts, the approach is through the formulation and implementation of government programs. Among them are approaches to understanding theology, education, dialogue and conflict resolution.Perlindungan atas hak kebebasan beragama dan berkepercayaan dalam konstitusi bertujuan supaya tercipta kehidupan masyarakat yang berlandaskan moral atas dasar ketuhanan. Sebagai negara dengan tingkat pluralitas yang tinggi dari aspek agama dan kepercayaan, maka perlindungan terhadap kerukunan umat beragama dan berkepercayaan mutlak dibutuhkan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut. Berdasarkan pokok pemikiran di atas, maka dapat dirumuskan beberapa permasalahan, yaitu bagaimanakah kebijakan kriminal saat ini dalam menanggulangi delik-delik terhadap kerukunan umat beragama dan berkepercayaan. Dan bagaimanakah kebijakan kriminal yang akan datang dalam menanggulangi delik-delik terhadap kerukunan umat beragama dan berkepercayaan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif, dimana data yang digunakan adalah sumber sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder maupun bahan hukum tersier. Adapun penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif analitis, yaitu penelitian untuk mendeskripsikan masalah, menganalisis masalah dan mengklasifikasi masalah untuk kepentingan penelitian yang disajikan secara deskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa tindak pidana yang dirumuskan dalam KUHP sangatlah terbatas, diantaranya belum melindungi kepercayaan yang dilindungi konstitusi serta masih terdapat divergensi dengan memasukan delik agama dalam Bab Ketertiban Umum. Dalam kebijakan non penal, regulasi yang mengatur tentang kerukunan umat beragama masih kurang efektif serta pemerintah saat ini tidak serius menciptakan harmonisasi antar umat beragama dan berkepercayaan. Upaya penal yang akan datang dapat dilakukan dengan pembaharuan KUHP. Sebagai upaya penyempurnaan, Konsep KUHP dapat memformulasikan ketentuan delik dengan melihat ketentuan delik yang terdapat dalam RUU Kerukunan Umat Beragama. Dalam upaya non penal, pendekatan melalui penyusunan dan pelaksanaan program pemerintah. Diantaranya dengan pendekatan pemahaman teologi, pendidikan, dialog dan resolusi konflik.