To characterize various animal models of neuropathic pain, we compared three previously developed rat models using the same behavioral testing methods. These models involve: (1) chronic constriction injury by loose ligation of the sciatic nerve (CCI); (2) tight ligation of the partial sciatic nerve (PSL); and (3) tight ligation of spinal nerves (SNL). Comparisons were made for the time course of behavioral signs representing various components of neuropathic pain as well as for the effects of surgical sympathectomy. In general, all three methods of peripheral nerve injury produced behavioral signs of both ongoing and evoked pain with similar time courses. However, there was a considerable difference in the magnitude of each pain component between models. Signs of mechanical allodynia were largest in the SNL injury and smallest in the CCI model. On the other hand, behavioral signs representing ongoing pain were much more prominent in the CCI model than in the other two. Although the behavioral signs of neuropathic pain tended to decrease after sympathectomy in all three models, the change was most evident in the SNL model. The results of the present study suggest that the three rat models tested have contrasting features, yet all are useful neuropathic pain models, possibly representing different populations of human neuropathic pain patients.
These results demonstrated that KT application with proper tension to the quadriceps effectively attenuates various types of pain and improves AROM and proprioception in osteoarthritis patients. Thus, KT may be a suitable intervention to improve pain, AROM, and proprioception in patients with osteoarthritis in clinics.
This study was conducted to determine the contribution of peripheral inputs from injured and intact afferent fibers to behavioral signs of neuropathic pain, using a previously developed neuropathic rat model. Neuropathic injury was produced by tightly ligating the left L5 and L6 spinal nerves; this procedure induced rats to display neuropathic pain behaviors in the ipsilateral hindlimb. The behaviors included signs of mechanical and cold allodynia, as well as ongoing pain. Five days after neuropathic injury, peripheral inputs from injured segments (L5 and L6) or intact segments (L3 and L4) were blocked by either transection of the dorsal roots or application of a local anesthetic (bupivacaine) to the roots. Dorsal rhizotomy of the injured segments reduced all components of neuropathic pain behaviors. In contrast, dorsal rhizotomy of the uninjured segments abolished behavioral signs of mechanical and cold allodynia, but signs of ongoing pain were preserved. Blocking afferent inputs by application of bupivacaine mimicked the results of dorsal rhizotomy, in a reversible manner. These results suggest that afferent signals from injured and intact fibers play distinctively different roles in neuropathic pain: inputs from injured afferents maintain all components of neuropathic pain, while those from intact afferents mediate evoked pain such as mechanical and cold allodynia. An hypothesis is proposed to explain the results of the present as well as other published studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.