The precise and conceptual insight of circulating endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) kinetics is hampered by the absence of an assay system capable of evaluating the EPC differentiation cascade. An assay system for EPC colony formation was developed to delineate circulating EPC differentiation. EPC colony-forming assay using semisolid medium and single or bulk CD133؉ cells from umbilical cord blood exhibited the formation of two types of attaching cell colonies made of small or large cells featuring endothelial lineage potential and properties, termed small EPC colony-forming units and large EPC colony-forming units, respectively. In vitro and in vivo assays of each EPC colony-forming unit cell revealed a differentiation hierarchy from small EPC to large EPC colonies, indicating a primitive EPC stage with highly proliferative activity and a definitive EPC stage with vasculogenic properties, respectively. Experimental comparison with a conventional EPC culture assay system disclosed EPC colony-forming unit cells differentiate into noncolony-forming early EPC. The fate analysis of single CD133؉ cells into the endothelial and hematopoietic lineage was achieved by combining this assay system with a hematopoietic progenitor assay and demonstrated the development of colony-forming EPC and hematopoietic progenitor cells from a single hematopoietic stem cell. EPC colony-forming assay permits the determination of circulating EPC kinetics from single or bulk cells, based on the evaluation of hierarchical EPC colony formation. This assay further enables a proper exploration of possible links between the origin of EPC and hematopoietic stem cells, representing a novel and powerful tool to investigate the molecular signaling pathways involved in EPC biology. (Circ Res. 2011;109:20-37.) Key Words: clonogenic assay Ⅲ differentiation Ⅲ endothelial progenitor cell Ⅲ vasculogenesis D espite significant efforts in research and development with respect to endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) biology during the past 10 years after their initial isolation, 1 EPC remain a controversial topic among researchers because there is no definitive delineation of EPC, no clear differentiation hierarchy, or any unambiguously defined isolation protocol.EPC have been quantified and qualified either as cell populations identified by cell surface markers such as CD34, CD133, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] or as adhesive cells 6,9,10 and colonies 11 using conventional EPC culture methods to produce spindle-shape adherent cells from peripheral blood (PB), bone marrow (BM), or umbilical cord blood (UCB) mononuclear cells (MNC) with endothelial growth factors and cytokines. These assays using conventional EPC culture protocols were simple and satisfactory to speculate on the vasculogenic properties of EPC-enriched fractions but have recently been criticized. These assays further group heterogeneous EPC into one qualitative category: "adhesive cultured EPC" without any hierarchical discrimination ...
BackgroundCell‐based therapies involving mononuclear cells (MNCs) have been developed for vascular regeneration to treat ischemic diseases; however, quality control of therapeutic MNCs has not been evaluated. We investigated the therapeutic potential of peripheral blood (PB) MNCs, operated by recently developed quality and quantity (QQ) culture of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs).Methods and ResultsPBs were collected from healthy volunteers; peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) isolated from these PBs were subjected to QQ culture for 7 days with medium containing stem cell factor, thrombopoietin, Flt‐3 ligand, vascular endothelial growth factor, and interleukin‐6. The resulting cells (QQMNCs) in EPC colony‐forming assay generated significantly more definitive EPC colonies than PBMNCs. In flow cytometry, macrophages and helper T lymphocytes of QQMNCs became phenotypically polarized into angiogenic, anti‐inflammatory, and regenerative subsets: classical M1 to alternative M2; T helper (Th)1 to Th2; angiogenic or regulatory T‐cell expansion. Quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR) assay revealed the predominant proangiogenic gene expressions in QQMNCs versus PBMNCs. Using murine ischemic hindlimb models, the efficacy of QQMNC intramuscular transplantation (Tx) was compared to that of PBMNCTx, cultured “early EPC” Tx (eEPCTx), and granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor mobilized CD34+ cell Tx (GmCD34Tx). Laser Doppler imaging revealed the blood perfusion recovery in ischemic hindlimbs after QQMNCTx superior to after PBMNCTx and eEPCTx, but also earlier than after GmCD34Tx. Histological evaluations and qRT‐PCR assays in ischemic hindlimbs demonstrated that QQMNCTx, similarly to GmCD34Tx, enhanced angiovasculogenesis and myogenesis, whereas it preponderantly inhibited inflammation and fibrosis versus PBMNCTx and eEPCTx.ConclusionsQQ culture potentiates the ability of PBMNCs to promote regeneration of injured tissue; considering the feasible cell preparation, QQ culture‐treated PBMNCs may provide a promising therapeutic option for ischemic diseases.Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: irb.med.u-tokai.ac.jp/d/2/monthly/2010.html; IRB No.: 10R‐020.URL: irb.med.u-tokai.ac.jp/d/2/monthly/201312.html; IRB No.: 13R228.
This paper treats the stability of two superposed gravitating streams rotating about the axis transverse to the horizontal magnetic field. The critical wave number for instability is found to be affected by rotation for propagation perpendicular to the axis about which the system rotates. The critical wave number for instability is not affected by rotation when waves propagate along the axis of rotation. The critical wave number is affected by both the magnetic field and the streaming velocity in both cases. Both the magnetic field and the rotation are stabilizing, while the streaming velocity is destabilizing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.